Giggle V Tickle in court August 4

[TheKhakiQuail]

Feminists in the UK seem to have an enormous amount of momentum in the UK - the wins keep coming. Here in Australia, things are moving very slowly. However, the Giggle v Tickle appeal is coming up on 4-7th August before a Federal Court panel. It will be livestreamed.

I will add the link below if anyone is up for some gardening it is much needed.

I am not close to the case, but there are some pleasing updates - the Lesbian Action Group has been given permission to intervene, and they have a very clever and well-versed in feminism legal team of Megan Blake and Leigh Howard. I wasn't particularly impressed with the legal arguments put forward in court in the first round, but there is a new SC (like a KC) on the team - don't know of him except he does work for the richest woman in Australia, so hopefully he knows how to make a good case too.

In other developments, Jillian Spencer, a psychiatrist in Queensland who was suspended for criticising pediatric gender medicine at her hospital is bringing several lawsuits, including discrimination on the grounds of belief. She is probably an excellent claimant for lawfare. And a convicted murderer in NSW applied to be moved from a male to a female prison, but the NSW government seems to be ruling that out despite having just brought in self-id and having allowed it before (maybe the sexual assault allegations that occurred previously would be more damaging if repeated in the current climate). It may have opened some eyes though.

low whistle

Absolutely crazy.

Thanks for updates everyone.

😆 I’ll have to tell him that. He’s received mail address to Ms Unisex name in the past. He’s well and truly peaked now. Taught him about AGPs. Plus the be kind attitude he used to have quickly disappeared at the thought of an AGP going into the women’s toilets while our teen DD is in there. That saw a jaw clench and his hands clench and unclench.

I have watched a bit of Dr. Az Hakeem who reports that most TRA's specifically are transvestites (who get a kick out of getting in and out of womens spaces) and people with autism who struggle to emotionally regulate when being denied to live their life according to their own (strict) reality.

He said that AGPs are actually very rare (they just seem so common because of the narcissim of online) and are usually the ones that go through with the surgery. But most trans women are transvestites.

this female judge is saying she can’t tell the sex of big Roxy?

is she on glue?

@Seriestwo No, she says big Roxie is a woman.

.... becuase he has a certificate

And removes (some of) his hair. And shops in the ladies section of Kmart. Don’t ever forget what makes you a woman.

and a woman’s top and a woman’s hairstyle.

Maybe if you need a certificate, or a top, or a haircut to show you are a woman..... you are not ... in fact... a woman.

Oh for one of Giggle’s female lawyers to turn up in a male cut suit with cropped hair and men’s style shoes tomorrow, while the male lawyer turns up with light makeup, a blouse, and a skirt suit with a low heeled pump.

then ask the judge “do you think we’ve both changed sex”.

I know that can’t but it’s what would happen in a movie.

Yes..... yes yes yes....

and joined a women only app

I shop in both the women’s and men’s sections of Kmart. Last night I wore men’s pj pants with a men’s t-shirt but underwear from the women’s section of Target. Actually for most of winter I wear men’s t-shirts because I find them more comfortable and roomier than women’s. In the warmer weather I’m in dresses. Maybe my sex is weather dependent. I’ve never dyed my hair or been waxed. Man points. Oh no!

What is a ‘woman’s top’? A pink blouse with flowers? A little white pixie t shirt?

‘top’ 🙄🙄🤮😡

Do they mean fake tits? Say fcking fake tits.

And whilst you’re at it Aussie court, start using plain English language. Stop using gender woo bollocks language, because none of it makes sense.

You can’t knit using saucy spaghetti mixed with chewing gum.

In the Supreme Court judgment in the UK, the judges said, according to long-established principles of legal interpretation, that a term in a statute needs to mean the same thing throughout because if it means different things in different places that can lead to considerable legal uncertainty.

Assuming that the judge in this case is talking about the same thing, that is surprising. And worrying for how this will go.

So it's not going well. As predicted.

Is it a bad sign that the court is calling him she/her?

I'm in the UK and reading your comments with baited breath.

It is quite insane that this is even happening. How on earth can the judge think it's fine & dandy for any word of significance to have variable meanings across different statutes or parts of them? Let's take marriage, which is deemed a societally significant state. It couldn't work if in one statute a couple were deemed to be married and in another they were deemed to be unmarried. Bonkers. This judge looks to be a post-modernist and believes that there's no such thing as truth and that all boundaries can/must be erased.

This is so dangerous.

I’m not don’t have the legal background to understand the context of all their references but this seems to be a mess.

Sweet suffering Jesus 🤯

How did they manage to get into law??

Exactly and where is the ability to say ‘if I sign my male dog up are they now a human female too?’

From this case so far, it looks like the legal profession lets anyone in, in Australia. There’s no critical thinking, there’s no critical analysis of information, and there’s no scientific reasoning. Truly atrocious.

Some interesting discussion happening on Kit Kowalski’s Twitter Space. The speakers on there think it might not be quite so dire but regardless it will go to the next level of appeal in the High Court.

https://x.com/i/spaces/1OyKALLAvkaxb

https://x.com/KowalskiKit/status/1952309167928254899

Gah I started to listen to that but they’re trying to analyse the gobbledegook spoken in court, which frankly, is painful. Or they’re trying to make sense of the nonsense. This is awful.