Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Fuck Oxfam

834 replies

DismantledKing · 05/06/2023 21:55

Anyone seen the tweet by Maya tonight about this little animation by Oxfam? Here’s the link:

https://twitter.com/mforstater/status/1665817901327085568?s=46&t=U7-xooKExwmFQ8mivn72lw

as I said, fuck Oxfam.

Fuck Oxfam
OP posts:
Thread gallery
69
TheBiologyStupid · 06/06/2023 18:27

IwantToRetire · 06/06/2023 18:21

‘I was hounded out of Oxfam over JK Rowling’A former employee reveals how she was silenced
https://unherd.com/2023/06/i-quit-oxfam-over-jk-rowling/

If you copy the unherd link above and go to https://archive.ph and paste the link into the box you will find someone has archived the article.

(Have no idea who all these GC online people are but it is nearly always worth checking archive.ph - or one of the other ones - to see if someone has archived an article)

And if it hasn't already been archived just click on the "Save" button and you'll get access to the article after it has been archived (and so will everyone else).

nilsmousehammer · 06/06/2023 18:28

endofthelinefinally · 06/06/2023 18:20

I have heard exactly this from 3 separate people who either volunteered or worked in admin roles abroad. They apparently spent a huge amount on buying posh cars and big houses for their higher ups.
Unfortunately some charities do attract people who manoeuvre themselves into positions where they can access funds and manipulate board members who are well meaning but naïve. I have seen it happen.

Also quite a lot of chocolate tea pots who would be unemployable in the real world, but get paid a lot to write bids and bring in huge sums using all the pretty buzz words and sit in nice meetings writing nice aspirational documents that use a whole lot of lovely pretty waffle without one discernable action or practical purpose anywhere in sight.

It's a gravy train. Sadly direct personal experience speaking.

Leafstamp · 06/06/2023 18:28

(Have no idea who all these GC online people are but it is nearly always worth checking archive.ph- or one of the other ones - to see if someone has archived an article)

I love that there are armies of GD people keeping receipts and sharing info. Smile

DerekFaker · 06/06/2023 18:31

This is a useful thread from twitter detailing the problems with Oxfam. Can't believe it was 2 years ago, and things have only got worse!

https://twitter.com/JamesBarry1789/status/1403481251693035528?t=wJXbnz0ELJ0Dq5CeVWJxdw&s=19

https://twitter.com/JamesBarry1789/status/1403481251693035528?s=19&t=wJXbnz0ELJ0Dq5CeVWJxdw

littlbrowndog · 06/06/2023 18:35

The emails

Fuck Oxfam
endofthelinefinally · 06/06/2023 18:35

I volunteered for a charity for a couple of years and worked really hard for an 8 hour shift every week.
The CE drifted around arranging inappropriate publicity stunts and somehow managed to get a whole new house out of the charity money. Extraordinary.

IwantToRetire · 06/06/2023 18:36

And if it hasn't already been archived just click on the "Save" button and you'll get access to the article after it has been archived (and so will everyone else).

I thought that MNHQ had indicated that they didn't support archiving so that's why I was being indirect. In the past posts with archive links have been deleted.

So I just indicate how to find the link to avoid having post deleted.

IcakethereforeIam · 06/06/2023 18:37

Thank you @TheBiologyStupid and @IwantToRetire I couldn't remember the bit after archive.

The way Maria was treated. She was condemned by people doing exactly what they were accusing her of doing. The hypocrisy!

ResisterRex · 06/06/2023 18:47

In The Times.

Oxfam criticised over ‘JK Rowling hate figure’ in LGBT cartoon

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/f8d03094-0464-11ee-9bf2-8ca4db35d928?shareToken=20d61fbc5fbb1f6cfaeb7a6faf2bfab6

Croneofakind · 06/06/2023 18:59

ResisterRex · 05/06/2023 22:25

Oxfam is a lost cause. This was June 2021:

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/09/oxfam-training-guide-blames-privileged-white-women-root-causes/

"An Oxfam staff training document says “privileged white women” are supporting the root causes of sexual violence by wanting "bad men" imprisoned.
In the wake of sex scandals that have rocked the charity, Oxfam has produced guidance which states that: “Mainstream feminism centres on privileged white women and demands that ‘bad men’ be fired or imprisoned”.
Accompanied by a cartoon of a crying white woman, it adds that this “legitimises criminal punishment, harming black and other marginalised people”.
It advises staff to read a controversial book which concludes: “Mainstream feminism is supporting, not undoing, the root causes of sexual violence.”
Oxfam said that the training was voluntary, and the views are not presented as its own but designed to help staff understand the issues.
However, the charity was warned on Wednesday night that the document, compiled by its LGBT network and seen by The Telegraph, could breach equality laws as it suggests reporting rape is "contemptible".
The four-week “learning journey” recommends that staff read Me Not You: The Trouble with Mainstream Feminism, a book by Alison Phipps, a professor of gender studies at the University of Sussex.
Summarising the book’s central premise, the Oxfam document says white feminists need to ask themselves whether they are causing harm when they fight sexual violence.
It then links to Prof Phipps’s Twitter account and a thread which summarises the main themes of the book, including: “White feminist tears deploy white woundedness, and the sympathy it generates, to hide the harms we perpetuate through white supremacy.”
Naomi Cunningham, a discrimination and employment law barrister, says the document may breach the Equality Actt_, which bans harassment in the workplace on the basis of sex.
“The message seems to be that a woman who reports a rape or sexual assault to the police and presses charges is a contemptible ‘white feminist’,” said Ms Cunningham. “I think any woman could make an arguable case that this has created or contributed to ‘an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment’, which is how the Equality Act defines harassment.”
Learning About Trans Rights and Inclusion was drawn up in 2020, whilst Oxfam was still reeling from sexual exploitation scandals in Haiti and Chad.
The charity suffered further blows in April this year, when a female aid worker quit alleging that there was a “toxic culture” and her sexual harassment complaint had been ignored, and it faced separate allegations of sexual misconduct in the Democratic Republic of Congo."

It doesn't happen often but I am speechless with disbelief at what I just read. I knew oxfam was morally bankrupt but jeez 😨

IwantToRetire · 06/06/2023 19:02

The way Maria was treated.

And what's so frightening is knowing that there are other Marias, not just in Oxfam but else where.

And people (in the media) are going on about how nobody is really cancelled showing that they dont understand how wide spread the culture is now and some women are having to chose between speaking openly and keeping their job.

Vebrithien · 06/06/2023 19:23

I liked the Times article, I thought it was clear, and articulate.

Chersfrozenface · 06/06/2023 19:34

I wonder whether versions of the story will be in the print editions of the Mail, Telegraph and Times. And how many of the volunteers in Oxfam shops read those papers.

WhiteFire · 06/06/2023 19:35

Vebrithien · 06/06/2023 19:23

I liked the Times article, I thought it was clear, and articulate.

Though I'm not sure it is really a 'belief' that humans can't change sex.

spiderplantparty · 06/06/2023 19:37

That advertising campaign is dreadful. I wonder how many people were aware of it before it went live? To think that no one paused to think whether or not it was appropriate is awful.

WhiteFire · 06/06/2023 19:39

spiderplantparty · 06/06/2023 19:37

That advertising campaign is dreadful. I wonder how many people were aware of it before it went live? To think that no one paused to think whether or not it was appropriate is awful.

Time after time after time we are shown that they simply do not think, well not outside the correct thought charter.

FromAMNtter · 06/06/2023 19:39

WhiteFire · 06/06/2023 19:35

Though I'm not sure it is really a 'belief' that humans can't change sex.

It has to be framed as a belief to fall within the wording of the Equality Act and so be protected.

IwantToRetire · 06/06/2023 19:48

I liked the Times article, I thought it was clear, and articulate.

Well as it read like it was based on this thread of course it was!

Abhannmor · 06/06/2023 19:52

Haven't watched the animation but the image is a bit messy and confusing.

Except a white woman is scowling , front and centre with a helpful badge. Oxfam and Amnesty - how are the mighty fallen . So far and so fast.

WhiteFire · 06/06/2023 20:03

FromAMNtter · 06/06/2023 19:39

It has to be framed as a belief to fall within the wording of the Equality Act and so be protected.

Well that's just bloody ridiculous. Veganism is a belief, that the world is round is a fact, humans can't change sex is also a fact.

What a time to be alive that the latter has to be protected as a belief.

FromAMNtter · 06/06/2023 20:14

It is frustrating but the only protected characteristic it falls under is Religion or Belief

Fuck Oxfam
MerlinsLostMarbles · 06/06/2023 20:25

From what I've seen, the only people claiming the "TERF" woman in the cartoon is JK Rowling are gender criticals.

Oxfam have said the mean-looking characters aren't based on any real people so if gender criticals are looking at it and seeing a reflection of themselves, well, ...

Hoppinggreen · 06/06/2023 20:29

MerlinsLostMarbles · 06/06/2023 20:25

From what I've seen, the only people claiming the "TERF" woman in the cartoon is JK Rowling are gender criticals.

Oxfam have said the mean-looking characters aren't based on any real people so if gender criticals are looking at it and seeing a reflection of themselves, well, ...

Well of course Oxfam are completely trustworthy and we should believe everything that they say.

NecessaryScene · 06/06/2023 20:30

Oh, right, yes. Fuck Merlin while we're at it. I guess we did forget to mention that. (Although it really should go without saying.)

Ever considered a top charity role, Merl? You'd fit in perfectly here, and the opportunities would suit you.

Clymene · 06/06/2023 20:31

MerlinsLostMarbles · 06/06/2023 20:25

From what I've seen, the only people claiming the "TERF" woman in the cartoon is JK Rowling are gender criticals.

Oxfam have said the mean-looking characters aren't based on any real people so if gender criticals are looking at it and seeing a reflection of themselves, well, ...

Can you please stop referring to women you don't like as gender criticals. You can call us GC women or GC people but please don't take the noun out. It's dehumanising.

As to your other point, we'll colour me shocked. I wasn't expecting washed up hasbeen Billy Bragg to suddenly recognise that it was a horrible caricature.

I've noticed a lot of people are absolutely fine with the clearly racist drawings of the men who flank her too. Do you have anything to say about that or is that 👍 with you. I expect they deserve it, sitting near a horrid TERF.

Swipe left for the next trending thread