Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Helen Webberly Gender GP: RED FLAG

102 replies

Mayyouleave · 29/03/2025 01:40

Helen Webberly of Gender GP posted a video comparing protecting women's sports with a mouth swab for sex verification to auschwitz.

Webberly GenderGP

https://x.com/DreyfusJames/status/1905691993449398681

OP posts:
AnonMedic · 09/04/2025 13:32

ArabellaScott · 09/04/2025 13:07

Thanks, AnonMedic, that's interesting. It's all a bit murky, isn't it?

I've lost a fair bit of respect for the GMC recently. Dr Upton being de-regged and re-regged as female, for one. Another doctor convicted of sexual abuse and yet not struck off, somehow.

I'm not clear what exactly it would take to bring the profession into disrepute.

I suspect that in this case it may be as simple as HW deciding that the benefits of remaining registered w/o license weren't worth the annual registration fee - which would fit with the administrative erasure. And I wouldn't blame her for that, as it's not cheap and she isn't working as a doctor.

I don't know what counts as bringing the profession into disrepute in this context either, but I suspect that the bar would be high. I haven't watched the HW videos, but I suspect I would find them offensive - but I don't have a right not to be offended, and I'm not sure what the GMC would do about them without setting a precedent for interfering with speech that I don't find offensive but others do. (In contrast, for example, if Dr X were practicing medicine without an active license I would expect the GMC to take action.)

The censoring of registrant history if the registrant changes their registered gender was clearly wrong - and I'm glad that some action will be taken on that! I think the Upton case has brought a lot of things that many weren't aware of into public discussion, and this is a good thing.

Personally I don't see why either sex or gender should be on the register - it is not on the register for other registered professions. For example, here is NC's entry with the BSB. It includes her (presumably chosen) title - but not her gender identity or sex https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/barristers-register/14DB5C31616875217081E610589639AA.html Of course, one might make the argument that a patient has a more valid interest in the sex of their doctor than the sex of their lawyer - and I would certainly agree with that - but in an emergency you don't look up a doctor's registered gender with the GMC, you look at the doctor in front of you to see if they are male or female and then give your consent (or not). And if you go eg to outpatients, you are not always aware in advance of the name of the consultant you will see - and even if you do know, that person may not be there, or you may see another team member anyway. (So you may be able to look up the name on the register before attending, but you might not end up seeing that person.)

If a patient finds out after the event that the doctor they saw was not the sex they had been led to believe, the registered sex or gender of the doctor doesn't change the fact that this breach has happened. (Although seeing the registered gender may alter how the patient feels harmed.)

I don't know what the answer is. I do know that a lot more people are thinking critically about this since the Peggie tribunal - and I wonder whether those who might want to take some sort of action about this issue are waiting to find out the outcome of FWS before deciding which action(s) to take (or not).

(There was a Michael Foran sub stack post recently, yesterday I think, about same sex intimate care which may be of interest 🙂)

Barrister Details - Ms Naomi Brigid Cunningham

https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/barristers-register/14DB5C31616875217081E610589639AA.html

ArabellaScott · 09/04/2025 13:36

If sex is registered, it needs to be on the basis of sex. Gender or gender identity is not relevant to anything or anyone.

AnonMedic · 09/04/2025 14:38

ArabellaScott · 09/04/2025 13:36

If sex is registered, it needs to be on the basis of sex. Gender or gender identity is not relevant to anything or anyone.

I think we all agree with that!

Seriestwo · 09/04/2025 14:45

I’m not a psychiatrist but I’d be interested in a psychiatrists opinion of her behaviour.

she is grandiose and speaks as if she is a saviour. Which is dangerous around vulnerable people

ArabellaScott · 09/04/2025 15:25

Seriestwo · 09/04/2025 14:45

I’m not a psychiatrist but I’d be interested in a psychiatrists opinion of her behaviour.

she is grandiose and speaks as if she is a saviour. Which is dangerous around vulnerable people

I did notice the emotive and grandiose terms - trans people are 'beautiful', for example. Odd descriptor. What doctor describes their patients as 'beautiful'?

Also the strange infantilisation - what doctor refers to breasts as 'bosoms'?

Seriestwo · 09/04/2025 15:32

her speech is odd too, this is a woman with a case amount of education and public speaking experience. She speaks very quickly, rapid fire, but with lots of ums and ehms and sometimes doesn’t finish her sentence or nail her point.

