Oh my word, nearly 3k comments.
Supportive of the parents, as far as I can see.
Some commentary on abuse, which is pretty clear that it's nothing to do with whether a child is aware of images being sexual or not (my bolding):
'the 2018 HM Government report, ‘Working together to safeguard children’, defines “child sexual abuse” as:“…forcing or enticing a child or young person to take part in sexual activities, not necessarily involving a high level of violence, whether or not the child is aware of what is happening. ... They may also include non-contact activities, such as involving children in looking at, or in the production of, sexual images, watching sexual activities, encouraging children to behave in sexually inappropriate ways, or grooming a child in preparation for abuse [including via the internet]'
'Child sexual exploitation is a form of child sexual abuse. The same 2018 HM Government report, ‘Working together to safeguard children’, defines “child sexual exploitation” as:
“…where an individual or group takes advantage of an imbalance of power to coerce, manipulate or deceive a child or young person under the age of 18 into sexual activity (a) in exchange for something the victim needs or wants, and/or (b) for the financial advantage or increased status of the perpetrator or facilitator. The victim may have been sexually exploited even if the sexual activity appears consensual.'
...
'Non-contact sexual abuse includes where someone made the individual watch or listen to sexual acts or look at sexual images;'