Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Lesbian mistaken for trans woman in woman's bathroom in Arizona

1000 replies

Christinapple · 05/03/2025 10:53

https://www.advocate.com/news/lesbian-mistaken-transgender-arizona-walmart

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/masculine-looking-cis-woman-confronted-by-cops-in-walmart-restroom-kalaya-morton-demands-justice-video/ar-AA1AdWpn

But I thought people "can always tell"?

It also led to the irony the only males in the bathroom were two male police officers who were notified by a store employee who mistakenly thought a male had entered the woman's toilets.

"In an alarming incident at a Tucson, Arizona Walmart, 19-year-old Kalaya Morton*, a Black cisgender lesbian, was confronted by two male sheriff’s deputies while using the women’s restroom, sparking outrage and a demand for accountability.
Morton, who identifies as masculine-presenting or a “stud,” recounted the humiliating encounter that occurred when a store employee erroneously assumed she was a transgender woman. The saga began innocuously enough: Morton had entered the restroom with her ex-girlfriend, who was kindly handing her a tampon— an act of friendship that, unfortunately, soon spiraled into something far more troubling. In an exclusive interview with The Advocate, Morton detailed her shock when the two deputies barged in, shining flashlights into the restroom stall.

“You have to get out of here. You have to come out. We need to talk to you.” Imagine trying to pee in peace, only to have the police storm in like it’s an episode of Cops: Restroom Edition.
“I’m still using the restroom. I’m sitting down, I’m peeing. What is the issue?,” Morton incredulously told the deputies as she sat there.
Now, while most people hope for a streamlined bathroom experience, Morton was treated more like a suspect than a bathroom user. The deputies apparently needed to crack the case of “Who Looks Like a Man in the Ladies’ Room,” a particularly absurd mystery, if you ask us."

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 05/03/2025 22:19

Greyskybluesky · 05/03/2025 20:35

It's really not about being "hyper focused", whatever that's meant to mean.
It's about knowing that there are two sexes, and one of them doesn't belong in women's toilets.

This

FrippEnos · 05/03/2025 22:20

Christinapple

Late to the party but
A masculine presenting lesbian (sorry CIS-lesbian) gets pulled up for presenting as masculine.

Surely this is a win?

She looks like she wants to and does it so well that she she has been picked up for it.

AnSolas · 05/03/2025 22:26

LucyMonth · 05/03/2025 21:32

& how is every pub, cafe, public building going to start sex checking every patron before they use the bathroom?

By sex check do you mean checking for a penis or lack of one?

How about the adults in the building all agree that if they have their own penis or during any prior period had their own penis that they go to the bathroom for males?

If they are unsure they can ask their family or even their GP to check if they had their own penis?

Most women will have worked out what body parts are what but they too can ask family or their GP.

Then there is no need for any confusion as to which bathroom is to be used.

WillIEverBeOk · 05/03/2025 22:26

LucyMonth · 05/03/2025 21:14

I have offered a solution firther up the thread that you must have missed. There have been studies done on this.

Individual genderless bathrooms not gendered toilet block are safest for everyone. In a public space people should walk directly from that space into a cubicle eg directly from the main area of the train station into the cubicle and not into a block where they share the space with other people out of sight from the main area.

Toilet blocks are often up or down stairs, hidden around corners out of the way etc. Individual cubicles accessible in plain sight keeps everybody safe. It’s an extreme example but if you imagine a man trying to assault a woman in a porta potty at a festival…much much harder (nearly impossible) than in a toilet blocks. It’s too visible. It’s too easy to be heard.

In order to really truly keep trans women out of women’s toilet blocks the only way to do that would be to require everyone to carry ID with their biological sex on it and to have to show it to someone or scan it whenever you use a gendered toilet block of any sorts. Or genital inspections. Both seem kind of insane.

People love to say they can “always spot a transgendered person”. No they can’t. So simply banning trans people from toilets doesn’t work. You’d have to enforce it. I think doing away with toilet blocks as a concept makes much more sense and is much less invasive and dystopian.

We can’t have toilet monitors in every supermarket, train station, airport, shopping centre, restaurant etc to make sure no trans people are slipping in where aren’t supposed to. & relying on the public to report it isn’t practical. They get it wrong, not everyone is confident with confrontation and it’s kind of putting the cart on after the horse has bolted.

Edited

On the contrary. Studies show that individual genderless toilets are the MOST DANGEROUS for women. This has been well and truly comprehensively proven.

NImumconfused · 05/03/2025 22:27

LucyMonth · 05/03/2025 21:55

So there are currently 151 transgendered people convicted of sex related crimes in the UK? OK.

