I think as with guns, its isn't that guns are autonomously dangerous, it is the dangerous (usually men) who decide what the gun should be used for.
AI as a tool could be useful, but if its morals, and aspirations, are based on the male view of the world, then it is of course dangerous to women.
So yet again, something that could be put to beneficial ends, is ending up as another form a male domination of women.
AI didn't think on its own, let's digitly strip a woman, the perverted sick mind of a male person inspired it to think this was of value.
That is the problem with tech generally. The majority of those who create it are male, and they imbue their male values into the systems they create.
There should be 2 tiers in tech. People who are clever at coding, but probably have values none of us would like (ie Musk) who should be treated as drones. Then an upper level, predominantly women, who think of and design a system that would be of use to the world, and not endanger women. They then issue instructions to the code level techs and say get on and do the work to make this happen. And dont try and sneak in any clever deviations from the design output outlined.
It is male dominated AI that is the problem.
(And this isn't reallly a new problem for years now in the internet women in the public eye have had there face imposed onto a naked female body and shared to humiliate and embarrass them.)