What I got from it is that anyone who disagrees with KJK must be doing so because they are just jealous as all they do is fail and all KJK does is win, win, win. (Which is both excessively self-regarding, and reveals a lack of understanding about how political gains are actually made - we need all of it, the populist stuff and the quiet behind-the-scenes stuff. But she may not believe this and may just be stirring the pot, IDK any more.)
I have a lot of admiration for KJK - I remember when she posted as Posie Parker, and she popped up at the "Woman's Place is Speaking Out" meeting in Bristol back in 2018.
Her organising and her open approach has brought a huge number of women into the movement - women who had never thought about women's rights in anything more than a "Yes, we've got them" way, and who probably hadn't thought of themselves as feminists. I've heard her called the "housewives whisperer" and I think that's a slightly sarcastic but actually quite astute description.
I think her "Let Women Speak" events are amazing - they have the energy & flavour of 1970s CR groups (if you know you know) and those events are also symbolic of the huge grass roots groundswell of a resurgent feminism of sorts. But she's not a systematic feminist thinker and sometimes her drive to make a difference becomes about her winning. Easily enough done, to let your rhetoric define you.
But in that rhetoric, I think she sometimes steps over what is acceptable.
However, the history of the last 250 years of feminist thought, theory and activism (and all are necessary) there have been huge rifts, and we survive. We keep going.