There are currently 14,400+ people in prison for sexual offences. So 0.01% of sex crimes are committed by trans people.

Maths is not my strongest point, but isn't 150:14400 around 1%, not 0.01%?

So if transwomen are 0.1% of the population, their sexual offending rate is ten times the male average??

Helleofabore · 05/03/2025 22:29

LucyMonth · 05/03/2025 22:01

It is an ineffective preventative measure. This has already been discussed. Locking your door is a sensible preventative measure against burglary. Putting a gnome on your doorstep is not.

Men are currently coming into women’s spaces and attacking women. Banning trans women from these spaces doesn’t stop them men coming in and attacking women because most of them are not trans women. Yes men ARE banned from women's bathrooms, and yet they are still attacking women in women's bathrooms with much higher frequency than trans women even though trans women aren’t banned from our bathrooms. So clearly banning doesn’t work.

I don’t claim to have all the solutions. It’s like women worrying about being dragged into a bush by a stranger and raped while walking their dogs, but we are much more likely to be raped by our partners/exes/friends/male family members/male colleagues. The issue is complex and therefore the solutions have to be much more complex than banning trans women. Sure, ban trans women! But then what? I’m not in government. It isn’t up to me to come up with all the solutions. But let’s not let them off the hook by simply banning trans women from bathrooms and then saying “ok you’re safe now, will you shut up?” because we will not be safer.

Edited

Except that at the moment, the typical responses female people
had available to us have been removed. Those responses were to walk out, to warn all other female people in the toilet there is a male there, to leave and tell other female people to not go in and to go and seek help. And so on.

Those responses have been signposted as being hate and being worthy of condemnation, so female people have now been conditioned to not react in the ways that allowed us to make the spaces safer. That recent ‘education and conditioning ‘ needs to be gotten rid of.

The solution is not to reduce the usability of the toilet spaces. It is simply to publicise heavily that no male people should be in those spaces, and that all male people should be welcoming to other male people in their male single sex toilets. And to leave the arrangement of female toilet cubicles and the public spaces in that toilet area should be left as is too.

borntobequiet · 05/03/2025 22:33

LucyMonth · 05/03/2025 21:55

So there are currently 151 transgendered people convicted of sex related crimes in the UK? OK.

There are currently 14,400+ people in prison for sexual offences. So 0.01% of sex crimes are committed by trans people.

Tell us you don’t understand statistics without etc.

AnSolas · 05/03/2025 22:33

LucyMonth · 05/03/2025 21:55

So there are currently 151 transgendered people convicted of sex related crimes in the UK? OK.

There are currently 14,400+ people in prison for sexual offences. So 0.01% of sex crimes are committed by trans people.

Did you just go with men are people too?

Your missing the word women

The penis attached to the human places them in the male sex class.

eatfigs · 05/03/2025 22:36

People love to say they can “always spot a transgendered person”. No they can’t. So simply banning trans people from toilets doesn’t work. You’d have to enforce it.

Says a lot about this type of man that he can't accept women saying "no", and rather than voluntarily refraining from entering out of respect for women and girls, will barge his way into women's spaces anyway.

Even more reason to punish this behaviour.

WillIEverBeOk · 05/03/2025 22:37

Stefanodad · 05/03/2025 21:44

The position of not letting trans women into toilets feels very unkind to me.

Whether or not you believe in the idea of transition. The notion that women can’t accept a minuscule risk so that trans women presenting as such can avoid a relatively much more probable one seems hard-nosed to the point of mean to me.

There is ZERO evidence transwomen are at any risk. Indeed and in fact, transwomen and gay men have often said the worst transwomen get is a smirk. There is ZERO evidence of any attacks on a transwoman in the males, and believe me, they'd rub it in our faces and never let us forget it if it did.

However there is evidence transwomen have sexually attacked women in the females. The risk with transwomen in the females is greater than any (non-existent) risk a transwoman faces in the males.

Also, even if transwomen were at risk in the males, why is that OUR problem to solve? Why the fuck do you think women should be HUMAN SHIELDS for male on male violence? Let the males sort it out, it is NOT...OUR....RESPONSIBILITY.

Females have a right not just to safety, but privacy and dignity away from the male gaze, @Stefanodad . It is hard-nosed and disrespectful to say the fox may be attacked by the other foxes, so put him in the hen house. We have a RIGHT to our privacy and dignity, and male on male violence is NOT OUR FUCKING PROBLEM TO SOLVE!

