I see that I wasn't clear enough in the way that I wrote about "womanface".
I am not claiming that drag artists pretend to be women in everyday life.
Drag artists are performers who have an act, where their stage character is that of a fantastical woman. It is designed to entertain an audience. It is part of the rich world of theatre. The performance may be elegant and beautiful or it may be coarse and bawdy, there may be other aspects to the performance too. When the performance is finished, the drag artist removes their costume and make up. They are their ordinary selves most of the time, unless preparing for, rehearsing or playing a performance.
I do not agree that the definition of "womanface" includes drag artists. Drag artist are performers and they have an exaggerated character portrayal of their chosen character, and that is art. It is an act, for the stage. They have a specific woman character who is their stage presence. They are acting and performing. Nobody imagines an actor playing Hamlet pretends to be Hamlet all the time.
A man putting on women's make-up and pretending to be/imagining that they are now/expecting everybody to treat them as/ a woman is something that now seems to be called "womanface". That seems to be a lifestyle choice and not a profession of any kind.
I think the term womanface is absolutely loathsome. I think the term itself demeans women.
People haven't really defined the term as far as I can tell, so no doubt I will be told that I am completely wrong, but I do not think that womanface is anything to do with the art of performance or theatre, whereas drag is all about the art of performance and theatre. Theatre is a separate world from everyday life. It is an art and a craft and people need to work hard to be in it. Drag artists are not doing it for a laugh or to convince their friends, it is hard work and they put a lot of energy into their performance and their stage persona, relaxing once they are off stage.