Not our crimes again

[Lurleene]

Another woman collecting child sex abuse images, fantasising about children and 'exposing her penis'. Although to be fair they were cleared of the last charge.
Samantha Norris

At least the article specifically avoids using the word woman.

"She"

It's so unbelievably enraging. When TRA always say it doesn't hurt to use demanded pronouns, I'm sorry but yes it does. It's so painful to see this person referred to as a "she".

The "she" pronouns are only there because this abusive monster is demanding those pronouns are used - purely to increase their chances of going to a female prison rather than the men's which is where they belong.

They're gaming the system and the system is bending over for them and going along with it.

I do not believe for a second this monster considered "transitioning" until they started committing heinous crime.

Rapid onset prison dysphoria.

But yeah, at least the article doesn't refer to the monster as a woman. They didn't bend over for everything.

Sentencing Norris, Judge Nicholas Rowland said that Norris had also in her possession written notes describing sexual fantasies involving a four-and-a-half-year-old child and a “New Year’s resolution to have sex with a girl under 10”.
He told the defendant: “It’s all about you Samantha Norris and not the victims.
“You do not accept they are victims, you have distorted views and you do not feel your offending should be treated as serious – how would a right-minded person think about that?
“Your views are alarming and complex – you present a high risk of harm to children.
…
Norris, of Ringwood was jailed for two years at Southampton Crown Court on Thursday and was made subject to a sexual harm prevention order for 10 years.

Well, quite.

As ever, I wonder which prison estate will house Norris.

“exposed her penis”

FFS😡 “Pronouns are kind, just respect them!” Fuck off, everyone who ever says this ever. All of you.

Norris, of Ringwood was jailed for two years at Southampton Crown Court on Thursday and was made subject to a sexual harm prevention order for 10 years.

And here we go again…sigh…jailed where?

This newspaper only allows you to view a limited number of articles in full for free so many people will only get to read the first paragraph and if they don't get to read further will be left with the very wrong impression.
A charity shop worker deemed to have "alarming and complex views" was caught with 16,000 images of child abuse and revealed she had a New Year's resolution to have sex with a child under 10 years old.

Now where are all the posters who scream “trans people are never predators!”?

I know that flashing is a difficult crime to secure a conviction for, but seriously I think the two young girls he flashed at have every right to be believed.

Imagine how confused they must feel being told that this man wasn't flashing at them and was, in fact, a woman.

We often say it on here, but it's time the police started taking flashing much more seriously. It's such a clear sign that a man is a predator.

ah but no doubt this one isn't a real one, he is - what was the phrase, oh yes - 'at it' [Joey air quotes]. That's what we shall be told,

As always we ask, how do we tell between those men who are 'at it' and those who are not? [crickets]

I'm waiting for the #RapistHill posters to appear and celebrate the court's and news agencies' use of preferred pronouns and attribution of preferred gender. (SS is from years ago.)

From what I can gather from the Judge’s comments, he pleaded not guilty to the flashing and fiddling with himself to the young girls and guilty to all the other charges (heard later) so the serious flashing behaviour would be trialled without the jury knowing his character. The Judge was scathing of this timeline. How infuriating for the Judge. Mortifying for the jury. But horrifying for the poor girls. Another trauma of not being believed.

Judge’s comments…not guilty to the flashing

According to this and an earlier report from the trial Norris ran the argument that the girls must have been peeking through the flat's windows so what they saw was on them as Norris practices as a naturist at home.

When Ms Norris was arrested and interviewed by police, she said she was a "naturist" and denied the allegations made by the girls, jurors heard.

Edit . Wrong thread

Another day, another trans woman commenting sex crimes.

For a group who we are told only make up 0.5% of people, they are sure on the news a lot for breaking the law. Odd.

Preferred pronouns are harmful. The context of someone's sex makes sense of their crime, men are overwhelmingly much more likely to commit this kind of crime. It also shows the opposite on those extremely rare occasions it's an actual woman - and the rarity and shock of women doing this.

I'm glad the word woman isn't used but she/her is still playing the same game though.

I think the position is that women's crimes are over-reported as a proportion of serious crimes.

These crimes are reported because they're categorised as serious crimes committed by women. And they're substantially skewing the crime statistics because of the proportionally small number of such crimes as committed by women.

There is a mess that is of the media's own contrivance and that substantially affects women and the correct gathering of data.

"Her penis" will always now bring Ricky Gervais to mind! 😄

But of course, it's not fucking funny. Will this sort of thing stop, if people continue to call out the ludicrousness of it? I hope so.