JeremiahBullfrog · 05/03/2025 22:37

I like the privacy of fully self-contained cubicles (with sinks). But to insist on these everywhere would mean a great reduction in the number of toilets available in many places where space is already more limited than is ideal.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 05/03/2025 22:38

Anybody have a good reason why tampon sharing between ex partners (whether or not the person with the tampon ready to hand over would describe themselves as cisgender or not) is apparently now a gesture of female friendship? I'd rather buy another round. Or find somebody who isn't someone I used to shag to hang around with.

Helleofabore · 05/03/2025 22:39

There is a very handy chart around but I am not able to locate it. Maybe someone can post it.

Using the census data and the stats I posted, I believe that the ratio of male sex offenders who is identify as female is much higher than the found in the general UK population. It was something like 1 in 585 male people with transgender identities using the census data.

The rate is nowhere near that high for the general male UK population.

However, all need to say is that that group of male people do not have a rate of committing sex offences lower than the general UK male population. And it doesn’t even approach the female sex offending pattern. Therefore they should never have been allowed in the female single sex spaces and should be treated, for safeguarding needs of female people and children, as their sex. Ie. male and never female.

WillIEverBeOk · 05/03/2025 22:39

LucyMonth · 05/03/2025 21:45

No I’m not very young. Not by a long shot.

You are misunderstanding my question. We can ban men from women’s toilets. Including trans women (men). But how do we actually check that a trans women (man) isn’t entering a women’s toilet? By what “social contact”? If you look female enough cool, if you don’t you have to prove you are female first? How? That’s what I’m getting at.

Also banning men from women’s toilets hasn’t worked thus far. We always have been and continue to be attacked in our spaces by men who appear as men. Banning men who are trying to appear as women doesn’t stop us being attacked.

There is no “returning to what we once knew”. I was attacked by men twice in public toilets over 20 years ago. Trans people were not constantly in the media then. They aren’t campaigning to be allowed to use our bathrooms. Trans people have not caused us to be unsafe in our spaces. We always were unsafe.

It works by allowing us to call the police if needed. It always worked until the last 10 years ago.

Trans activists did this by campaigning to enter our spaces, then campaigning to have the rules changed to allow them to enter as their gender identity and finally having 'terfs' arrested instead of them arrested.

I am bemused that you think a system that worked so well for decades/a century, until 10 years ago, is now suddenly 'unworkable'.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 05/03/2025 22:44

MakeYourOwnMusicStartYourOwnDance · 05/03/2025 11:03

Never mind a woman getting questioned /doubted/challenged and accused of being a man, oh that's alright then. 🙄
If it hasn't happened to you good for you but you've got no clue.

It has happened to me, several times. I'd rather be challenged again in the loo every day than have one little girl suffer like Lennon Dolatowski's victim did.

Helleofabore · 05/03/2025 22:47

LucyMonth · 05/03/2025 21:55

So there are currently 151 transgendered people convicted of sex related crimes in the UK? OK.

There are currently 14,400+ people in prison for sexual offences. So 0.01% of sex crimes are committed by trans people.

There are currently 151 in prison at that time.

Of course, there are those who are also released from prison who are not included in those statistics. And those who are awaiting trial.

And I think the stat that you need is 14400 : of all the male people in the UK vs the current number of male
transgender people in prison for sex offences : all the male people with transgender identities as stated as female in the census.

NextRinny · 05/03/2025 22:48

Quick! Capitalise on this event! Open the flood gates!

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 05/03/2025 22:48

Christinapple · 05/03/2025 11:06

I wasn't looking for this, it just appeared on my timeline.

@TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown in an interview she described the encounter as "humiliating and distressing". I would imagine it would be more than "slightly inconvenienced" to be peeing and have 2 male cops knock on your door because you didn't look feminine enough for someone's liking.

Is it ok for male cops to enter the women's toilet based on what someone thought? Wouldn't it at least be better to send in female officers?

Is it ok for male cops to enter the women's toilet based on what someone thought? Wouldn't it at least be better to send in female officers?

Let me fix that for you.

"Is it ok for male cops to enter the women's toilet FULL STOP? Wouldn't it at least be better to send in female officers?"

The answer is "no, it's not OK because male police officers are a hazard to women, and yes, they should have sent female officers in, and by 'female' I mean born with vulvas". And that answer holds whether the reason for the call is a percieved male in the loo or any other reason to call the police to a women's loo. The only men who should enter a women's loo whilst it's open for use are paramedics if someone has collapsed.

