Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Women's jail campaigners demand transmen offenders should be kept in female prisons *Title edited at OP's request*

241 replies

IwantToRetire · 27/09/2024 01:29

Women's jail campaigners are demanding that the growing number of trans male offenders should be kept in female jails.

Dr Kate Coleman, of Keep Prisons Single Sex, said that the instances of women identifying as men mid-sentence is a “growing problem”.

But she believes that such prisoners should be treated as women - and that moving them to men’s prisons or a special “trans unit” would be misguided and dangerous.

“Whilst the focus, rightly in my view, has been on the risks that males who identify as transgender pose to women in prison, the challenges of adequately and appropriately meeting the needs of females who identify as transgender must be addressed.

“These needs must be met within the female estate.

“I understand that females who identify as men are difficult to manage.

“But there is no quandary about where to house her. She is female and belongs in the female estate. She must be managed in a way that is continuous with the way in which all other female prisoners are managed. Housing her in the male estate is not even a question that should be asked.

“This is for her own safety and for her own benefit as it is in the female estate that she will be able to access the services and programmes that are necessary for her to progress.”

NB Only extracts, NOT the whole article which can be read in full at https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/womens-jail-campaigners-demand-trans-33750904

Women's jail campaigners demand trans men should be kept in female prisons

Keep Prisons Single Sex claims there are more and more women self identifying as men in women's jails - but male estate would be a danger to them

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/womens-jail-campaigners-demand-trans-33750904

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
ArabellaScott · 14/10/2025 13:33

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 22:45

A lot of humans don't. Or are you suggesting sex is determined wholly by fertility?

So you cannot explain how humans reproduce. Depressingly, I had expected a non answer, which is a pity, because Id dearly like to hear the explanation from someone who believes in gender ovrr sex.

ArabellaScott · 14/10/2025 13:36

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/10/2025 23:12

Exactly. We’re gender atheists, not gender police. I don’t give “gender” any importance, just sex.

Im happy to go with 'gender agnostic'. Just to be a pain in the arse. 😊

TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown · 14/10/2025 13:40

I like Gender Apostate.

I used to (kinda) believe in Gender Identity (until I gave it some proper thought and realised it was a load of old guff dreamt up by quack sexologists).

DeanElderberry · 14/10/2025 13:46

Cassandrazone · 14/10/2025 00:16

Not really. Just that I do not for a moment believe that the question of who and what a woman is can ever be reduced to some sort of biological algorithm. And that the right to self-define, which feminists have fought for for as long as there have been feminists, is far to valuable to be handed over to some self-appointed clique of experts. Particularly when, as is the case here, those experts carry the unmistakable whiff of far-right Christian authoritarianism.

I've been a feminist for more than half a century. I have never felt any need to 'self define' and I have never heard any other woman talk about needing to 'self define'. The right to have a job, an education, a bank account, yes. The right to control our fertility, yes. The right to political representation, yes. The right to support when we bear and raise children, yes. The right for equal pay for work of equal value, yes. The right not to be molested, yes. The right to make choices in many areas of our lives, yeas. The right to voices and to visibility, yes

But 'the right to self-define' - I don't even know what the words are meant to mean in that context.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 14/10/2025 13:50

ArabellaScott · 14/10/2025 13:36

Im happy to go with 'gender agnostic'. Just to be a pain in the arse. 😊

I think I'm a gender apathete.

I just do not care. Please do not talk to me about your gender identity. It's boring. Talk to me about literally anything else.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 14/10/2025 13:53

Cassandrazone · 14/10/2025 00:16

Not really. Just that I do not for a moment believe that the question of who and what a woman is can ever be reduced to some sort of biological algorithm. And that the right to self-define, which feminists have fought for for as long as there have been feminists, is far to valuable to be handed over to some self-appointed clique of experts. Particularly when, as is the case here, those experts carry the unmistakable whiff of far-right Christian authoritarianism.

What women are being denied is the right to self-define.

I wish to self-define as a female person. A member of the biological sex class which is defined by its childbearing role; a class which excludes all members of the male sex however they believe they identify.

They will not allow me to self-define as that. They will not even allow me to have a word for it.

Well, tough shit. The word for that is "woman", which is why I do not and will not ever accept that a male person can be a woman, no matter how he believes he identifies and no matter what body parts he has had chopped off or otherwise altered.

