Doritos - why do the very worst keep rising to the top?

[lechiffre55]

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1765136350226112844

Quote
"JUST IN: Doritos fires transgender activist Samantha Hudson just two days after hiring them, claims they were unaware that Hudson likes s*xually assaulting children.

Are these marketing departments run by mor*ns?

Doritos is no longer working with Hudson after tweets surfaced of the transgender saying they would do "depraved things" to a 12-year-old.

Hudson is a proud "Marxist" and calls for the destruction of the "monogamous nuclear family."

"I want to do thuggish things to a 12-year-old girl's [expletive]," Hudson previously said.

"In the middle of the street in Mallorca in panties and screaming that I'm a nymphomaniac in front of a super beautiful 8-year-old girl," another post read.

"I hate women who are victims of sxual assault and go to self help centers to overcome their trauma. Annoying slts.""

It would be a lot harder not to pick a nut.

Sometimes it's hard not to feel like a monkey in the KP Nut factory.

Any movement which allows people to behave badly without censure or scrutiny will attract the worst people in society. It's not trans people being 'nuts,' it's 'nuts' realising that transactivism is a bottomless get out of jail free card.

Any movement which allows people to behave badly without censure or scrutiny will attract the worst people in society.

Exactly. The cognitive dissonance and failure to acknowledge this in people who consider themselves reasonable and progressive is immense. And less powerful people, like women and LGB people, will suffer more.

That's definitely the worst part.

It makes transpeople look bad.

Raping children is ok, but we don't want to make transpeople look bad . . .

It makes trans people look very bad. There must be many decent trans people out there doing everything they can to avoid being lumped in with this lunacy. They have enough on their plates without having to deal with this too.

Indeed. The genuinely dysphoric individuals who just want to quietly get on with their lives, living in a way that a helps them to come to terms with their bodily discomfort, will be tarred with the same brush as these appalling perverts.

When the backlash comes (and it will) they will be the ones who suffer - the militants and the paraphiliacs will just slink quietly back under their stones and pretend that nothing has happened.

The Telegraph have reported on it

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/03/06/trans-influencer-doritos-violent-comments-children/

https://archive.ph/c8kAx somewhere over the paywall 🎶

Quite!
👏👏

I looked up this person and some commenters on social media appear to be focusing on the fact that Hudson might have been an teenage "edgelord" as they posted the problematic tweets when they were 15 (I didn't have to dig deep to find out they posted all sorts of disturbing things like sucking their dad's dick and their mom's vagina makes them hard), though there seems to be a debate on whether Doritos no longer associating with Hudson can be considered belated punishment because posting such provocative thoughts was 9 years ago.

Hudson apparently issued an apology.

I agree with other commenters wondering why Doritos HR did not do due diligence, and if I were Hudson I would not be surprised that Doritos would immediately sever ties after those tweets were discovered.

I too felt sick reading the OP

One can be critical of Biden's stance on transgender activism and still disagree with people supporting Trump after his attempts to threaten the cores of electoral democracy and having no legacy but policy failures and unnecessary provocation as President (I won't even get into his ongoing lawsuits); since unfortunately Trump is Trump, not some mildly conservative politician whose opinions may differ from yours but still generally tolerable, voting for Biden would not be viewed as equally moronic.

One thing to note when looking at US elections is that a lot of US voters don't seem to fully grasp the current impingement on women's rights by transgender activism, or even if they do, it remains to be seen how many will actually vote based on the issue.

"Why is it so difficult to find non lunatics to represent?", because the whole lot of them are lunatics? No one exhibiting TRA behaviour is of sound mind.

But hey, like many here, despite being an amiable ambling lefty most of my life, I am now well and truly a member of the hard right.

Oh well, if one is to do the time, might as well do the crime. And vote accordingly.

From the article

Hudson said she was sorry for the tweets, which she described as “pure provocation and in very bad taste”.

“Some tweets that I posted in 2015 are resurfacing and honestly I don’t know what to say, I don’t remember having written such barbarities,” she said.

“At that time I dedicated myself to saying nonsense, the heavier the better, because I thought that ‘dark humour’ was funny,” she added.

So that makes these 👇 OK then! Nothing to see here👇

I could accept he had changed- I know some 15yr olds that think this kind of thing is great. The more you tell them it isn’t, the more they dig in and believe their own rebellion is somehow a triumph. I could believe that 15yr old chose the vilest things he could think of to shock.

I would still think a public role is out of the question due to the stupidity of the 15 yr old’s behaviour. Just like if a 15 yr old eats and drinks crap, an athletic career won’t be possible in adulthood. Consequences.

of course accepting the possibility that he was a stupid 15yr old doesn’t mean he isn’t in fact a misogynistic abusive paeodophile.
(Sorry can’t spell it or spell check it for some reason).

The bbc have reported on it, claiming the criticism was lead by right wing activists…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68495705

Interesting.
So right wing activists is the new name for ‘people who understand basic safeguarding’, then?

A journalist also needs to ask him why he plans to make money out of being a proud Marxist, um, brand ambassador.

It's the usual liberal feminist argument of 'people who notice something bad are worse than people who do something bad.'

There are just so many examples of these people being appointed to high profile positions with no experience or credentials other than their identity issues. What about the US government advisor who stole women's suitcases and wore their clothes? Big corporates failing to carry out a basic sweep of social media is one thing but the US Government not doing background checks seems crazy.

biden-official-sam-brintons-2nd-alleged-theft-included-1700-in-jewelry

pickledandpuzzled · Today 08:29

So right wing activists is the new name for ‘people who understand basic safeguarding’, then?

Yes, I'm just sitting here in my SS uniform...

(That's a joke, if clarification is needed).

Whoever the person is s/he has just admitted child sexual abuse via whatever Twitter is called these days.

At first glance I thought that was Shon Faye.

I sometimes think that some people deliberately put themselves 'out there' and blatantly knowing how it will go down to begin with.

Firstly, they love the attention (infamy) - and any attention is coveted, whether good or bad.

Secondly, I wonder if they see themselves as the brave pioneers in breaking down barriers and spearheading radical change, just as soon as society 'catches up with them' and sees that they were on 'the right side of history' all along.

You don't ever get radical change and turn the masses' instinctive, common-sense understanding on its head by quietly putting up your hand and asking nicely for it. The MAPs will have to go brazen, loudly demanding and get right up there in the spotlight if they ever have a hope (please no) of capturing people's sympathy to their vile agenda.

If the BBC is dictating what “left wing” and “right wing “ mean, then yes, apparently.

This person also wants to destroy the nuclear family. Now I know a lot of child sexual abuse goes on within families but can you imagine how vulnerable all children would be to predators with no families to protect them? Whenever someone with paedophilic tendencies argues for the destruction of the family unit you know what their motivation is. Pretty much the same reason these guys want to get into prisons and locker rooms.

Lazy article with the usual cliches trotted out but at least it quotes some of the offensive things that this individual said about causing serious sexual harm to children.