SecEd is a publication that is read by many who work in secondary education. It purports to publish articles on best practice in secondary education.
I have just read an article advising on how to support CYP with gender dysphoria, post the Cass Review. It presents high risk of suicide as fact and refers to ‘feeling born in the wrong body’ without highlighting the problems with this conceptualisation. It even goes down the ‘sex isn’t binary’ route.
What strikes me about the article is that instead of criticising the Cass Review, the article is written as though there is no conflict between the advice given in the article and that provided by the Cass Review. I’m guessing this is a new strategy as the strategy to ‘de bunk’ it has failed.
Here is the editor’s email, should you wish to point out how irresponsible and ill informed the article is:
[email protected]
Here is the article:
https://buff.ly/8t0VGMx