Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Darlington nurses win their employment tribunal

473 replies

Lovelyview · 16/01/2026 11:43

https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/victory-for-darlington-nurses-as-judge-rules-policy-that-allows-men-into-womens-changing-rooms-is-unlawful-harassment-and-discrimination/

Brilliant news!

Victory for Darlington nurses as Judge rules policy that allows men into women’s changing rooms is unlawful harassment and discrimination - Christian Concern

In a landmark judgment, an Employment Tribunal has ruled that County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust unlawfully discriminated against and harassed the female nurses by requiring them to share female-only changing rooms with a biological male...

https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/victory-for-darlington-nurses-as-judge-rules-policy-that-allows-men-into-womens-changing-rooms-is-unlawful-harassment-and-discrimination/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Flangle · 16/01/2026 13:23

Brilliant! Get in there!

up yours NHS, Scottish government, labour fuckwits, GLP, stonewall, sandy kemp, bloody BBC

ThatCyanCat · 16/01/2026 13:24

WarriorN · 16/01/2026 13:16

It’s suddenly occurred to me that they could have been waiting for this judgement??

To think, I could have lived in a time where I saw the Beatles perform live, or thr first performance of the Rite of Spring, or the sealing of the Magna Carta...

And I instead live in a time when hospitals need Supreme Courts and tribunals to tell them men aren't women.

I could weep.

SirEctor · 16/01/2026 13:24

Excellent news. Now to get the Sandie Peggie ruling overturned on appeal and make this eminently sensible position binding.

bigyellowtractorface · 16/01/2026 13:26

Which bit of the peggie tribunal needs over ruling? I thought she won her case?

ElevensesKing · 16/01/2026 13:27

Fantastic news and makes me so hopeful that the tide is turning, slowly but surely. Well done to all those involved. I was amazed that the BBC referred to the Dr in question as a biological male identifying as a female.

MissHelenSweetstory · 16/01/2026 13:28

Sad times 😉

Lalgarh · 16/01/2026 13:29

Purely by coincidence tuned into r4news.

Female reporter explaining that BC the tribunal was using "they" and "rose" so as not to pre. Judge the case, so are they. I wish they would be this transparent in general

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 16/01/2026 13:30

bigyellowtractorface · 16/01/2026 13:26

Which bit of the peggie tribunal needs over ruling? I thought she won her case?

Discussion here:

www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5472628-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-following-employment-tribunal-judgment-thread-61

SirEctor · 16/01/2026 13:33

bigyellowtractorface · 16/01/2026 13:26

Which bit of the peggie tribunal needs over ruling? I thought she won her case?

The tribunal found that NHS Fife had cocked up the investigation into the incident and had treated SP unfairly in this aspect, but not that it was inherently unfair to allow men to use the women's changing rooms. It was a partial win but it is being appealed. See the SP threads if you want (lots and lots) more detail and analysis 😄

Fuggleup · 16/01/2026 13:36

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Iamnotalemming · 16/01/2026 13:36

Oh I am a bit bloody weepy, that's brilliant news. Brave brave women. Shame on those NHS managers who caused this and the HR bod who sent the women off to do 'be kind’ training.

Come on, Wes and Brigitte, it’s your turn now...

Judge Kemp: here's some CPD reading for you. Perhaps you'd like a refresher session in accurate legal research as well?

NebulousSadTimes · 16/01/2026 13:38

Did I hear the correspondent on World at One saying "biological trans woman"?

allthingsinmoderation · 16/01/2026 13:38

Thank goodness.

PosyFossilsShoes · 16/01/2026 13:39

In the great scheme of things I think it could actually be beneficial that Rose wasn't found to have harassed the nurses himself. It takes away any shred of doubt that it's the whole policy which is discriminatory against women and creates a hostile environment, not the bad behaviour of individuals who benefit from the policy.

frazzled1 · 16/01/2026 13:39

Brilliant brave women 💪

Stopbringingmicehome · 16/01/2026 13:40

I don't think the nurses took Rose to court as it wasn't aimed at him

MadinMarch · 16/01/2026 13:40

Wonderful news! Thank you Darlington Nurses for taking this on so bravely.

spannasaurus · 16/01/2026 13:41

Stopbringingmicehome · 16/01/2026 13:40

I don't think the nurses took Rose to court as it wasn't aimed at him

He was a named respondent in the case

Another2Cats · 16/01/2026 13:42

theilltemperedamateur · 16/01/2026 12:35

The respondent's liability might be mitigated by the fact that they were following EHRC's 2011 guidance (now known to be wrong). I don't know what that means in practice, as we don't have punitive damages in England. Does anyone know?

I don't know but I don't think so. It is the Supreme Court (not the EHRC) that authoritatively determines the law.

So, once the Supreme Court rules on something then that is the law.

The EHRC’s role is to provide guidance to assist people to understand and comply with their rights and obligations under the Equality Act 2010; its role is not to determine the law or to interpret the Equality Act.

This is laid out in the Equality Act 2006.

It was also referenced in a 2018 case, City of York Council v Grosset [2018] EWCA Civ 1105 at [42] and [68], .

Iamnotalemming · 16/01/2026 13:44

NebulousSadTimes · 16/01/2026 13:38

Did I hear the correspondent on World at One saying "biological trans woman"?

Yes I heard that. She sounded a bit nervous and fluffed it up I suspect.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 16/01/2026 13:44

spannasaurus · 16/01/2026 13:41

He was a named respondent in the case

He also applied for anonymity which was refused.

JustHereWithMyPopcorn · 16/01/2026 13:45

Fantastic news!

CarobBean72 · 16/01/2026 13:49

Greyskybluesky · 16/01/2026 12:35

How is anyone to know you're playing devil's advocate? Your post looked exactly like the typical TRA stirring we get on here. Make it clear if you're not. And maybe start a new thread to ask your question instead of derailing this one?

Or better yet, Kermit could READ THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT which deals with this very question clearly & definitively.

But for some reason, actually knowing the answer would spoil Kermit’s game.

Nec Licit Alimentare Trollibus

INeedAPensieve · 16/01/2026 13:49

Wonderful news! Well done to all those brave nurses. Makes me angry all over again for Sandie Peggie though, I hope she takes heart from this judgement and it will hopefully help her with her appeal x

ParmaVioletTea · 16/01/2026 13:57

Fantastic news!