For Women Scotland in Supreme court - thread 2

[ArabellaScott]

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5182666-for-women-scotland-heading-for-supreme-court

And it's "after lunch"

Just restarting now

Staples and homework!

No chocolate here, a tragic tale.

Yes indeed!
You can't confer a fundamental human right to do or have something which is impossible. Like unaided flight, or changing sex.

If 9(1) is a deeming provision, it doesn't matter that sex and gender are used interchangeably. Gender may have been just another word for sex at that time. Plus the Goodwin judgement talks about gender identity, if that is what was meant, the lawmakers could have used that in the GRA or the GR bits of the EA.

IANAL, of course.

Actual photo of Boiled with the first chocolate bar

Not going to answer the question "living as a woman" - not relevant <sigh>

If I post 'Paperclips, Ma'am!' am I being pointlessly obscure? Can't resist it. 😏

'Trans men' mentioned almost as an aside, there.

Ain't that the truth.

EHRC guidance, but what is it...??

Is she waffling the best of waffles through her answers!

What it means to live as a woman not really relevant (!), but here's the list of the paperwork the GRC panel needs.

🙃<--- living as an Australian.

Makes about as much sense

She can't answer the living as a woman can she

Nope. She's got nowt.

Was that 'no adoption example'?

She might as well say, the dog ate my homework!😂

She's not had a happy relaxing lunch has she...

Tells woman to her left to " Shut up; evidence from Pink News is not applicable"

Can't see the judges being impressed with the standard to which she did her homework. Very the dog ate it.

@NoBinturongsHereMate are you thinking of the Mischief Rule? The Law in Haydon's case 1584?

No legislated specifics on contents of 'Declaration' for GRC.

Christ.

Boiled's second chocolate

Quite possibly - will look up later. Thanks.