jesus, has anyone tried to read this article all the way through?
it's so hard to understand, the headline is 'convicted male peadophile' and the first sections of the article manage to avoid using any pronouns, and refer to him by his last name 'Waller'. The article also talks about his wife, and then halfway through starts to use 'she' for the male peadophile in question. At which point it becomes utterly unclear who 'hid the phone' him or his wife...
discombobulating. It still BLOWS my mind that society is bending over backwards to meet the delusional demands of sex offenders. Bonkers. Why can the daily mail call the male sex offender a HE?