GLAAD - I bet she is

[lcakethereforeIam]

Article in the Telegraph

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2024/08/02/lgbt-charity-ceo-glaad-sarah-kate-ellis-spending/

I'll be back in a second with an archive link.

For those of us who can't get a charity to pay for our subscription, this will see you past the paywall

https://archive.ph/6d3y5

Ha! Thanks to this article I now know that GLAAD and GLADD are two separate organisations. Tha latter worry me more, tbh.

I read this last night via the DM who just could help themselves to go all out for a screaming headline!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13700069/LGBT-charity-GLAAD-CEO-Sarah-Kate-Ellis-expenses-revealed.html

What I got from the DM article (not time yet to read the Telegraph, is the sheer dumb stupidity of the celebrities etc., who apparently seem to think a worthwhile charity (not for profit in the US) is one where the CEO is leading a celebrity life stye.

Dont you think that you would wonder whether it is a good idea to give money to an organisation headed by someone who seems to have endless personl expenses.

But then of course, they probably dont care about a cause, just want to be seen in the presence of.

How was this allowed to go for so long.

Hasn't anyone in the community GLAAD is meant to representasked questions.

Just bonkers.

And all that money wasted on one individual.

Reminds me of this