“Woman” fails to attend court: child indecent image charges

[NitroNine]

And the Court fell over itself to be sympathetic to said “woman” about “her” failure to appear due to the fact: “I was terrified. I didn’t know how you were going to address me in court. That played with my anxiety.”

The Magistrates have clearly read, marked, & inwardly digested the Equal Treatment Bench Book, because:
Keith Southward, chair of the magistrates’ panel, told Davies: “You will be addressed as you wish to be addressed, so don’t worry about it.”

And of course it’s just grand for their bail conditions to let them keep their job at ASDA. Because we mustn’t inconvenience paedophiles, must we?

Fucking OUTRAGEOUS. 😡

If you're male why not declare a special identity and watch every fecker fall over themselves to pander to your every demand as you weaponise your self-declared fragility.

Once again for those at the back, this is what male supremacy looks like.

Awww those poor sensitive ickle cross dressing paedos can’t possibly have their delicate lady feelz offended can they? Dont worry about the innocent child victims of these vile predators, just ‘be kind’ to the nonces in their badly fitting wigs

Its a fucking disgrace

I just want to SCREAM !!!!! It's like some dystopian nightmare.

But at least he keeps his jobs at Asda eh?

He will be given community service or at the very worse a suspended sentence. Extremely unlikely for first time sex offenders who are found with indecent images to go to jail. Even less likely now that he identifies as a woman.
If he has kids, he will still be able to see them supervised in a contact centre or by a family member.
Disgusting system.

Nonce. Nonce is how he should be addressed. Everywhere.

One mustn't be untoward about paedophiles, innit.

Hope he doesn't work in the children's clothes department.

It really is sickening that men's crimes are still being listed as women's crimes. These guys should have their biological sex stated in every headline, every article eg 'Man who claims he identifies as woman....' It should be clear it is not a woman's crime and when it comes to legal issues they should only be referred to by their biological sex. It's shocking this is still allowed. Why do paedophiles wishes have to be respected?

Ah so he was presenting as a man at the time of his arrest, and the arrest had the magical effect of making him feel like he has a woman's identity.

Is really is amazing how many paedophiles have this happen to them upon arrest.

FFS

Rapid Paedophile Onset Gender Dysphoria?

I think this deserves to be on a main board not just Feminism Sex and Gender.

I have no words 😡

What?..Another man with prison onset gender dysphoria? Must be catching. Is he still identifying as a nonce or did that get washed away in the blue to pink brain transition?

Someone really should do a thesis.

As you say @MagnetCarHair I think it must have been washed away, judging by his comments in the article.

The ETBB needs serious revision, Ipso reporting guidelines need to be overhauled & then an enquiry into how & why organisations that should know better, have swallowed this ideology.

Referring to a name change, the defendant added: “It’s a legal status now and everything.”

Please tell me that doesn't mean they've got a fucking GRC.

“…not to have any unsupervised contact with children under 18, as is unavoidable in the course of everyday life.
This would allow the defendant to continue her job at Asda, the court heard.”

I know that Asda. It’s the only large supermarket in the area. It’s the only place to physically buy cheap kids clothes. It’s got a large children’s clothes area and toys. Just outside the doors there are fixed rides for kids. I cannot understand how he’s been allowed to carry on working at Asda. Surely even if the court said he could (why) he would have broken some contract with Asda and could be suspended with pay until charge.

I wouldn’t particularly like to be a peodophile in Workington though, so there is that.

Is paedophile gender like rapist gender?

He could have changed his name by Deed Poll and that could be what he means by it being legal.

At least he ended up in court with his face in the newspaper.

I’ve left Ito late to edit my post, but wanted to add that his address is about 150 metres from a nursery and primary school. But I guess he’ll now blend right in at the school gates.

Seething reading how the legal establishment are tripping over themselves to protect the welfare of a paedophile. Who the hell is he fooling when he insinuates this crime was committed when he was a different person? Sorry you creep, changing your name and putting on a wig, a dress and high heels does not change who you really are.

If our legal system is not fit for purpose when it comes to Safeguarding children will it come as any surprise when the general public seek out their own justice?

He says "facing who I used to be" as if it was decades ago not last year he was making indecent images of children. Making, not just viewing.

This man still has a fucking job. If Asda don't fire him immediately....

Why the fuck are people falling over themselves to protect the feewings of a fucking nonce?

Honestly it's an absolute disgrace

Which supermarket was it that sacked a worker for comments he'd made on social media? I can't recall now but what that man did was nothing like as bad as this man. Who gets to keep his job.

Asda definitely sacked someone for reposting a Billy Connolly video on their own personal facebook page, it was considered "gross misconduct" because it was deemed to be islamophobic and he was dismissed without notice the same day https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/asda-sacks-worker-for-sharing-17113134