LinkedIn Persona vs X

[mumsandaunties]

I’ve just been reading a sad story of a professional 50 something TiM forced to wet himself outside the toilets as he was forced out of the ladies by a gang of horrible mean GC women.

The LinkedIn comments are a predictable wall of gush…how dreadful, how disgusting and mean and cruel we women are. No change there.

But it took me all of two seconds to google this person and discover that he’s a very different character on X. Famous for creating a kill list of TERFs to murder which was reported to the police and made the Daily Mail.

I’m desperate to post a comment on his LinkedIn post so that these well meaning idiot people realise just what kind of person they are saying should be allowed in women’s spaces. However that would be committing career suicide. It’s made me realise just how far we still have to go… even with the law on our side, expressing an opinion without the shield of anonymity is still terrifying.

Send me the details. I have a fake LinkedIn account with no career to sacrifice ☺️

Maybe I should get one of those myself. An alter ego afraid of no-one. LinkedIn is the worst of the social media platforms for anonymity…fair enough as it’s a professional network…but you can’t even ‘like’ a post without it notifying half the people you’ve ever met!

TERFs should all set up fake accounts and then connect with each other to look more real 😁

I’m staying silent on this issue on LinkedIn - career suicide - my peers are all TWAW 🙄 and all the gush. Nauseating. I also keep reading that we can allow TiM in the women’s if we chose ? This contradicts the EHRC ruling doesn’t it? There is going to be lots of tribunals I’m sure.

What are the chances that he has a fetish for wetting himself and is now getting off on the attention it’s getting?

Edit: apologies didn’t mean to quote.

I am quite shocked by the number of people in my network who are posting information and opinion that’s just plain wrong, on a platform that is basically a living CV/reference for any future employer!

I know that lots of people are desperate to virtue signal, but it shows how reality-proof the echo chambers are when people are rushing to pontificate on how the Supreme Court have “got it wrong” and fawn over the sad-face story of a thoroughly unpleasant TRA.

Why is it always about piss? They are obsessed.

Does this person offer an explanation of why he chose to set himself rather than use the men’s , which he is legally entitled to do?

Only the fact that he transitioned at 18 so presumably have been happily transgressing women’s boundaries for nearly forty years and wouldn’t dream of going in the men’s.

TRA’s who’ve been behaving in this way aren’t about to change. I get that. What gets to me is the enabling idiots saying “there, there…aren’t those women nasty” without a clue who they are supporting.

Me too. I’m honestly finding it depressing. Guess that’s part of the problem with us all being in echo chambers much of the time. LinkedIn is much less so that other social media. Easy for both sides to believe they’re on top.

Don’t forget that the only safe opinion to express in is support of this man. There will be many others reading and thinking exactly the same as you. Those voices are only starting to be heard now, but the barriers to expressing them are weakening.

They, more often than not, have multiple fetishes.

Who is it? Racking my brains.

Someone (not me) has copied the post onto Twitter/X

https://x.com/FruellaDeBrille/status/1916161952386056575

Ffs. What do these men think!!!

just happened to bump into a bunch of gender critical women, who happen to recognise him, who happened to know about the law, who happened to tell him to fuck off, and all other avenues of toileting were closed, because no radar key.

These people. It's moronic

Hilarious thing is, actual women who for some reason were unable to get into the ladies toilet and were in genuine imminent danger of losing continence in seconds would:

1. use the disabled (sorry disabled people)
2. Go into the gents yelling "sorry gents I need to come in and use the loo"
3. Last resort - squat down in the least exposed position, take down their trousers + knickers / hitch up their skirt and pee

What no women ever would do is not even try and get out of her clothes before she pissed herself.

He’s put the same post on X as LinkedIn…but the difference between the comments is quite something.

LinkedIn: “Gush, gush, poor you, it’s cruel and obscene”.

X:”Seriously? You could have used the gents but decided a dirty protest was more appropriate”

I know X is full of pretty awful trolls, but LinkedIn is more dangerous, because sensible people are silenced by fear.

I would file that Tweet under things that never happened.

Oh, that one.

That bloke is a raving lunatic. There’s a handful of TA who are very proactive with borderline bogus legal threats etc.

As the great Doc Bastard once said: of all the things that never happened, this never happened the most.

That person has been complaining of the devastating violence inflicted upon themself by gender critical women in toilets for years (eg. 11/04/2022).

As@FlirtsWithRhinossays as an actual woman I would use other facilities rather then wet myself.