Om surprised by that 'interview' by Tom Kershaw, I thought The Times was a bit more objective than that. It mentions the opposition VP has encountered, but Tom Kershaw lets VP off the hook:
The counterpoint, of course, is that, having gone through male puberty, Petrillo has an inherent advantage over her rivals, regardless of whether she has undergone hormone therapy, and a female-born athlete has lost their own Paralympic dream as a result. And the fact that Spain’s Nagore Folgado Garcia, a World Championship bronze medallist 31 years Petrillo’s junior, missed out on the 200m semi-finals as the fastest loser was amplified by the likes of JK Rowling, who branded Petrillo an “out and proud cheat”. Petrillo responded to that criticism at trackside by saying she has “never read Harry Potter”.
'I've never read Harry Potter' the best response VP can come up with, and Kershaw let him away with it??
“People said [lots of] men would go to compete as women just so they could win, but that has not happened at all. It is just transphobia.”
Any follow-up questions, Mr Kershaw, quoting the many examples of just that happening? Nope.
“better to be a slow, happy woman than a fast, unhappy man”
But you were never that fast as a man, were you VP, and I don't think your fellow athletes would thank you for suggesting that the Para/Olympics exist to make slow women happy.