KJK’s insane rant

[Dontblameitonsunshine]

Kjk’s decision to attack everyone who is not her lapdog is increasingly destructive. It looks like Can-sg put on a great conference. Those doctors who have spoken up have risked their careers. Kjk has become famous and has started a business from LWS. She has benefited way more than any of these doctors.

Her work could be powerful if she just stopped attacking everyone else. But these days she is a demagogue and causes more harm than good by capitalising on vulnerable and timid women and telling them that they need her to speak for them.

I've never thought LWS operates remotely like a charity. Rather, like other endeavours, I assume profits go towards funding events and, yes, some for KJK. I'm unsure what the great controversy is supposed to be here since she's never claimed otherwise.

Missed a step Datun. The accusations about other posters followed by the derogation and denigration of the current FWR board.

Yes, and I'm sure you, like me, are perfectly aware of where many of those banned posters are now. Still saying the same, and still supporting women like KJK.

The board itself evolved, along with the rest of the country. It wasn't 'taken over'.

The modern internet is awash with Patreon, Subscribe Star, Buy Me A Coffee, Donate Via PayPal, Superchat, Substack Paid Subscription, Go Fund Me, CrowdJustice options.

Why shouldn’t KJK use them? Pretty much all YouTubers do.

Some objected to her connections with the right. is what I actually wrote. Linked JH as an example. Also linked an article where the media regulator in NZ dismissed claims she'd been misrepresented.

So saying I'm "misrepresenting her" is simply untrue.

This is interesting- because Kiera Bell was affected by KJKs uncompromising position which was influenced by Dittany’s, so although it is frustrating and depressing how people who take a hard line and refuse to compromise are frozen out and monstered, their persuasive messages and the consequences of those messages are long lasting and far reaching.

Guess who also has a donate button. And a legacy button. And a Fundraise button. And a Shop button.

Hope not Hate!

😂

^

I "keep bringing it up" because people insist on misquoting me and asking loads of questions.

There isn't one. It's manufactured in order to attempt a gotcha.

And the problem with moaning about the money she gets, and what it's used for, is it no one cares, because it's collective.

Individually, it's fuck all.

Most women who donate or buy merch will think it's a bloody bargain given what she does for women, and the amplification of that across the world.

Because this is just incorrect:

Well, 90% of all the men that….we’ve arrested for grooming are Pakistani or Muslim or Somali...They’re all Muslims, so let’s talk about Muslim grooming gangs

That's untrue, it's islamophobic and it's exactly the sort of thing far right people say.

Meanwhile you can't even see that it's wrong, and are merrily bolding it and promoting it in your quest to make KJK sem reasonable.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65174096.amp

"If you want to contribute, you get exactly what you pay for."

I hope so. I gave her some cold hard cash and told her to buy herself something to drink when she got to Australia. I really hope she did it.

Yes I'm sceptical of nearly all YouTube. Opinions for clicks should not be a way of making a living. People shouldn't be requesting "donations" just for existing. It's like a black mirror episode.

I noticed. Maybe they need the increased funds to actually do some research so that people who use them as resources and never bother to check because 'journalists', may actually find some journalistic integrity in the information the site presents.

Well just be clear then.

Do you, personally, agree with those people that she associates with the far right?

Or not?

It's my opinion that you keep hiding behind other people statements, so you can attempt a bit of plausible deniability. Which obviously only works in your head.

But now you've got the chance to make your deniability more than plausible, you can make it definite.

Best get campaigning to take the internet away from normies then.

There's a noticable contrast between the laziness of the smears and complete lack of diligence, and the considerable sustained effort to post screeds and screeds and screeds of hand-typed argumentation off the back of such thin gruel.

It's like butter spread over too much toast. Like one of those 5g patties you get in a BnB, spread over a create of Mother's Pride (end-bits included)

And like the other examples upthread - guess what Hope not Hate is?

You guessed right! Its a charity folks. But KJK is nothing like a charity. Only a fool would mistakenly donate her money thinking it was being used for charitable purposes, rather than for her personal income.

I think we should definitely have more rules around the Internet and online harms, and do support that kind of work.

'Just for existing'

Guess who has a you tube channel.

Hope not hate!

Only a fool would mistakenly donate her money thinking it was being used for charitable purposes, rather than for her personal income.

'Fools'

Guess who has had more than one company dissolved and renamed.

Hope not hate!

Great work @Datun, @Helleofabore and others.

And I like your thinly spread toast analogy @BezMills

When people, I can't remember if it was you, complained that she had a nice hotel room in Australia, or New Zealand, and that everyone was a fool for giving her money to get it, did you not notice everyone saying we want her to have it? We don't care if she bathes in champagne?

Do you think women don't mean that?

That's untrue, it's islamophobic and it's exactly the sort of thing far right people say.

That's exactly her point.

all of those things tied in together left a gaping hole for someone to come in and say, “Well, 90% of all the men that….we’ve arrested for grooming are Pakistani or Muslim or Somali...They’re all Muslims, so let’s talk about Muslim grooming gangs”

Selectively quoting and missing out the point that she said the action (or inaction) of the police, the left and the media left a gaping hole for someone to come in and say those things.

You have completely reversed the meaning of what she said. She's not saying those things, she's critical of those saying those things as well as being critical of the police and others who failed to take action.