Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"job loss, violence, vigilantism and wholesale exclusion" following Supreme Court ruling and EHRC guidance

53 replies

IwantToRetire · 20/08/2025 19:04

Enjoy!

"Shocking" new evidence released this week has shone a light on how cis and trans people, since the Supreme Court ruling (FWS vs The Scottish Ministers) in April 2025, face "violence, harassment and exclusion" whether or not they are trying to follow “the new rules”.

“The report tells a story of bullying and exclusion. The Supreme Court, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) and the government have all claimed to care about the dignity and safety of women and trans people. This report proves that by taking the approach of segregation they are failing in that.

“If the government care about discrimination and violence against women they will refuse any EHRC guidance that ends with organisations or individuals policing who goes into which bathroom, and restore equality law to a sound footing.

“But don’t take my word for it. Take it from the many people who have told us their story in this report.

https://www.scenemag.co.uk/trans-and-cisgender-people-face-job-loss-violence-vigilantism-and-wholesale-exclusion-following-supreme-court-ruling-and-ehrc-guidance-report-shows/

Sadly this will now no doubt become a report used to provide "evidence" of how the Supreme Court ruling is anti trans, rather than what it really is, restoring women's sex based rights.

Trans and cisgender people face "job loss, violence, vigilantism and wholesale exclusion" following Supreme Court ruling and EHRC guidance, report shows

"Shocking" new evidence released this week has shone a light on how cis and trans people, since the Supreme Court ruling (FWS vs The Scottish Ministers) in April 2025, face "violence, harassment and exclusion" whether or not they are trying to follow “...

https://www.scenemag.co.uk/trans-and-cisgender-people-face-job-loss-violence-vigilantism-and-wholesale-exclusion-following-supreme-court-ruling-and-ehrc-guidance-report-shows/

OP posts:
deadpan · 22/08/2025 09:07

OneSnappySquid · 22/08/2025 06:01

I'm not a native english speaker, but doesn't this grammar play actually backfire at the TRAs? If a trans woman is a woman who is trans in the same way a black woman is a woman who is black then wouldn't a trans woman be a woman who identifies as trans(a so called transman) and not a man who identifies as trans(a so called transwoman)?

Yes it does when you look at it logically like that but GI isn't known for it's logic.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 22/08/2025 10:01

When I saw the title I thought it would be a serious and balanced look at how the divisions being stoked up by the Trans Activists were resulting in violent protests, attacks and job losses for gender critical women and also increasing verbal or physical agression against people who want to be treated as the opposite sex (I don't know that the latter is the case BTW, it's just what the headline suggested to me). Which would be a really good contribution to a polarised public debate.

What a disappointment.

Merrymouse · 22/08/2025 11:34

If it's true that people have suffered unlawful discrimination, they should certainly take these cases to court. The GLP has built up a huge fund, so financing these cases shouldn't be a problem.

It will be interesting to see what happens...

New posts on this thread. Refresh page