@Christinapple "By making a point of using these words one is basically saying "look everyone, just so you all know I'm a TERF"."
So what words may we use, then, Christina?
We're the class of people who only just got the vote 100 years ago, can't leave the house in Afghanistan, are selectively aborted on a terrifying scale internationally and are 70% more likely to be injured in a car accident here.
We used to have a word to describe ourselves. We used that word to win the vote. We were using it to fight the fights above. We needed it. But now it's been taken from us.
And the objective phrase we resorted to instead, as the only way left to name ourselves? You appear to be inferring above that using it makes threats to violence, if not justifiable, then at least understandable.
So what may we call ourselves?
I ask in all seriousness. Day to day I find myself wanting to use "woman" as it used to be understood, only to remember it's likely to be understood differently. So I brace myself to substitute "adult human female", only to realise it could be taken in bad faith by people like yourself. So I choose between the word that doesn't mean me any more, or the phrase that actually makes me feel unsafe in certain contexts (after all, you say it yourself, above - my using it really can make people that angry).
And it eats away at me as I realise how little I must matter, for society - for our probable next PM, of all things - to have put me in this position.
You've left me without words.
How can you believe this to be defensible?
OP, I'm so sorry. Every time a woman - here at least I know it's still understood - speaks up, she runs this risk. It's a terrifying attempt to silence us. And it's deeply, ethically wrong.
Even this thread, though, will be opening eyes.