Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

JKR Didn’t Have an Opinion. She Poisoned the Well

1000 replies

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:32

This post will likely be a little too long for most, but if you can spare the time and have a cuppa handy let's sit down and have a chat, shall we?

Firstly, let’s stop calling this a debate. It’s not. This isn’t two sets of ideas clashing. This is one woman’s fear and confusion being weaponized against an entire community.

What J.K. Rowling has done is not just share an opinion. She’s poisoned the well. And that poison is spreading through politics, education, the media, and even the courts.

At the beginning, it might have looked like a tweet. Then a blog. But what she wrote in that essay was revealing: “If I’d been born thirty years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge.”
That’s not neutral. That’s projection. It was a confession, repackaged as concern. She projected her own dysphoria and personal battles onto the entire trans community and used it as the foundation for a movement built on suspicion and fear.

She said she cared about women’s rights. Then aligned herself with those who believe all trans women are predators.
She liked racist and Islamophobic tweets. She repeated antisemitic tropes. She cast activists as violent men in dresses. She accused anyone who challenged her of misogyny while branding herself the face of feminism.
All the while she built up a devoted audience that now includes some of the most extreme anti-trans voices in Britain and beyond.

This “gender critical” movement is not about safety, and it’s certainly not about truth. It’s about control.
Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (Posie Parker), one of Rowling’s ideological allies, has welcomed neo-Nazis to her rallies. Actual Nazis. The kind of people Rowling once wrote villains about.
In one case, people connected to this movement were linked to the satanic terror group 764 — a group that has influenced teen suicides and violent attacks in UK schools. Let that sink in. This is who she’s empowering.

She didn’t just turn away when that started. She doubled down. She gave this movement a gloss of legitimacy. She used her fame to funnel people toward disinformation, fear, and cruelty—and dressed it all up as feminism. But it isn’t feminism when it excludes, vilifies, and harms other women. Especially trans women. Especially intersex people. Especially anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow fantasy of who is acceptable.

Rowling’s language now echoes in government documents. Her phrases like “gender ideology” have been lifted from far right sources, including the Vatican and authoritarian regimes, and mainstreamed into British law. Her influence helped set the stage for the UK Supreme Court to redefine the word “woman” based on sex assigned at birth, stripping rights from trans and intersex people under the Equality Act. That’s what happens when the well is poisoned. People stop thinking. They start reacting.

Meanwhile, her cult chant her slogans as though they are scientific fact. But science says otherwise. Peer-reviewed studies show that trans people’s brain structures do not align with their sex assigned at birth. They show that gender identity forms in the womb, shaped by hormones and biology not ideology. Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence. And intersex people exist. That is biological fact. Not one of these truths can be erased by Rowling’s fiction.

What makes this so dangerous is how calm it all sounds. Rowling doesn’t scream. She whispers. She calls it “concern.” She says she’s “just asking questions.”
But it’s never neutral to question someone’s right to exist. It’s not a debate when one side is simply trying to live and the other is trying to strip away their legal recognition and healthcare.

This isn’t just a disagreement. This is a slow campaign of erasure, led by someone with a global platform and millions in the bank.

She’s not some deluded soul from MN; she’s a multi-millionaire author whose words shape global policy. She’s not being silenced. She’s being echoed by judges, by pundits, by politicians trying to climb the ladder by stepping on the backs of trans, non-binary, and intersex people.

And let’s not pretend it stops there. Her influence has allowed people to feel safe expressing open homophobia, biphobia, and hatred toward anyone who challenges gender norms. Some of the same people aligned with her have mocked survivors, denied racism, and claimed slavery was “fine” if it was “kind.”
This is not a group grounded in empathy. It’s a movement that thrives on exclusion and resentment. Some of them now openly identify as neo Nazis. That’s where we are.

So next time someone says “she’s just worried” or “she’s not anti-trans” or “can’t we just disagree,” consider these words. Show them what poison looks like. Not just hateful speech but the deliberate seeding of doubt, division, and cruelty, all wrapped in a soft voice and a smug smile. J.K. Rowling didn’t protect anyone. She infected people. And when she’s gone, her legacy won’t be literature it will be the damage she left behind.

You don’t need to cancel her. You just need to see her clearly.
And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Because ignorance is not an excuse. Not anymore.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 16:46

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:45

That is an archaic view of looking at it. In Norway leave is granted equally for men and women. That includes transwomen and transmen

Transwomen can't be pregnant. Or give birth. That may be archaic, but it's also true.

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:46

I’m afraid that is your definition gushing sex / not the Bilolgical one

SionnachRuadh · 28/08/2025 16:46

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:44

Hormones.

if you are a biologist you will realise that a number of animals can change sex. The biggest driver of this is hormones.

Mammals don't change sex. If I castrate a male goat, that doesn't turn him into a female goat. Not even if he was a camp and swishy goat to begin with.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 16:46

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:41

Right wing? It’s the Gender cult that are right wing - aligning themselves to the opinions of musk and Trump.

I believe strongly in women’s rights ad I am a feminist. Norway has the best women’s rights in the riots according to the UN,

The GC cult has known ties to the right wing.

I think you are deluding yourself.

BTW there is no such poll that exists. We can google, you know. Why do you make things up?

murasaki · 28/08/2025 16:46

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:45

That is an archaic view of looking at it. In Norway leave is granted equally for men and women. That includes transwomen and transmen

That's shared parental leave and we have it here too..

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 16:47

CassOle · 28/08/2025 16:41

Please list the animals that can change sex that are specifically mammals.
Please state how we know that they have changed sex.

