Full Fact: It’s misleading to say 100 studies were not included in the Cass Review

[birchtreeglow]

Full Fact verdict:

"This is misleading. Two systematic reviews considered the evidence of 103 relevant studies to inform the Cass report. Of these, 101 were not graded high-quality, and 43 low-quality studies were excluded from the reviews’ conclusions. All the studies were included for assessment, however."

Stonewall saying that it hadn't intened to mislead anyone on the statement...which they put out in briefings that went straight out via their MPs in Parliament?

Oh aye, when I don't intend to mislead anyone I also put out made up briefings to my list of MPs to be read out to the world too. Doesn't everyone?

It really does feel as if the wheels might be coming loose off the clown bus very, very slowly.

Dawn Buttler showing her ignorance there 😆

'Full Fact approached Mr Bragg and PATHA for comment'. 😂

Good to see Hansard has got a correction of DBB's misinformation embedded in it now:

Dawn Butler
(Brent Central) (Lab)

Share
this specific contribution
All trans children and young people deserve access to high-quality and timely healthcare and support. Around 100 studies have not been included in the Cass report, and we need to know why.[Official Report, 22 April 2024; Vol. 748, c. 663.] (Correction)