Doritos - why do the very worst keep rising to the top?

[lechiffre55]

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1765136350226112844

Quote
"JUST IN: Doritos fires transgender activist Samantha Hudson just two days after hiring them, claims they were unaware that Hudson likes s*xually assaulting children.

Are these marketing departments run by mor*ns?

Doritos is no longer working with Hudson after tweets surfaced of the transgender saying they would do "depraved things" to a 12-year-old.

Hudson is a proud "Marxist" and calls for the destruction of the "monogamous nuclear family."

"I want to do thuggish things to a 12-year-old girl's [expletive]," Hudson previously said.

"In the middle of the street in Mallorca in panties and screaming that I'm a nymphomaniac in front of a super beautiful 8-year-old girl," another post read.

"I hate women who are victims of sxual assault and go to self help centers to overcome their trauma. Annoying slts.""

I doubt they would have dropped Samantha if it was just violence and sexism. That's par for the course with TRAs, isn't it?

WTF?!

Deleted?

Are we not to mention paedophilia now, Mumsnet?!

Would you prefer me to say that Samantha wrote tweets describing sex acts with children?

Is that more palatable?

"I'm gender critical. I want women to have access same sex spaces where it's appropriate and proportional e.g. changing rooms, toilets, hopitals, where intimate care is needed, sports to name but a few. But where there is no conflict of rights, I want people who self identify as trans to be treated with respect, be equal under the law, live their best lives, be happy."

I agree with this, but I think I'd state it the other way round. That the default is for trans people to be treated as equal under the law to others, but where there is a conflict of rights, I will always assert women's rights to same-sex spaces that are not accessible to anyone male.

Have you had an email @ArabellaScott? I imagine MNHQ are quite busy dealing with Willoughby's fans, so maybe erring on the side of caution a bit too much in deleting everything vaguely defamatory.

It's not defamatory.

It was very clear. The tweets were about sex acts with children.