There are a couple of things that bother me about the idea that it is more fair to include transgender people into competitions in the category of the gender as which they wish to live. The first is that although it now seems to be normal for transwomen or transgirls to win in the girls' and women's categories, I haven't seen any instances of transboys or transmen winning in the boys' and men's categories. Is this a difference in publicization of victories by transmen vs transwomen? Or does this reflect that transboys and transmen are unable to compete successfully with boys and men?
Along the same lines, it bothers me that it seems to be that transgirls and transwomen move up in the rankings when they move to compete as the gender as which they wish to live. This would suggest that they gain an advantage by transitioning. If transitioning was truly neutral according to their sports competitiveness and their overall sporting achievement, then I would expect them to retain the same gender-based ranking when they switch the gender in which they compete. For example a cyclist who is ranked 589th among men, when competing as a man, should remain at the 589th rank among women, when competing as a woman, because, if their transition truly does change their sporting ability proportionately, then so should their ranking change proportionately. When someone moves from a 200th ranking to 3rd place ranking, or from 79th place ranking to 1st place ranking, that seems like pretty clear evidence that, even if their performance may decrease a little bit as a result of the hormonal changes of transition, they still retain a competitive advantage due to their underlying sex.
I hope that was clear. I was trying to stay within site rules.