ArabellaScott · 14/10/2025 14:03

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 14/10/2025 13:50

I think I'm a gender apathete.

I just do not care. Please do not talk to me about your gender identity. It's boring. Talk to me about literally anything else.

Are you sure? Today I've been feeling a bit like I have a new and exceptional gender identity that you've definitely never heard of, and I think it's potentially fascinating. I've made a flag and everything.

ArabellaScott · 14/10/2025 14:04

DeanElderberry · 14/10/2025 13:46

I've been a feminist for more than half a century. I have never felt any need to 'self define' and I have never heard any other woman talk about needing to 'self define'. The right to have a job, an education, a bank account, yes. The right to control our fertility, yes. The right to political representation, yes. The right to support when we bear and raise children, yes. The right for equal pay for work of equal value, yes. The right not to be molested, yes. The right to make choices in many areas of our lives, yeas. The right to voices and to visibility, yes

But 'the right to self-define' - I don't even know what the words are meant to mean in that context.

I strongly suspect it involves Pilates. I fucking hate Pilates.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 14/10/2025 14:19

ArabellaScott · 14/10/2025 14:03

Are you sure? Today I've been feeling a bit like I have a new and exceptional gender identity that you've definitely never heard of, and I think it's potentially fascinating. I've made a flag and everything.

Absolutely sure. Please do not.

FortheloveofPetethePlumber · 14/10/2025 14:21

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 14/10/2025 13:53

What women are being denied is the right to self-define.

I wish to self-define as a female person. A member of the biological sex class which is defined by its childbearing role; a class which excludes all members of the male sex however they believe they identify.

They will not allow me to self-define as that. They will not even allow me to have a word for it.

Well, tough shit. The word for that is "woman", which is why I do not and will not ever accept that a male person can be a woman, no matter how he believes he identifies and no matter what body parts he has had chopped off or otherwise altered.

Not to mention that its based on you agreeing to have a sex based duty of submission, pretense and enablement to the greater importance and value of a man's wishes.

Based on binary biological sex.

I'm with Arabella. There is no need at any time for Pilates.

DeanElderberry · 14/10/2025 14:33

Not to mention that its based on you agreeing to have a sex based duty of submission, pretense and enablement to the greater importance and value of a man's wishes.

Is that what Pilates is? I never knew.

lcakethereforeIam · 14/10/2025 15:15

So not the bloke who crucified Jesus!?

DeanElderberry · 14/10/2025 15:34

well, those women who hung around with Jesus were kinda uppity

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 16/10/2025 00:30

Cassandrazone · 14/10/2025 02:42

And this is why your ideology is circular. What objective reason is there for regarding external genitalia as a completely insignificant indicator of biological sex, but treating some notional past ability to produce sperm or ova as all-important? There is none, unless the sole point of the argument is to rationalize a belief system already decided upon.

There is only one thing I care about when it comes transsexuals, and that is, are they a threat to women or not? And that is purely a matter of evidence -- proper evidence, published in peer-reviewed journals, not just anecdote or hearsay. Idiotic arguments about chromosomes or the size of gametes are of no relevance to that. Not even when in sports, where the only thing that matters is whether women and transsexuals come from a monomodal or bimodal performance distribution, which can easily be tested using a two sample t test. Only guess what? No one wants to do the science. Presumably because they're all scared stiff the results won't be the ones they want.

Anyone who can sire a child is a risk to anyone who can bear one. That's where the gametes come in: they determine whether a person is at risk of being forced to become pregnant or poses the risk of forcing a pregnancy in someone else.

Gametes are what determine whether the crime we call rape poses a pregnancy risk to someone.

Recognising the risk of pregnancy from rape is not circular, nor is it an ideology. It is a pragmatic acknowledgement of biological reality.

Andprettygood · 16/10/2025 07:49

RedToothBrush · 14/10/2025 08:18

Get a grip.

Sex is a biological binary code, not an algorithm.

Have you swallowed a dictionary and forgotten to learn what the words mean?

This

If the entire feminist movement was determined by dedication to fighting the cause on mumsnet - then @RedToothBrush would have squashed all this nonsense ages ago!

LesbianNana · 16/10/2025 17:58

Kendodd · 27/09/2024 09:20

Can't help thinking that if you house female prisoners in men's prisons, you will have pregnant inmates.

Correct. Housing men in women’s prisons has also led to pregnant inmates.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread