Latest Reduxx article on WPATH

[NotBadConsidering]

I’m not a big supporter of trigger warnings, but please be aware that this article features some incredibly grim descriptions of CSA, torture, and other horrors. I don’t know how Genevieve Gluck stomachs it, but I am incredibly grateful she does so the rest of us can get the facts.

I would be particularly interested in the latest visitors who support people with trans identities to explain* what make Eunuch a gender identity and why we should trust WPATH’s SOC to treat children when its formulation is inextricably linked with paedophiles.

https://reduxx.info/exclusive-leading-transgender-health-authority-cited-forum-co-founded-by-convicted-pedophile-in-standards-of-care/

*they won’t, they never do, they avoid threads like this like the plague.

Thanks for sharing @NotBadConsidering. Those men are absolutely vile. I agree, Gluck does an amazing job. And yes, our resident TRAs are going to ignore this, just as they never question who might benefit from puberty blocked children who physically and mentally look and behave younger than they are.

Grim. With a rather telling final paragraph.

Dr. Felix Spector, now deceased, had advertised his services on his website, where he stated that he specialized in “the treatment of the transgendered and those with overactive sex drive,” and boasted of decades of experience working with “the transgendered and those in need of libido control.”

Absolutely vile
Disgusting
The TRAs silence is deafening

Oh god, I really wish I hadn't read that article. I honestly didn't think WPATH could get any worse after I saw that video of a bloke saying they were working towards genital sculpture, but here we are runs off to vomit.

This stuff is so horrific that if you tried to explain it to someone new to all this, they would think it is made up.

But then we know that a paedophile-adjacent man was one of the trustees at Mermaids. We know that child rapist David Challenor manipulated one of his kids into becoming a leader in the Green party so he could access lists of cared-for children.

These men go to great lengths to insert themselves into places where they can access vulnerable victims.

Has anyone kept a running total of how many dodgy men are connected to WPATH?

Ah. I've seen this man before, and wondered:

'Dr. James ‘Jame’ Agapoff said, in , that he was an adolescent, aged “less than fifteen,” when he began participating in the Eunuch Archive forum. Through the website, Agapoff initiated an email correspondence with Dr. Felix Spector, who wrote him a prescription for Medroxyprogesterone, and stated that he believed Agapoff would be a “good candidate” for a castration procedure in the future.'

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363745996_Why_society_should_embrace_the_apparent_rise_in_transgender_youth

Author of 'Why society should embrace the apparent “rise” in transgender youth
September 2022'

And this paper, co authored with two familiar names, Wassersug and Johnson:

'Exposures to information about castration and emotional trauma before puberty are associated with men’s risk of seeking genital ablation as adults'

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370012731_Exposures_to_information_about_castration_and_emotional_trauma_before_puberty_are_associated_with_men%27s_risk_of_seeking_genital_ablation_as_adults

This stuff is so horrific that if you tried to explain it to someone new to all this, they would think it is made up.

the would. And they absolutely wouldn't believe that the NHS had signposted to this bloody organisation.

Most people would think that Wpath couldn't possibly still be running, was cited, had status.

That we must be wrong

Yep. We are the ones having a moral panic, clutching our pearls.

They are the ones bravely advocating for Eunuch gender to be affirmed.

Your regular reminder that Nottingham NHS gender centre is run by two high ups in WPATH. And still signposts to the SoC 8, with the links to the Eunuch Archive.

https://ncth.nhs.uk/other-gp-guidance

That's on an NHS website, linking to the SoC 8.

Has anyone kept a running total of how many dodgy men are connected to WPATH?

I expect Genevieve Gluck has a spreadsheet.

Genevieve Gluck and her team are performing an important function for society and working hard to signpost the need for proper safeguarding in so many organisations. I don’t know how they stomach it.

And yet we get posters coming onto FWR who slag her off as running a stalking and hate site. I don’t understand where people like that are coming from, the horrifying evidence is there in plain sight, showing what these men are doing to society, and to women and children, and yet these posters ignore it.

It’s also horrifying and frustrating that Reduxx lays out all the evidence and still organisations like the NHS don’t act on it. Reduxx have even been quoted in some legacy media reporting and still nothing happens to prevent these men from hurting people. So many people in our society are failing in their duty of care and nobody in government seems inclined to do anything about it.

And when this does all finally reach critical mass and society finally faces up to it there will be idiots asking, “Where were all the feminists on this issue?” which is enraging because “the feminists” were pointing and shouting their loudest to try and warn society but were ignored.

I don’t understand where people like that are coming from, the horrifying evidence is there in plain sight,

One could hazard a guess.

I read this yesterday and I can safely say I found it horrific. I can, however, guarantee that the BEEB, Channel 4 or Sky news wont mention a single thing about it.

There’s a missing link somewhere in WPATH.

Who allowed this chapter to be included?

Who vetted it? If they did, why did they allow it in? Did they find nothing? Did they find this and cover it up?

Or do they know what is behind all this and still allowed it into SOC8?

Someone in WPATH knew about all this, is my suspicion.

The chapter went through all the vetting and editing processes. I've watched a flipping PowerPoint on their methodology.

https://wpath.org/publications/soc8/methodology/

Either their vetting process is woefully inadequate or they found the paedophile links and allowed it anyway.

What is absolutely undeniable is that since the multiple revelations of paedophile links they have said absolutely nothing and made no moves to remove that chapter.

https://notindenial.substack.com/p/on-wpath-and-the-eunuch-archives

@UtopiaPlanitia And when this does all finally reach critical mass and society finally faces up to it there will be idiots asking, “Where were all the feminists on this issue?” which is enraging because “the feminists” were pointing and shouting their loudest to try and warn society but were ignored.

That's because human ears can't hear our high-pitched shrill bat-squeak-like little lady voices.

I think the ‘don’t kinkshame’ concept has really permeated academia to the point where some academics can’t see criminality and depravity when it’s right in front of them. They seem to view moral reactions to immoral behaviour as a sign of plebianism and therefore to be avoided by ‘enlightened sophisticates’ such as themselves.

Academics are certainly not separate from immoral behaviour.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/aug/11/manchester-university-phd-masturbating-to-comics-of-young-boys

Tangent - update on that. Andersson is still doing his 'research' and has published a book.

I am generally quite dim, and slow to take in what everyone else twigs quite quickly, but is that person actually writing his PhD on his OWN paedophilia??? And the university ethics committee saw nothing wrong with this?

Yes. Masturbating to Japanese comics depicting drawings of children.

He has, I believe, been expelled, but it seems to have taken quite a long time.