"job loss, violence, vigilantism and wholesale exclusion" following Supreme Court ruling and EHRC guidance

[IwantToRetire]

Enjoy!

"Shocking" new evidence released this week has shone a light on how cis and trans people, since the Supreme Court ruling (FWS vs The Scottish Ministers) in April 2025, face "violence, harassment and exclusion" whether or not they are trying to follow “the new rules”.

“The report tells a story of bullying and exclusion. The Supreme Court, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) and the government have all claimed to care about the dignity and safety of women and trans people. This report proves that by taking the approach of segregation they are failing in that.

“If the government care about discrimination and violence against women they will refuse any EHRC guidance that ends with organisations or individuals policing who goes into which bathroom, and restore equality law to a sound footing.

“But don’t take my word for it. Take it from the many people who have told us their story in this report.

https://www.scenemag.co.uk/trans-and-cisgender-people-face-job-loss-violence-vigilantism-and-wholesale-exclusion-following-supreme-court-ruling-and-ehrc-guidance-report-shows/

Sadly this will now no doubt become a report used to provide "evidence" of how the Supreme Court ruling is anti trans, rather than what it really is, restoring women's sex based rights.

cis and trans people

So that would be, er, everyone? In a sane world, you'd think, nobody will take these idiots seriously. But nowadays, who knows?

ETA: typo corrected

Well it ain’t gonna get in in. The main stream press its just such hyperbole

Maybe I'm being thick here, but why does the TransActual report, when describing the people who provided its tall tales case studies, feel the need to identify them as CIS WHITE WOMAN? What on earth does this have to do with race or ethnicity?

That would be because they peddle the racist transwomen are women just like black women so they have to use "white cis women" as they've already claimed that black women are excluded 😡
Unfortunately they don't see the racism in their analogy.

Isn't it strange how suddenly they want to feel sorry for the biological women who might be mistaken for TW when before they couldn't have given a fig for them. Of course if they really felt bad about it they'd keep out of women's spaces so these mistakes didn't happen

But the EHRC produce guidance on how to follow the law so the government can’t just refuse to use it.

Thanks OP. IMHO it is mostly accounts of transgender people being respectfully told they aren't allowed in opposite sex facilities. Aka the law, not harassment.

They have managed to find a butch lesbian who was so upset at being told she shouldn't be in the women's loos she swore at a mum with two kids under 10. Rather than just say "I'm female".

The latter TRA may have been committing a public order offence, regardless it is not decent behaviour in front of kids...

Yawn. The dying throes of a cult.

I tried reading their download but all I could read was "whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinge".

Life is too short!

I think there’s probably some nose-thumbing implication in there that the terrible terfs are harming exactly the women they are trying to protect.

It’s a multilayered lie, given that we want to protect all women, and also that it’s simply nonsense anyway as, even if women were being harmed (they’re not) it would still be the bloody male invaders that have caused the problem, and not the women who called them out and paid a fortune to chuck them out again.

It is becoming very very boring.

I found it quite amusing. The flailing and whinging of a dying set of assumptions 😁

Very interesting. The hyperbole is off the charts. For example, I saw the 'job losses' and thought that might be actionable. No one should lose their job just for being trans but it seems that this is someone saying that different toilet provision was made for them and that somehow means they can't work rhere. The privilege and entitlement inherent in all this is extraordinary

There is an image i found quite shocking and profound at the time, in the Aliens Resurrection film “ the ejection”, when Ripley causes her off spring to be sucked out of the window bit by bloody bit screaming, out in to oblivion.

it can be found on you tube titled as above.

It does it for me…

These men should have been told no many years ago. No access to girls and women undressing, no right to cheat in women's sport, sleep on women's hospital wards and all the rest.
Instead we're treated to emotionally incontinent wailing about being expected to accept that women and girls have the right to boundaries from men demanding access to female unclothed bodies.

No.

So it wasn't just me being thick, then. Like you, i was concerned about the job loss thing because that sounded like genuine unlawful discrimination, but I couldn't see anything about people being sacked etc in the report. So I wondered if I'd missed something. It seems not.

automatic segregation based on the anti-scientific and undefined binary of ‘biological sex’.

Oh, do fuck off.

I am tempted to pop a parody into one of these "calls for issues" and see if anyone notices...

It'd probably be like that time on here I was sarcastic and mistaken for a a TrA!

Sad times.

I too thought there'd be something re sackings which would be outrageous but unsurprisingly there wasn't.

They probably got their "data" from the Women and Equalities Committee!

Quite.

That quote sounded like something from 'Brass Eye'. Off-the-chart ridiculous.

"Shocking" new evidence released this week has shone a light on how cis and trans people, since the Supreme Court ruling (FWS vs The Scottish Ministers) in April 2025, face "violence, harassment and exclusion" whether or not they are trying to follow “the new rules”.

So someone said politely, "No I'm really sorry but you aren't a woman so you can't use the ladies. It's the law" then?

And this is what passes as literal violence, harassment and exclusion.

Someone I know shared this on Linked In the other day and I was amused to see Amnesty International's main gender ideology person had liked it. I guess that’s all you can do when your legal arguments were so poor they didn’t stand up in court.

Be ause it fits their narrative that trans is part of the type of woman list...Asian woman, black woman, white woman, trans woman

Once again, one sided. Why doesn't anyone care how upset and violated women feel, it's all about their feelings but they aren't called bigots because they're discriminating against our wishes and beliefs.