I don’t know what any of that means, but it reminds me of being around someone who’s using Coke. I’m not suggesting she does that, just noticing there is something unusual about her speech

NameChange0101010101 · 09/04/2025 17:29

Reminds me of that nutty psychiatrist who set up the crowd funder for Upton.

IIRC from her twitter, she also supports males breast feeding babies 🙄

How are these people scientists? It beggars belief.

FannyCann · 13/04/2025 22:11

I can't find the thread (I'm sure there is one) about the Darlington nurses, but Helen Webberley has reported one of the nurses to the NMC.

"Dr Helen Webberley has taken it upon herself to target ONE of the Darlington Nurses Bethany Hutchinson, in a letter to the Fitness to Practise Directoral, Nursing and Midwifery Council & is promoting a petition demanding that she be ‘struck off’…"

https://x.com/FoxyRoxRoxy/status/1911007731013612007

https://x.com/FoxyRoxRoxy/status/1911007731013612007

lcakethereforeIam · 13/04/2025 22:21

She's a real piece of work!

WithSilverBells · 13/04/2025 23:26

I've complained to Change.org.
Report a policy violation link is below the introductory 'The Issue' blurb on the petition website

SeethingHarpie · 14/04/2025 03:52

That letter, video and petition have exactly the opposite impact that HW is (I assume) seeking….

She appears evangelical, obsessed, incoherent, divorced from reality and entirely hypocritical.

68 comments (can’t read them, not on twix), 100 likes, 37 retweets and 5600 views. 😳

Her actions and message are shining mega-watts of sunlight on the delusions, hypocrisy and incoherence of GI.

ArabellaScott · 15/04/2025 10:39

Her actions and message are shining mega-watts of sunlight on the delusions, hypocrisy and incoherence of GI.

100%. :D

Another day, another HW interview. Today it's 'The God Cast'.

It's a doozy.

'...I've just been somebody who's always wanted the world to be nice and right and happy.'
...

' I met someone the other day who, um, has not told anybody about their transgender feelings. Um, so, they're living as a man completely as a man, looks like a man, voice like a man, name of a man. Absolutely. But you know, um, they disclose to me that actually deep down inside the most tremendously strong feelings that actually they are a woman.

And I just felt I felt really sad in my heart that this person has to lie to to herself or himself whichever we way we call it. But, uh, so, the the external image is all
masculine. The internal feelings that all his friends and work colleagues -everyone thinks that it's a man, and it's not It's a woman. It's that suppression that having to hide it having to not be authentic having to to pretend to be
something you're not.'
...

'Let's take, um, Dave, who's 6'5, um, and Dave has transitioned and is undergoing transition to to be the woman that Dave is, um, if you like. And so then there comes the time when Dave - if we carry on calling her Dave - um, has to decide which bathroom she goes to. And so we have two choices. Let's, let's imagine in our mind's eye that Dave is wearing a skirt and some boots and a jumper a bit like I'm wearing today. Um. Now if Dave goes into the female bathroom the women in there might say that Dave is a risk to her.

If Dave goes into the male bathroom statistics definitely show that Dave is at much more risk to herself by going into the male bathroom wearing a skirt and boots and longer hair than if Dave was to go into the female bathroom.

Um there's no evidence at all that Dave is a risk just because Dave is trans, uh, to other women in that bathroom But if Dave goes into the male bathroom wearing a skirt and high heels boots and and long hair he, she, is definitely at risk in that bathroom. So it's like - oh, gosh, we must protect the cisgender women from Dave who happens to be transgender in the in the female bathrooms. We must make her go into the male bathrooms where she will be at risk of abuse, whether that's physical, or verbal, or emotional abuse.

And the statistics do show us that. Um, and it's like, okay, so whose life is more important the cisgender women who might feel a bit offended? And then, like, do you know what if you feel offended in the bathroom because Dave's in there get out.

You know just let Dave do, do their wee,and then, and then you can go in afterwards. You know, we have a really, we got a problem here?

But I don't think we should say: "Sorry Dave you've got to go in there." And I know you're going to be at risk in there of being peed on, shouted out, pooed on.

'You know what I mean, honestly that's what we've seen. Um, so come on ladies. Uh, we are about inclusion. We are about equality. Diversity matters. Diversity is beautiful. Um, come on, shut up. Let, let Dave go to the toilet for goodness sake.'

