Sorry don't recall details, but there was a case where women temporarily weaked enough to be unable to defend themselves, (i.i.r.c. after strokes?) but not terminally ill, were being smothered to death overnight, to enable/enhance their violent rape. This was almost 'routine'. Finally, a female employee in the mortuary "got tired" of seeing so many women, usually middle aged or older, arriving dead purportedly from stroke or heart attack, yet with extreme blood loss and serious injury between their legs. Then, now and presumably always, the whistle-blower has an entire career to lose, as ranks close and as nobody ever did care what happens to vulnerable people, especially if it happens to females. Anywhere there are prey, there will be predators.
On a related matter, it seems clear cctv must be mandatory in all settings where such abuse is possible. With new technology, the film can be 'watched' by machines, which could alert human watchers to clips where an interaction seemed to deserve a closer look. Those watchers could be a mix of retired and part time and unemployed or carer volunteers and paid workers, just watching a few clips now and then at random, when they felt strong enough, and had time, all streamed to them in their own homes. There need be no geographical link, and the clips could be sent by numbers and codes, so there could be no collusion and no unhealthy unseemly interest, (and no way to screen-shot?)
People misguidedly object to cctv in care homes, or else say it should not be in bedrooms or bathrooms: This is for protection all night long in the care home or hospital. It is not going to be broadcast on national t.v.(!)
Sadly, England, the nation of animal- lovers has had to make a law that every area of a slaughter house must be filmed, in an effort to prevent cruelty to animals.
England has no such law to protect humans, especially women and children, because.......?