Just noticed that the finish of my sentence was cut off, happening a lot with the latest IOS update.
But I am very glad that they are appealing the decision. They are forcing the issue and they are forcing the continuance of the discussion.
Every interview touches on how the sorority forced compliance through threat of effective expulsion. They were told that they should leave the sorority if they didn't uphold the 'values'. So the decision was forced on them. And they have been harmed significantly by this male student's inclusion.
If it is left to every group to be able to decide what their own group's definition of 'woman' is, how can any girl or woman then rely on the law to uphold protections if the decision is forced on them as this was? When it is about permanent accommodation, this is an egregious harm to these young women. It is clearly very different from choosing a gym based on whether the gym has an inclusive policy of allowing males into female single sex spaces.
It will be an interesting case. Brave young women!