Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Republicans introduce bill to define ‘male’ and ‘female’ based on biological differences (US)

101 replies

IwantToRetire · 03/12/2024 02:05

Several Republican lawmakers introduced legislation to clarify that the terms “male,” “female,” and “sex,” among others, refer to the biological distinctions between men and women when those words are used in laws.

The Defining Male and Female Act of 2024, introduced by Sen. Roger Marshall from Kansas, aims to prevent government officials and courts from reinterpreting those terms through the lens of gender ideology by identifying men and women based on self-identification instead of biological distinctions.

Marshall said in a statement that he “didn’t think we would need legislation to tell us that there are only two sexes, male and female, but here we are.”

According to a news release, the legislation would restore the legal right to reserve girls’ and women’s sports and scholarships for biological girls and women. The news release also states that the bill would restore the sex separation of restrooms, locker rooms, dorm rooms, prisons, and shelters for victims of sexual assault.

“As a physician who has delivered over 5,000 babies, I can confidently say that politicizing children’s gender to use them as pawns in their radical woke agenda is not only wrong, it is extremely dangerous,” Marshall said. “We must codify the legal definition of sex to be based on science rather than feelings. With our legislation, we can fight back against the Biden-Harris administration’s assault on our children.”
Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, said in a statement that “men and women have biological differences that must be recognized.” He added that “women and girls deserve to feel safe and respected in all spaces, public and private.”

The legislation is designed to unwind policies that were enacted during the administration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

Under the current administration, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reinterpreted the Affordable Care Act’s prohibition on “sex” discrimination to include any discrimination on the basis of so-called “gender identity.” The rule was blocked by a judge but would have forced health care providers and insurers to cover transgender drugs and surgeries for both adults and minors.

The administration also revised Title IX regulations to redefine sex discrimination to include any discrimination based on gender identity. This could have forced publicly funded schools and colleges to allow biological men in women’s locker rooms, dormitories, and athletic competitions. However, its enforcement is limited after multiple courts blocked implementation.

Article continues at https://ewtn.co.uk/article-republicans-introduce-bill-to-define-male-and-female-based-on-biological-differences/

I suspect this will be treated with suspicion by some because it seems to have the backing of churches.

And that it was introduced by a Republican - press release Defining Male and Female Act of 2024,

Republicans introduce bill to define ‘male’ and ‘female’ based on biological differences – EWTN Global Catholic Television Network

https://ewtn.co.uk/article-republicans-introduce-bill-to-define-male-and-female-based-on-biological-differences

OP posts:
TempestTost · 07/12/2024 13:05

Lovelyview · 07/12/2024 09:07

Welcome to the board. Although you're being teased for your accent you will find many on here were taken aback to be agreeing with Republican supporters on something. For a lot of us there was one thing which 'peaked' us. For me it was realising that the authorities genuinely were putting men who identified as women in women's prisons - combined with the information that men's rate of sexual and violent offending remained the same even if they 'identified' as a woman. I'm not a stupid person but I was always inclined to trust that those in authority know what they're doing. Such a clear example of the fact that they don't know what they're doing, and that women were being put in danger because of it, finally awoke my sleeping feminist and here I am.

This is what happened to my mum. She didn't initially believe me when I told her they were putting women in men's prisons in Canada. She thought that probably a "feminist website"must be getting it wrong. Because obviously no one elected would do that, and especially it wouldn't happen under the auspices of the leader she had tried hard to get elected.

Anyway, I showed her it was true and then there were the protests by the women prisoners that weren't really covered by theCBC, and she found out about what the Elizabeth Fry society (for which a family friend worked as a lawyer) had done and her mind was blown.

It was actually the beginning of a complete unraveling and realignment of her political values.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread