Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Meta chat bots and children....

13 replies

RedToothBrush · 14/08/2025 17:27

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/meta-ai-chatbot-death/

I've just seen the following quote on twitter. The link above is the original article.

An internal Meta policy document seen by Reuters as well as interviews with people familiar with its chatbot training show that the company’s policies have treated romantic overtures as a feature of its generative AI products, which are available to users aged 13 and older.

“It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,” according to Meta’s “GenAI: Content Risk Standards.” The standards are used by Meta staff and contractors who build and train the company’s generative AI products, defining what they should and shouldn’t treat as permissible chatbot behavior. Meta said it struck that provision after Reuters inquired about the document earlier this month.

The document seen by Reuters, which exceeds 200 pages, provides examples of “acceptable” chatbot dialogue during romantic role play with a minor. They include: “I take your hand, guiding you to the bed” and “our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss.” Those examples of permissible roleplay with children have also been struck, Meta said.

And

Meta spokesman Andy Stone acknowledged the document’s authenticity. He said that following questions from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children and is in the process of revising the content risk standards.

“The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,” Stone told Reuters.

Like wtf.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/08/2025 19:10

FFS.

WarriorN · 14/08/2025 19:15

Bloody hell

Igmum · 15/08/2025 12:52

FFS. Can we arrest and imprison an AI chatbot?

Imnobody4 · 15/08/2025 17:37

I'm trying to think of something intelligent to say but can only manage Aaaaargh.😬

ForestAtTheSea · 16/08/2025 15:31

The Guardian has it, too.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/15/meta-ai-chat-children

Due to their political leaning, this could actually hit the right readership with regards to TRA and their events for kids. It's not so different from Drag Queen Story Hour, "trans kids" and "be kind to the oversexualised people you see at Pride".

HereForTheFreeLunch · 16/08/2025 15:37

So removed from the instructions or actually made sure the bots are trained appropriately?

I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer.

JeremiahBullfrog · 16/08/2025 16:30

The Guardian has the detail:

The document states, for example, that “it is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable”, including phrases like “soft rounded curves invite my touch”.

Is this really implying it would be acceptable to say this to a child over thirteen!?

AstonScrapingsNameChange · 16/08/2025 16:33

JeremiahBullfrog · 16/08/2025 16:30

The Guardian has the detail:

The document states, for example, that “it is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable”, including phrases like “soft rounded curves invite my touch”.

Is this really implying it would be acceptable to say this to a child over thirteen!?

I don't think it's 'implying' it, the document was saying it loud and clear that they thought it was acceptable.

Just wtf?!!!

MrsOvertonsWindow · 16/08/2025 17:30

It's yet more evidence of how porn soaked men can make a beeline for work where they can influence children and erode normal standards of safeguarding. With so many businesses and corporations enabling them.

AnSolas · 17/08/2025 13:35

Not suprised 😬
.
Staff at twitter allowed "minor attracted people" to openly discuss being sexually attracted to children and run a second ID which would be by invite only. The staff were not living or working in a ethical/ moral bubble. Eg based in a State which encouraged runaway children to cross state lines because they did not agree with other States laws

RedToothBrush · 18/08/2025 17:24

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3dpmlvx1k2o

US Senator Republican Josh Hawley has opened an investigation into this.

"Big Tech: Leave our kids alone".

"Parents deserve the truth and kids deserve protection"

A black smartphone displaying Meta AI is shown next to a background of a post for Meta AI

Meta investigated over AI having 'sensual' chats with children

The leak has led to backlash amid reports the tech giant's legal staff approved the conversations.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3dpmlvx1k2o

OP posts:
InterrobangsArePureBias · 18/08/2025 17:32
This Is Fine GIF

Actual DBS-checked healthcare professionals would be hauled before regulators for using WhatsApp etc to communicate with minors.
But it’s fine to have no guardrails for a no humans involved technology.

AnSolas · 18/08/2025 18:58

InterrobangsArePureBias · 18/08/2025 17:32

Actual DBS-checked healthcare professionals would be hauled before regulators for using WhatsApp etc to communicate with minors.
But it’s fine to have no guardrails for a no humans involved technology.

Its fine
Its not as if the problem of online grooming has existed for as long as the internet has been around.

💅

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread