Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Christine Jardine MP: Ensure rights that trans people have freely used for decades are not overturned

144 replies

SidewaysOtter · 22/04/2025 07:28

Lib Dem spokesperson for Women and Equalities. Guess she doesn’t care so much about the “women” part of that title, eh? 🙄

Christine Jardine MP: Ensure rights that trans people have freely used for decades are not overturned
OP posts:
ThatCyanCat · 28/04/2025 16:44

TemporarilyChangedToday · 28/04/2025 13:06

What a load of vitriol and 'whataboutery' on Mumsnet today! I sincerely hope this does not represent everyone on here...

The problem that some women have with some men is undoubtedly real. But trans-folk in general are not the right target.

In fact even taking a 'women first' stance, this solves little, whilst it certainly makes life more terrifying for those decent trans men (biologically women) and trans women (biologically men) who you want to use toilets mismatched to their gender-presentation, for example, despite them perhaps up I til now being able to live without having to constantly 'out' themselves. When a male-identifying person comes in to your women-only space, you are no further forward in terms of being able to challenge (if that's what you want to do).

If the aim of law and legislation is to minimise harm, then the trans community needs protecting (and given the vitriol here we can see why). Anyone with trans friends will be aware of a litany of assaults, abuse and discrimination that trans people experience. Up until now trans folks have tended to use spaces where they 'pass' best where they can for very obvious reasons.

There is very little evidence that trans women (biological men) as a whole are disproportionately dangerous to women. Of course some are (as are other non-trans men and women). Whereas there is abundant evidence that non-trans women and men are abusive to trans folks, particularly trans women.

It is not a competition!!. Women's rights to safety are not in opposition to trans folks rights to safety. The triumphalism and hatred displayed in some of these mumsnet posts today seem to me to completely miss a human response, and fly in the face of evidence too.

Whether someone accepts or not the court's conclusion (that sex means biological sex) the priority now must be minimising harm for all, which requires much less demonising and rabble rousing.

Of course I expect that for me right now too....

Trans people have exactly the same rights as everyone else and for the exact same reasons. Use spaces for your sex or mixed sex ones.

Access to naked women and girls is not a false affirmation therapy for deluded men and I truly do not understand how people don't see how creepy and rapey they are being by insisting that it is a human right.

DiaAssolellat · 28/04/2025 16:51

TheOtherRaven · 28/04/2025 15:28

Sorry for over posting, this absolutely infuriates me.... 'damaging'

It WAS damaging for women. IT HAS BEEN damaging for women. The purpose of getting this law clarified was to STOP THE DAMAGE TO WOMEN.

Edited

This can’t be said enough. Thank you.

And I raise a glass or several of the finest champagne to @MrsOvertonsWindow and @RhannionKPSS and all the other fabulously well informed, clear minded and clever women on this board 🥂🥂🥂

JellySaurus · 28/04/2025 16:58

a litany of assaults, abuse and discrimination that trans people experience.

Given the trans worldview where disagreement is framed as literal violence, I suspect that what you understand by assault, abuse and discrimination is very different to most women's understanding and experience.

Up until now trans folks have tended to use spaces where they 'pass' best where they can for very obvious reasons.

Where they passed, or where they believed they passed because women were too uncomfortable to challenge them?

There is very little evidence that trans women (biological men) as a whole are disproportionately dangerous to women. Of course some are (as are other non-trans men and women).

How are we to tell the difference between harmless trans-IDing men and malevolent men? Good men stay out so that bad men stand out.

Women's rights to safety are not in opposition to trans folks rights to safety.

Absolutely. So men should stop 'dealing with' toxic male aggression by putting men into women's spaces.

Nomoreidea · 28/04/2025 17:07

JDEdin · 22/04/2025 07:33

Ugh. She’s my MP, I was planning to write to her but I suppose I know the response I will get now.

She's my MP too, we must be terfy neighbours. Do you have C-H as your MSP?

I wrote to CJ ages ago about this, must see if I can find the reply. It wasn't good.

JDEdin · 28/04/2025 17:33

Nomoreidea · 28/04/2025 17:07

She's my MP too, we must be terfy neighbours. Do you have C-H as your MSP?

I wrote to CJ ages ago about this, must see if I can find the reply. It wasn't good.

Yes C-H as well, he’s been quite helpful on some childcare stuff previously but sent a similar reply to CJ on this topic this week. Nice to know I’ve got some sensible neighbours!

Nomoreidea · 28/04/2025 17:42

I Remember he spoke against the Forensic services bill that would have enabled rape victims to choose the sex rather than the gender of their examiners. @JDEdin

BiologicalRobot · 28/04/2025 19:35

TemporarilyChangedToday · 28/04/2025 15:01

There are many perfectly reasonable views. One of which is the conclusion reached by the Supreme Court. The court ruled specifically on the definition of biological sex in legislation.

It's the surrounding polarised debate about how this could be implemented or what it actually means that is so damaging in the opinion of many of us. People have becomes so 'competitive' about rights and so lacking in compassion for 'others'.

Unless I have missed the posts, literally no one on these boards has any empathy or interest for how terrifying the current situation is for trans folks. I am a woman (and mum) but clearly not welcome here.

