Glinner Bullseye comment on X

[Thatcatsaflippingnightmare]

Always trying to explain Glinner to DH, today he showed me on X JD Vance defending murder of the woman by ICE. Glinner had replied something like 'bullseye', as in agreement. I tried to comprehend with "satire?" but he said no he's on Liz truss show these days. I said well he's always been about protecting women and children, he's not suddenly supporting femicide, but the post convinced DH otherwise. Any insights? I'm not on social media

Agreed. The right wing is so transparent. They couldn’t give a shit about women. There’s zero way they care about our single sex spaces while simultaneously taking away reproductive rights. I’m mean, give me a break. That’s before we get onto shooting women in the face…

This was one of the ones I saw, I mean, what the fuck is he thinking. He is coming across as hating women, honestly, I was actually shocked. I haven’t always liked some of the things he’s said, but not to this extent, just being a little bit rabid with his responses to TRA’s, which is sometimes understandable! This is something else though, I wonder if he’s actually well.

I have not said that. I have explicitly said that we cannot know exactly what happened and that it would be prudent to await the outcome of the inquest, or whatever type of investigation the US have in these cases.

What I have said is that annoying men with guns is a lot more likely to result in them shooting you than not annoying them is, especially when the State has armed those men. I have said that compliance with such men maximises your chance of walking away from the encounter. I have not endorsed this reality, but merely described.

Read what I actually write. Don't add extra words or meanings that aren't actually there. Don't fabricate opinions and ascribe them to me.

This week has been an eye opener, between the shooting of RNG and Grok. You are not alone in your dismayal at some of the things being said by voices you trust and respect.

There’s an illuminating reply from Glinner on his feed that might give some insight into his mindset about this:

“Is it now a feminist action to try and run over police officers with a car? If so, I'm out.”

Of course, this assumes that Renee Good was trying to run over the officer, and all the video I’ve seen so far doesn’t support that (plus she’d been shot in the head 3 times, rendering her incapable of controlling the car). He mentions feminists as he’s replying to a comment about feminists who have supported him being concerned about his current trajectory.

I’d suggest to him it’s human to feel the need to remove yourself from a concerning situation - fight or flight.
https://x.com/glinner/status/2010478977014755835?s=61&t=3wYru9P_J0h74BXKFXAfmw

Don’t annoy those men who are busy setting up a dictatorship! Be nice and polite, women!

I’ve just noticed Barack Obama is following him on X, that was unexpected.

Links please. I ask because I cannot see these retweets on Nitter and anyone can create a TwiX account and give someone else's long name. Those images show his long name, not his unique username, and I'd like to verify that they are genuinely him.

First Rule of Misogyny: "Women are responsible for what men do".

Well they are there. I also found it via Nitter. I'm not sure why it's so hard to believe he would retweet something like this. He is prolific and careless.

https://nitter.net/Glinner/with_replies?cursor=DAAHCgABG-bERU___xkLAAIAAAATMjAwOTgwMjQyMTAwNzIwMDY1MAgAAwAAAAIAAA (scroll down)

That poster said that GC feminists are usually left-wing. GC feminists are women who defend women's rights, with particular focus on safeguarding and single-sex services. Newspapers are not women, they are not even people, so they cannot be feminists. That poster was talking about what individual people think, not what a newspaper's editorial stance might be.

Thanks. I was checking for false flag actions. Damn him for what he's done, not what he hasn't done.

His tweeting has tended towards the obnoxious and bitter style (when he's angry or resentful) in recent times but, given that I've seen him support women fighting for their rights in various countries around the world, and in the last few weeks specifically in Iran, I was confused by a retweet of a man who wanted to remove women's right to participate in democracy.

Your explanation makes more sense to me than that he's changed so much as to want to prevent women from voting.

Maybe we need to reclaim "terf".

I didn't say women are responsible for glinners behaviour. Nice strawman.

However i stand by what i said, GC views are right wing. They're grossly oversaurated by right wing figures, parties and media. Trans people are the political football gay people were in the 80s. First they came for the trans people..........

glinner going more right wing because he wants to tap into the MAGA grift well isn't the fault of women. But it's also not unrelated. Do you think if the it crowd episode debacle didnt get him into the GC rabbit hole he'd have ended up liking the tories or trump? Not a chance.

Earlier today, I tried scrolling back for a month on his TwiX feed and couldn't find the exact tweet. Are you able to give me an exact link to the tweet? Ta in advance.

The tweet is still there as is glinners retweet. It's the 14th one down in the link you've quoted.

Also he's retweeted someone whining about race traitors lol.

Smart people choose carefully when and how to be defiant. You can die fruitlessly, or you can live to fight more effectively. It's easy to talk a big fight like you are from behind a keyboard, much harder to live it in reality.

Darnella Frazier spoke of feeling guilty about not intervening to save George Floyd. She's the teen girl who videoed his murder. She had a choice: try to physically intervene; leave the scene; or quietly and discreetly video the incident from a distance and hope the police didn't notice her. The first option would have got her arrested or shot and George Floyd would still be dead. The second would have been the safest for her. The third option, the one she took, put her at less risk than the first and also put Derek Chauvin in prison. Darnella Frazier was smart.

It is beyond irresponsible to suggest that women don't comply with State-armed men and to claim that those who disagree with you are "bootlickers".

It's about being vigilant to bad actors spreading misinformation. Damn him for what he does, not what others do.

Thanks for the exact location.

I confess that I'm puzzled that Glinner never learns to curb his impulsiveness on social media.

Believing that sex is binary and immutable is no more right-wing than believing that the earth orbits the sun. Believing that sex needs to be recognised in law and policy has been uncontroversial since no later than the Gaols Act 1823, so over 200 years.

Glinner was GC long before Channel Four pulled that episode from their streaming service.

He's a scumbag and he always has been. Became utterly obsessed with something and chose to let it destroy his life and career rather than letting it go because he couldn't handle 'losing'.

Then because that something was the trans debate, he found a new section of support and thought he could parlay it into getting his career back on track. Unfortunately they were only interested in his mouth and not his comedy, and he went fully off the deep end, pushing it to see what he could get away with until there was no coming back.

Now he's trying to do the 'Move to the US and grift the right' thing, only unlike Brand, he's got no connections and nobody knows who he is.

Now the mask is slipping, and the women who back him for his willingness to shout about trans issues are learning that he has no respect for women after all.

Pathetic.

He is pathetic and I hope he tries to show his face here again after showing what he's really like . don't think he can expect much sympathy here anymore lol.

https://nitter.net/Glinner/status/2010507779195523196#m

just stay out of womens spaces mate

someone remind glinner of his words there next time he comes asking for support lol

In all honesty, to me, the way you've written this post comes across just as obsessive, cynical and bitter as the Glinner tweets you've complained about.

So the perspective you've given me of both you and him, from how you write online here, is that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

I disagree that he's got no respect for women at all; I find him a confusing person in that he has good impulses that I admire and negative impulses that I deplore.