Pleasing news initially, but something is niggling me, maybe someone can clarirfy. I'm quoting the following sentence, which I've just read from the link provided by OP:-
'However, in a 24-page decision, the court concluded that Thomas was “simply not entitled to engage with eligibility to compete in WA competitions” as someone who was no longer a member of US swimming'.
Am I reading correctly, that as Lia isn't a member of US swimming, that is the reason why he lost his legal battle? Because he wasn't entitled to make a challenge, as a non member?