LGBT Champion has been struck off for racism

[Gingernaut]

An LGBTQ+ champion who worked as a manager in in a women's mental health unit has been struck off for racist comments

In 2016, Sussex Police offered an apology for sending a letter addressing Jaden Rachel Dios Hole as Mr Hole

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-sussex-36737692

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14281009/Nurse-charge-womens-psychiatric-unit-struck-racially-aggravated-incidents.html

Absolutely. There's no better validation than being in these ultimate womanly roles - and presumably to hell with the women who need to use these services.

I've just done something of a rapid skim, and was interested to learn that Tribunal Tweets attended for which I'm grateful. Although Ms Holes request for privacy was accepted the discussion around it on page 62 is telling in my view.

The thought that they can claim to be more of a victim than the vulnerable women they are supposed to be helping whilst lording it over these same women.

Power and the attention that claiming transphobia brings

Interesting that on page 59 of the tribunal hearing report, it seems that Hole’s legal representative tried to get the panel to recuse itself on the basis that it was biased against Hole.

Good to see that the panel didn’t give in to the usual tactic.

I noted that with a wry smile too Sabrina.

Probably because Hole belongs to the sacred caste....

They were found to have brought the [nursing] profession in to disrepute and given a striking off order.

Question- would this thread still have been posted if the person sacked for racism wasn't an "LGBT champion"?

Sometimes when I see post after post about trans people (or people openly supportive of trans rights) do something bad, here it's about racism, I wonder if the main concern is the fact racism has taken place, or is it just an excuse to say "look, trans people bad"?

No, Chris, because this is the feminism board and we are concerned with 'sex and gender'.

This is a man who has adopted a 'transgender' persona apparently to access vulnerable women. Photographs circulating freely online show that he is a fetishist, and he has sought out a role working with survivors of sexual abuse.

The fact he's also been found to be racist is another worrying aspect of how 'transgender' status is used as a protective device to bypass or break down safeguarding.

The concern is that this is a bad person using 'transgender' status as cover. It gives transgender people a bad name, but it isn't even this particular man who is the real issue. The issue is the NHS promoting and supporting him, apparently excusing his transgressions for a long time, and a homeless charity doing the same.

There will always be predators and abusive and 'bad' people. That's a fact of life.

Genderism has created a situation that offers loopholes and creates a sacred caste that people will not question and will excuse, so those aspects are always going to be exploited by unscrupulous and predatory people.

Many of us were aware of this individual before the racist allegations.

It is particularly cruel to do this to hospitalised women who had mental illnesses. They were presumably times when they were not sure what was real and what wasn’t and would have had to put their trust in others. If I was in a vulnerable mental state and saw a man but everyone around me said he was the woman in charge, it would not help my recovery.

Excellent post Arabella.
Worth remembering the general principle that the vulnerable often attract predators because they're often literally unable to speak out, tell or defend themselves. It's why Savile targeted women and girls in Stoke Mandeville hospital - a hospital specialising in treating those unable to walk or move. He targeted girls at Duncrofts - a school for "emotionally disturbed teenage girls" He know that all of these girls would have found disclosing abuse challenging and in many cases would be seen as "unreliable witnesses".
The fact that this individual has gone on to work with another group of vulnerable people after these revelations suggest that safeguarding isn't a priority for the charity - as it presumably wasn't for the NHS.

Christinapple · Today 16:41

Question- would this thread still have been posted if the person sacked for racism wasn't an "LGBT champion"?

Who knows? But for many women here, they should've been sacked for pretending to be a woman and getting to sleep on the floor of a ward full of vulnerable women.

Who the fuck does that???

Do you mean about T? Because LGB and T are two completely entirely different things.

Question to you (yes I know you never interact or answer questions); if this was a GC person, you would have posted this as a thread, wouldn't you? The fact you haven't condemned this racist, femphobic homophobe says a lot.

Chris never misses an opportunity to scold women. Maybe Chris could put some of that energy into trying to do something about the creepy perverts in the TQ community who make normal trans people who want to just get on with their lives look bad? Or does Chris feel that the perverts who abuse others are not only OK and should be able to carry on, but are also great representatives for the community?

Or does Chris feel that the perverts who abuse others are not only OK and should be able to carry on, but are also great representatives for the community?

It's a head scratcher alright 😁

Indeed. And the fact that someone could read the thread but their first thought isn't 'bloody hell how awful for those women!'

Its 'waah not all trans women! Won't anybody think of the trans women!' tells you exactly how they see and value women (the cunty kind).

They have no problem with extremely vulnerable women being used like this.

It's not pointing out a bad trans person, it's pointing out a bad person - who they refuse to condemn, because they happen to be trans. Special exemption. Sacred caste.

"Question- would this thread still have been posted if the person sacked for racism wasn't an "LGBT champion"?"

I don't think a lesbian who was sacked for racism in this context would be raised on this board, as there would be no objection in the first place for her being the post holder.

Yeah the racism is a bit of a red herring.

It's more 'and on top of all that, it turns out they're racist as well! '

Rather than: 'look, a trans person was racist'

Mr A Hole

A Hole by name
A Hole by nature.

Paris Lees did the same. (Sleaze), as did Anna Lee (anally)

It's sniggering schoolboy stuff

Someone in my wider personal circle left his wife and children to become 'his true self'. During the first year, his social media posts comprised of posts about transition alongside other posts aligned with his posting history. The following year they become single issue posts about his transitioning journey - all highlighting his liberation. Just this week, he posted about 'how sexy' it feels to be 'your authentic self' and a day later, he posted about being excluded 'for no good reason' from a single sex provision. It's so textbook in terms of the tussle between reputation management and being unable to fight the thrill obtained from 'putting it out there'.

This descent is of zero surprise to me. All that is unknown is whether he was in denial to himself about the AGP nature of his experience or whether he was trying to mask it from others. If he was less emotionally regulated, I think hie would definitely have chosen a name that had 'hidden' meaning.

In my work, I often deal with children and young people who understand their distress to be gender related. They are such a far cry from the type of people this thread is about. It's so damaging for them (but beneficial for AGPs) to be lumped together in one category

We're supposed to find it highlarious fun when drag queens do it.