But I guess we will all continue in our echo chambers...

literally no one on these boards has any empathy or interest for how terrifying the current situation is for trans folks.

< snorts >
I take it you have no empathy or interest for how terrifying the past decade has been for women and girls when confronted with a male in their single sex spaces? The law hasn't changed. Those men (of any kind) were deliberately breaking the law.

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 28/04/2025 19:42

Unless I have missed the posts, literally no one on these boards has any empathy or interest for how terrifying the current situation is for trans folks.

yeah youve missed those posts

Waitwhat23 · 28/04/2025 19:44

The current situation that rape crisis services can (and always have been allowed, despite the deliberate misleading by lobby groups) offer female single sex rape crisis services?

If you're trying to claim that that is 'terrifying' for transpeople, then you (and they) need to take a fucking good hard look at yourselves. The lack of empathy for women has always been stark but the footstamping vitriolic bullshite against women over the last two weeks about a judgement which simply clarified the existing guidance in the EQA2010 must have opened many eyes.

Echo chamber? I'll take that with an enormous pinch of salt given that gender ideology is the epitomy of an echo chamber.

lcakethereforeIam · 28/04/2025 19:44

I do wish one of the scolders would take their post and put it, with a few contextual tweaks, on a board used by tras or one of the tra subreddits. Then come back and tells us what reception telling them to 'be kind' got. Or how dressing them down for 'vitriol' was received. I'm picturing anything from bans and deletions right up to being reported to the Police and possibly getting a NCHI.

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 28/04/2025 19:57

I am a woman (and mum) but clearly not welcome here

i doubt youve been told this, but just in case you have point me to the post and i will report it….I don’t think you will though

JDEdin · 28/04/2025 23:08

Nomoreidea · 28/04/2025 17:42

I Remember he spoke against the Forensic services bill that would have enabled rape victims to choose the sex rather than the gender of their examiners. @JDEdin

Ugh, yes I assume all the LDs will have done. I told him in my email last week that although we’ve had positive interactions in the past I won’t vote for someone who is against the SC judgment.

FlowchartRequired · 29/04/2025 08:28

Hopefully @TemporarilyChangedToday will be providing those examples today. I am still interested in seeing them.

lcakethereforeIam · 29/04/2025 11:04

Following a link someone posted I came across this in the Scotsman

https://archive.ph/1AeN6

https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/if-standing-up-for-trans-rights-makes-me-woke-at-least-that-shows-i-care-5100111

There's so much I could post about this self-serving pish but I restrict myself. Prior to trans rights becoming the fashionable cause du jour the few tw and tm went about their lives. They used the ladies and we didn't notice or noticed and didn't care or cared but gritted our teeth. It was genuinely a vanishingly small number and, we assumed probably correctly, they'd had all the surgeries. Everyone was rubbing along with very little friction. Then the activists, like Christine, seized on the issue. Twaw, they don't need surgeries, any male with a lady brain (he she knows his her gender, bigot. Rude! Just don't look) can get naked with female strangers, calling women women is hateful, you're a bleeder and you're fired. Transkids...what?... oh yes, definitely a thing. Untested and irrevocable drugs and then surgery or you might as well murder them. All the mind-boggling, stupid shit the tras, like her, spouted and supported. Had taught in schools. Spaffed millions to proselytise. Defeated, for now and not completely, by a small group of courageous, intelligent, extraordinary, ordinary women supported by pin money and one wealthy woman. Not by the millions given to the tras by Governments, rich trans individuals and also pin money from ordinary souls sucked into this shitshow. So here we are. And the vanishingly small number of tp are weeping in the wreckage while the architects of the crash, like Christine, the other tras and some tp <coughMcCloudcough>, completely fail to see where the blame really lies.

Reminds me of the story of the King who spent years and much gold building an elaborate tomb around the grave of his beloved wife. Before deciding that the grave, with its simple headstone, ruined it and just had to go.

JDEdin · 23/05/2025 19:05

Seems like my emails to her are having zero effect other than giving her staff a task to complete to reply to me. 🙄

Christine Jardine MP: Ensure rights that trans people have freely used for decades are not overturned
Waitwhat23 · 23/05/2025 19:25

I always feel sorry for anyone in Edinburgh West who isn't mired in this madness. Their elected representatives include the dim Christine, Alex 'did it all for Beth' Cole-Hamilton, Alison Johnstone, Sarah Boyack and...

Lorna 'I'm the Gingerbread man' Slater.

Holy hell.

MarieDeGournay · 24/05/2025 13:13

I think you are all being perfectly beastly to Christine!

Credit where credit is due - she managed to write a whole letter about the trans response to the Supreme Court ruling without ever once mentioning toilets!

She only refers to non-specific 'anxiety' and 'fear' [of what??] and 'impact', but not to toilets.

That's quite an achievement - what other TRA/trans ally can you think of who could write a whole page about the SC ruling, without hesitation, repetition or deviation, and without mentioning toilets?
😄

Peregrina · 24/05/2025 14:59

I resigned my LibDem membership because of this nonsense.

CatietteX · 24/05/2025 15:37

I’ve got a reply from my LD MP which is tellingly similar to those quoted earlier. Wholly unsuited to my initial email and bizarrely focussed on toxicity.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread