Children protesting at DfE

[MyOliveDog]

Shocked to see this thread on X about children protesting at DfE and planning to stay out all night asking for random adults to go and provide “protection”.
https://x.com/mforstater/status/1828912578631725277?s=46&t=0kj2teDK1iyM7jd4u9rCqQXthread

So many questions.

Starting perhaps with who watches the watchers...I hope there's some police in the vicinity.

Where are these children's parents?

Outrageous levels of white MC privilege on display, matched only by the transperbole 🙄

There are homeless children in London who are constantly unsafe. Who know you sleep during the day in busy places & hope for the fecking best. How have they got a whole gang of them there & no watch system of their own? What use is an adult or two going to be? 🙄 Absolute selfishness & potentially they’re diverting resources from people who actually need them - eg technically the Night Stars don’t work that area but what’s the betting someone’s been detailed to babysit?

Why are parents not accompanying them if they wish to sleep on the streets.

I mean Kirsty annoying woman off the telly was reported to social services for allowing her 15 year old to go inter railing.

These kids are asking for random adults their parents don't know to 'look after' them.

There should be a bunch of social service referrals going on here.

I imagine there are only 3 or 4 who stay overnight and they would probably be older kids (18s?). Having said that from the video's they do seem to be predominantly female, although I doubt they identify that way, so possibly vulnerable from random men.

I'm also confused about what their message is and why they are at the DfE as no guidance has been issued yet. No civil servant would throw out all the consultation responses because of some flag waving youths outside the building.

This is their list of demands from the X thread, in case some don’t have accounts…

'People who are unaffected by us' is the sentence before telling everyone they must alter their language and abandon their understanding of sex and take down their boundaries and protections..

I think they should be doing extra classes with a tutor rather than camping on the streets of London talking gibberish.

Love the point about external validation, that’s exactly what this is all about but from their side!

What absolute brats.
Fingers crossed a few nights on the streets might show them what it actually means to ‘feel unsafe’.

"Who we are is not a contested ideology". What?!

"Theoretical disapproval"?!

"Our identities...should not be subject to external validation"?!

"Our reality should be reflected in what we learn about in education "?!

The entire list makes no sense and is inherently contradictory. Like their ideology I guess.

I don't know if anyone's looked at their Instagram page or if this link will work but it sums up for me how these kids are being used. There's a booming man's voice then lots of female voices parroting back to him. So much for breaking down the patriarchy

www.instagram.com/p/C_BUTyEooq9/?img_index=1

Why do they always wear masks?

“Our identities should not be subject to external validation” BUT ALSO “we should be protected from misgendering” ie we require external validation via compelled speech.

Quite.

I will take these idiots seriously when they can come up with a coherent argument for anything.

“Priority: our comfort and safety takes priority over the theoretical disapproval of those unaffected by us.”

So they are up for debate about the comfort and safety of those affected by demands to give male teens access to female teens’ intimate hygiene facilities, are they?

And as their identities “should not be subject to external validation”, they won’t be demanding access to opposite sex facilities to validate their identities then?

“who we are is not a contested ideology”

Correct, a person can’t be a contested ideology. A person can however be a victim of a contested ideology or can identify themselves with a contested ideology.

What's the process to report them to social services?
Susie Green has been down there - why isn't she sleeping rough with them everynight to protect them? David Tennant surely could protect them all and be a human shield with his chicken body.

Aaawwww bless

The usual bilge then.

They are making fools of themselves and people will be laughing at them. They need protecting from themselves.

So they want adults to come and protect them while they sleep on the street, but the adults should leave them alone if they want to take life altering drugs and have irreversible surgeries?

Yep!

Did I see their lack of boundaries has led to one who started climbing walls of the building?

The list of demands strikes me as pure gaslighting.

Not exactly. They want adults to come and protect them while they sleep on the street, and they also want adults to give them life altering drugs and irreversible surgeries.

Basically, they want adults to do what they demand, because they think they know best. They're teenagers. What do you expect?

This blog from one of their supporters names the climber as 'Grin' blog link
Grin was in a guardian article a few weeks ago claiming that her parents paid for puberty blockers and hormones when she was 14, so leaving her to sleep on the streets being watched over by internet randoms seems to be par for the course.Guardian article