Is anyone else pissed off at how TRA are now positioning TIMs in our spaces as protecting women?n i our gn

[Campinthe50s]

The latest argument is that having TIMs in our spaces protects women who are a bit butch or masculine looking from being ' challenged' , so really, they are protecting us from this apparently awful and unbearable misunderstanding.

They've moved seamlessly from 'Women, men are going to hurt you anyway, so stop trying to make it harder for them with your single sex spaces.' To, 'really mixed sex spaces are for your own good, women, as we don't want any slightly masculine women's feelings to get hurt!'

Their sudden apparent centring of the feelings of women is touching, really.

I guess maybe they are too young to remember the days prior to gender bollocks where single sex spaces worked just fine...and certainly better than mixed sex spaces do...

A little bit bur I'm more pissed off about the fact that now they find tifs useful they've suddenly remembered that they exist

They will always find an angle. They will always find a way to spin it so they can keep demanding what they want. This is a key one.

Yes, in the first few days after the SC ruling they suddenly became concerned about TIFs and butch lesbians. They now seem to be trying to expand this into a concern for ALL women.

So nice of them to think of us!

Women are only ever for the purpose of serving men's interests.

The endless burbly attempts at reasons why men HAVE to get their little behinds into women's spaces will go on. The plus side is that they no longer make the slightest difference.