Sorry to correct you but that's 29 self selecting individuals, who haven't been assessed for any other possible comorbidity that might influence how they feel.
We are left with one glaring problem with Stonewall which everyone should be concerned about for a whole pile of reasons:
Stonewall either don't understand how to do research or statistics and their staff are deeply out of their depth and overpromoted beyond their ability and skillset. Or they are so ideologically driven they deliberately and willfully seek to try to mislead the public with fictitious stats in order to press an agenda without thought or regard as to how it might actually do harm.
The fact they use the word 'dehumanised' says a hell of a lot about them. That's just totally out of touch with reality and hugely disrespectful to people and situations where the word is appropriate.
It is the very height of privilege and abuse of position and power to be doing this.
If they do this with asexuality, what else are they doing it with? (Rhetorical question to anyone who has been following the misrepresentations of Stonewall over the last few years).
In terms of accountability, serious questions need to be raised by people in positions of authority and governance over the quality of the work Stonewall are doing and whether the charity is taking on issues like this for its own self serving agenda or in the public interest.
Stonewall are a neo-religious cult in my honest opinion at this point. And that's why it hates the LGB Alliance so much, because it is the best placed to expose and highlight that Stonewall no longer represents the interests it claims to and instead is looking for grifts to maintain its staff and self importance.