PS. I don't think that Biology is your strong point.

I don’t think mental wellness is his strong point.

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:47

That is correct and unfortunately not all women born keen can either.

In Norway like most Scandinavian countries we believe strongly in equal rights for all groups.

They is why maternity/paternity leave has equal weighting

Namelessnelly · 28/08/2025 16:47

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:41

Right wing? It’s the Gender cult that are right wing - aligning themselves to the opinions of musk and Trump.

I believe strongly in women’s rights ad I am a feminist. Norway has the best women’s rights in the riots according to the UN,

The GC cult has known ties to the right wing.

I think you are deluding yourself.

Ummm… hadn’t an actual nazi just declared he’s trans? In Germany. so I can think you’ll find you’re aligned with the far right. Not us.

murasaki · 28/08/2025 16:47

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:46

I’m afraid that is your definition gushing sex / not the Bilolgical one

Gushing sex. I think we have got to the root of the issue.

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 16:48

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:46

I’m afraid that is your definition gushing sex / not the Bilolgical one

Sammy, it's really hard to try and discuss if you 1. don't quote the person you're replying to. Use the 'quote' button. It's the first one on the left, below the text box.
and 2. When you make typos that are so opaque I just can't work out what the word is that you meant to use.

Please use the quote function and please check for typos. Wee ones are fine of course, but I really can't work out what 'gushing' means here, for example.

CassOle · 28/08/2025 16:48

'gushing sex'

Oh la la!

Merrymouse · 28/08/2025 16:48

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:39

Yes but dime animals are capable of changing sex and the biggest driver of this is hormones.

The same can be applied to humans

Clown fish are observed to change sex when they change the kind of gametes they produce.

Humans cannot do this.

I don't think anyone on this thread is under the illusion that it is anything other than a time waster, but over the years posters on this board have had some pretty important wins in the courts. If you really want to defend trans rights, my top tip is therefore that campaigning is more successful when it is reality based.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 16:48

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:42

Point taken.

i believe transwomen are women but I accept some people disagree and that’s fine. That’s what a democracy should be about having different opinions.

to clarify I was born a female in Oslo in 1989.

i believe transwomen are women

In what way are they women?

In what way are women women?

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 16:49

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:47

That is correct and unfortunately not all women born keen can either.

In Norway like most Scandinavian countries we believe strongly in equal rights for all groups.

They is why maternity/paternity leave has equal weighting

Okay. In the UK, had the Scottish government one, and 'gc' women lost, trans identifying females would have lost the right to maternity leave. Trans identifying males would have won the right to maternity leave. Do you think that is fair?

Merrymouse · 28/08/2025 16:49

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:47

That is correct and unfortunately not all women born keen can either.

In Norway like most Scandinavian countries we believe strongly in equal rights for all groups.

They is why maternity/paternity leave has equal weighting

You do know which people have the babies don't you?

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:49

Only recently and very poorly and got a very short time.

in reality in the U.K. women take uo tud vast majority of parental leave. In Norway it is far more equal and for far longer.

Im afraid to say the Uk behind Norway socially and economically in do many ways.
Horner I do think the younger generation in the U.K. are far more liberal and will change things for the better in the future.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 16:49

Greyskybluesky · 28/08/2025 16:43

I want to be in a wine prison!!

I need to be in a wine prison after this evening’s barnyard explosion of a thread

Greyskybluesky · 28/08/2025 16:50

Namelessnelly · 28/08/2025 16:47

Ummm… hadn’t an actual nazi just declared he’s trans? In Germany. so I can think you’ll find you’re aligned with the far right. Not us.

This fella, for those who've missed it:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3r4zrg35vlo

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:50

Yes some women can have babies some cannot. They includes women born women at birth

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 16:50

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:44

Hormones.

if you are a biologist you will realise that a number of animals can change sex. The biggest driver of this is hormones.

Yes the odd animal can.

Humans are not one of those animals.

Some animals shed their skins. It doesn’t mean humans can.

Do you understand the difference?

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 16:51

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:49

Only recently and very poorly and got a very short time.

in reality in the U.K. women take uo tud vast majority of parental leave. In Norway it is far more equal and for far longer.

Im afraid to say the Uk behind Norway socially and economically in do many ways.
Horner I do think the younger generation in the U.K. are far more liberal and will change things for the better in the future.

Yes, but the baby comes out of the womb of only one sex. The female sex. This isn't about parental leave. It's about maternity protections.

CassOle · 28/08/2025 16:51

Why do I feel that someone needs to sit Sammy down and say: 'When a Mummy and a Daddy love each other very much...'

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:51

In Norway that is irrelevant as men women transmen and transwomen have the same rights and same time to take parental leave. The UK is in the dark ages with this.

Heggettypeg · 28/08/2025 16:51

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:39

Yes but dime animals are capable of changing sex and the biggest driver of this is hormones.

The same can be applied to humans

@Sammybabes16 Some animals can reproduce by splitting themselves in two, but that doesn't mean humans can do the same. Some can give birth without having had sex. Some, as you say, can actually change sex- in other words they become reproductively functional as the opposite sex. Humans can't do that. No matter how many hormones you stuff into a man, he can never actually change sex and become a woman. Mammals just don't work that way. It's just one of those things, like horses having four legs and spiders having eight.

Merrymouse · 28/08/2025 16:52

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:50

Yes some women can have babies some cannot. They includes women born women at birth

But you understand that no men are pregnant?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.