Had it ever occurred to you that I might actually be a woman, in the psychological sense? Or do you automatically rule out that possibility when engaging with trans women?
Ignoring the logical and practical absurdity of trying to use a definition of "woman" relying on something psychological, I could countenance the possibility that one might maybe recognise that transmen or transwomen somehow had opposite-sex-typical behaviour, so maybe one could say there was "something" there.
But as Helen Joyce has said - sexed behavioural differences are just emphasised by "trans". Transwomen tend to be at the far male end of sex-typical behaviour, and transmen tend to be at the far female end. My empirical observation, there is absolutely no trend of trans people exhibiting cross-sex behaviour on anything other than a performative level.
And I liked this, quoted from someone on Twitter by Glinner the other day.
Being "trans" appears to be the condition of especially lacking insight into the experience of the opposite sex compared to the general population
I think there's a lot to that. There are men on this board who manage to blend in enough that they're not obviously clockable as not being women. But that's something transwomen really struggle with, as they have far less understanding and empathy with women.