I am, sadly, usually right up in the "men are bastards" camp but I think this report needs a bit more careful analysis. eg, this line, Almost one in twenty (4.8 per cent) of those surveyed said they had had sexual contact with a child when they themselves were aged 18 or older. - they haven't defined what this means but it could realistically be an 18 year old having sex with a 16 year old, which I think most of us would agree is far less likely to be abuse/exploitation.
Also 1500 self selected anonymous respondents doesn't feel great to me, I'd like to see a more detailed view of who responded and how they were found. I feel like there might be an element of self selection - if DH saw an online ad asking for respondents on child exploitation, I don't think he'd be rushing to fill it in as it just wouldn't seem relevant to him.
Don't get me wrong, sexual exploitation of children is clearly a huge issue and I don't want to downplay it, but I don't think this is helpful necessary.
<goes off to see if I can find the underlying report>