Anyone saying ‘see there’s no advantage for TW as VP didn’t win’ can get in the bin.
Show me a 51-year-old woman with a mum bod who can get anywhere near VP’s score. A 51-year-old woman going through the menopause competing in elite athetics. Nah, not going to happen.
VP wins, it’s unfair for women.
VP loses, it’s still unfair for women, particularly those he deprived of even taking part in the competition in the first place.
Inclusion of a TW in women’s sport will always mean the exclusion of women, win or lose. It happened with Laurel Hubbard and it’s happening again now.
It’s not unkind or politically incorrect to say males have a physical advantage over females. They do.
Open categories for trans and non-binary people are needed to make this fair for women. Undeniably, these open categories would not be great for trans-identified females due to their biological disadvantage compared to males, but if they don’t take testosterone, there’s no reason why they can’t compete in the women’s category anyway.
This isn’t terfery, it’s merfery. No males in female sport, ever. Trans-masc and non-binary females are welcome if they’re not taking testosterone. Job’s a good un.