XXylophonic · 05/03/2025 22:52

LucyMonth · 05/03/2025 21:30

I am just one single woman. I am not an expert. Just because I think we need more robust solutions to keep us safe than “keep men out of our bathrooms” (they are already supposed to be out of our bathrooms, but you and I unfortunately both know they are very much in our bathrooms) that doesn’t mean I have all the answers. I don’t. It is not my job to find a solution. I’m just someone on Mumsnet. I would encourage the people in our government whose job it is to think of solutions to work on this instead of paying lip service with “keep men out of women’s bathrooms”. Ok cool…how? By banning trans women. Ok cool. And the cis gendered men who overwhelming make up our attackers? That keeps them out how? It didn’t 20 years ago when I was attacked and the trans conversation wasn’t even happening. There was no “oh better not say anything they might be trans” back then.

You keep mentioning that banning trans women will not keep women safe. No one is saying it will keep us 100% safe. We will never be completely safe as men will always attack women.
The point is men are already banned from single sex female toilets but transwomen aren't. Transwomen are men too so they need to be banned the same.
It seems like you are saying there's no point in banning transwomen because 'cis' men attack more.
If you acknowledge that 'cis' men should be banned, why do you think transwomen shouldn't be? Because they are such a tiny minority. Anyone can self id these days so I'm sure we will be seeing more and more men identifying as trans for nefarious reasons.
As said earlier, any man can identify as trans now-its not about appearance or 'men in dresses'. If transwomen are allowed in toilets then potentially any man can access which makes us all unsafer.
If women are assaulted by men that have to sneak in, how many more men will attack if they are freely allowed access, can't be challenged and don't even have to hide and sneak in as you say?
I have also been attacked in women's toilets before and I don't want it to be made easier by allowing all men access. People will just get used to seeing men in women's spaces because who knows if they're trans etc... and no one will raise alarms anymore.

WillIEverBeOk · 05/03/2025 22:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Keeptoiletssafe · 05/03/2025 22:59

@LucyMonth you didn’t answer my posts.
This is the one where I explain why your preferred design is not safe. I would like your thoughts on it. It is good to get your viewpoint as it is the same as transactivists.

If there’s any evidence you have to say your preferred design is safer, it will be the first time I have seen it so I would love to take a look.

Remember, you will be in a mixed sex area where everyone is expected to be then you want a private cubicle where no one can hear or see you.

This has implications for women’s and men’s health too. If you feel nauseous or ill you are likely to head to the toilet. If you collapse, you are more likely to survive, or avoid suffering long-term damage, if someone notices and rescues you. After 4 minutes without oxygen your body starts to suffer.

The following links should be clickable:

There are known medical reasons for a disproportionally high frequency of cardiac arrests and strokes while an individual is in the toilet room. There are no UK statistics that list where people collapse. However, it is known there are around 100,000 hospital admissions due to heart attacks in this country, equating to one every five minutes. It is estimated there are 400,000 people in the U.K. with undiagnosed heart failure. There are also around 100,000 strokes in this country, equating to one every five minutes. Around 1% of people in this country have epilepsy and around 80 people are diagnosed with epilepsy each day. There are many other conditions that lead to collapse where you need to be noticed and accessed quickly eg. diabetes and asthma.

Like wearing a car seatbelt, toilet door gaps can make the difference in those critical moments.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 05/03/2025 23:04

Ellie1015 · 05/03/2025 11:46

She wasn't mistaken for a transwoman she was mistaken for a man. No idea why you have used that title for the thread.

So Chris has admitted that transwomen are men? Finally!

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 05/03/2025 23:11

Scout2016 · 05/03/2025 11:51

I will say I think race and sexuality are relevant here - if you are a black lesbian living with a background of institutional police racism and heavy handedness, a lack of social regard for lesbians and a mysognistic culture, then you might well not view the police as just doing their job.

That doesn't mean no one should ever be challenged.

Also, I imagine that a Black butch lesbian probably gets a lot of shit generally for "not womanning properly".

The answer to racism, misogyny, and lesbophobia isn't to strip away even more of women's protections, but to strengthen women's protections and make sure that everyone is 100% informed that those protections apply to Black butch lesbians.

Black women are women. Butch lesbian women are women. Men are not women.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/03/2025 23:14

I’m just someone on Mumsnet. I would encourage the people in our government whose job it is to think of solutions to work on this instead of paying lip service with “keep men out of women’s bathrooms”

I'd like them to come up with solutions to keep all types of men out. Why is it our responsibility to solve it any more than yours? I can't take your posts seriously I'm afraid.

Bunny44 · 05/03/2025 23:16

Redshoeblueshoe · 05/03/2025 10:58

Oh bless you Chris - you must look long and hard for these stories.

Now would you like to post about the number of women and girls attacked in women's toilets, by men.
I'll start - Katie Dalatowski.

Genuinely interested to know about statistics around the number of women attacked by trans women in toilets?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.