The mindless grabbing of anything that can be broken down for parts and used to push the agenda is a standard feature of this politics. It includes zero respect for the actual events or people involved in the historical event, and weaponises other people's abuse and even murders without the faintest conscience. 'Nazi' for example. There's usually zero actual knowledge at all of the real events, and less interest; the purpose is to use Words That Make Other People Jump When You Say, and it relies on the other person being a nice person who is horrified by those historic events and can be swayed by mention of them.
I wish I had not been forced to become so vilely cynical by this wretched political style.
Women wanting women-only spaces is framed as apartheid against biologically male people of all gender identity choices on the grounds that, I suppose, it is seeing 'another woman' as lesser because - well. They're male. It's pushing the idea that male biology is a form of disability or disadvantage to the women 'trapped' in the wrong body.
This wholly ignores the logic that this requires joining in a religious belief that:
-
the body and soul are somehow different and that you have a religious duty to the soul above the body (see about 2 thousand years of Catholicism for details)
-
women have a duty to sacrifice their privacy, dignity, feelings and perceptions to biologically male people as an offering to redeem themselves because of their born 'privilege' (again see about 2 thousand years of Catholicism, including 'Original sin' and 'the sin of Eve'
-
you are required to enact a belief at all times that the male bodied person identifying as a man is a man, and it is perfectly right and proper for you as a woman to refuse to undress in their vicinity because awful abuse of privacy and dignity BUT the male bodied person identifying as something other than a man is absolutely different (even though in no perceptible way) and it is a sin to with hold your body in demonstration of your faith.
This all, of course, rests on the fundamental belief that the woman must at all times predicate what she sees, hears, thinks, feels and does, entirely upon what the biologically male person in front of her says is going on in their head at the time. And while doing all this, the woman must also pretend that this sex based power imbalance doesn't exist.
What's that bit again about oppression involving required labour?