(edited Youtube transcript, there may be a few errors, I watched it on 1.5 speed and skipped bits, so may have missed some)

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFsP0H8194A

Smurhee · 15/04/2025 11:32

Why doesn’t she say come on, chaps, don’t pee or poo on Dave?

ArabellaScott · 15/04/2025 11:34

I'm still wondering where she got the stats on men ... pooing on other men in toilets.

Because she claims she definitely has them.

ArabellaScott · 15/04/2025 11:34

Smurhee · 15/04/2025 11:32

Why doesn’t she say come on, chaps, don’t pee or poo on Dave?

But yes.

It's quite stark. Webberley wouldn't dream of admonishing men.

Datun · 15/04/2025 11:48

ArabellaScott · 09/04/2025 09:49

That really is a wonderful little speech.

'I think it it is difficult to get your head around it, um, and you know how can somebody who was born a male actually be a female?'

(Obviously, they can't.)

'But if we just put that aside,'

(If we just disregard the truth)

'it's true, it is true that people thought you were a boy when you were born, but actually it's, it's a girl.'

(Accept the impossible. This is the basis of faith.)

'And if we can just go back to that basic premise each time we're confused about it,'

(Stop thinking. Stop trying to make sense. Stop asking questions. If you don't accept my faith you are 'confused'.)

'and understand that transgender people exist and they're beautiful then this world will be a better place''

It reveals entirely a faith based premise. 'If everyone will only believe that men are women when I say they are, everything will be wonderful.'

It's not often you see people spell it out this clearly.

I am delighted Helen has accepted the mission to spread the gospel of trans. I hope her words are going to be shared widely to a huge audience.

Blimey. I was going to say that far from insane, Webberly is entirely rational, desperately trying to perpetuate her incredibly lucrative grift.

But having read that, I think she's bloody bonkers.

The two are not, of course, in any way mutually exclusive.

StanfreyPock · 15/04/2025 12:02

Heard her on the BBC podcast about the Tavistock, episode 7 covering gender GP. Total saviour complex, she sounded absolutely intoxicated by the power rush of giving people what they were being denied elsewhere.

Datun · 15/04/2025 12:26

StanfreyPock · 15/04/2025 12:02

Heard her on the BBC podcast about the Tavistock, episode 7 covering gender GP. Total saviour complex, she sounded absolutely intoxicated by the power rush of giving people what they were being denied elsewhere.

Yes, it's a little hard to mimic zealotry, if you don't really feel it, regardless of how rich it's making you.

I suspect the feedback she gets from men desiring her services has gone to her head and addled her brain

BabaYagasHouse · 15/04/2025 12:43

StanfreyPock · 15/04/2025 12:02

Heard her on the BBC podcast about the Tavistock, episode 7 covering gender GP. Total saviour complex, she sounded absolutely intoxicated by the power rush of giving people what they were being denied elsewhere.

Yes. I listened to that episode too, and that is exactly the impression I got.

This quote came to mind:

“There’s nothing more dangerous
than someone who wants to make the world a better place.”
(Banksy)

ArabellaScott · 15/04/2025 16:36

Datun · 15/04/2025 11:48

Blimey. I was going to say that far from insane, Webberly is entirely rational, desperately trying to perpetuate her incredibly lucrative grift.

But having read that, I think she's bloody bonkers.

The two are not, of course, in any way mutually exclusive.

Edited

Her thinking seems very disordered, and sometimes absurdly simplistic, with gaping holes in logic and critical thinking ability.

Yes, there also seems to be saviour complex - that interview from the God Cast has lots of talk about how Good and Kind and Righteous she is, saving the rejected and outcast, bringing them back into the fold, bravely martyring herself for the cause, etc.

I'm sure the fact she's earning a lot of money from all that saviouring doesn't hurt, either.

lcakethereforeIam · 16/04/2025 14:17

Pertinent, and sad, article in the Telegraph

https://archive.ph/1mxfl

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/16/12-year-old-changed-gender-puberty-blockers-cass-report/

The initial case he recounts, what monsters put a 12 yo girl on testosterone!? That poor child 😢

ArabellaScott · 16/04/2025 15:32

HW on the Supreme court.

'When our courts uphold discrimination, we must rise louder.'

https://x.com/HelenWebberley/status/1912465330099687699

Sensitive content
Helen Webberly Gender GP: RED FLAG
Datun · 16/04/2025 16:03

Good lord.

Whatevs, luv

sunbum · 16/04/2025 16:06

you can smell.the stench of desperation and profits disappearing.

Swipe left for the next trending thread