Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Transgender Loopholes

43 replies

CuriouslyDifferent · 26/04/2023 09:55

As some one who recently working in Education…

I find this deeply disturbing: see the section on Transgender.

https://www.gov.uk/request-copy-criminal-record

Extract:
Transgender applicationsContact the DBS transgender applications team if you’re a transgender applicant and you do not want to reveal details of your previous identity to a potential employer.

The ability of anyone to ‘hide their past’ as part of an application to with young and vulnerable people, is an unnecessary risk.

Request a basic DBS check

How to apply for a basic DBS check to get a copy of your criminal record, and what you must provide. It costs £18.

https://www.gov.uk/request-copy-criminal-record

OP posts:
Waitwhat23 · 26/04/2023 19:01

Having a GRC is one of the very few scenarios where a birth certificate can be reissued.

NancyDrawed · 26/04/2023 19:02

I do need to read the KPSS report!

I just remember some threads from a couple of years back when I was flabbergasted to learn of the massive safeguarding loophole name and/or gender change created. I could probably find them with a bit of searching

Birdsweepsin · 26/04/2023 19:11

NancyDrawed · 26/04/2023 18:59

thathuman

The way I see it is this. Imagine 'John Smith' has a series of convictions that would show up on a DBS check, so changes his name (and perhaps also, but not necessarily his gender) to Alex Jones.
He gets a new driving license and/or passport in his new name and has utility bills in his new name to back up his new identity.
He keeps out of trouble in his new name and applies for a DBS certificate in his new name.
There are no records of crime against Alex Jones and when he applies for the DBS, he does not disclose his former name.
Yes, it is a criminal offence, but he is not exactly the salt of the earth, having been convicted prior to changing his name.
How is he linked to his former crimes?

I think Alex would probably still have the same date of birth and address as John Smith.

If we assume Alex to be a person of genuinely good character, then he wouldn't run the risk of being found out, as the school/ hospital whatever would probably fire you on the spot for lying on your DBS.

Of course, if Alex has no such conscience... moved address a few times. Changed his d.o.b on a couple of documents...

But that's probably me just being paranoid. No-one would ever take advantage of the loophole. So we can all stop worrying!

dimorphism · 26/04/2023 19:13

MrsOvertonsWindow · 26/04/2023 15:53

Dead naming and doxxing paedophiles and sex offenders seems proportionate to me.
Safeguarding children should be the priority - not the demands of adults who claim to be the opposite sex.

This and the scary thing is in every other context safeguarding children comes first. It is quite explicit in Keeping Children Safe in Education that the children's safety comes before the adults safety in school - and that's actual physical safety not bloody hurt feelings.

How on earth this is allowed I don't know it's such an obvious safeguarding failure.

WhiteFire · 26/04/2023 19:17

Hmm this reads that it is down to the individual to inform the police of a need to change their name. Now what could possibly go wrong with that?

www.gires.org.uk/obtaining-your-gender-recognition-certificate/

Transgender Loopholes
WhiteFire · 26/04/2023 19:18

It is a "you can" rather than a "you are legally obligated to"

bellac11 · 26/04/2023 19:55

And away with this deadnaming nonsense.

I used to be Miss Smith and now Im Mrs Jones and someone called me Miss Smith the other day and now Im reporting a hate crime

Get over yourself!!!!

AlisonDonut · 26/04/2023 20:00

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

There is a special transgender loophole.

That is literally the title of the thread.

If you don't call the hotline to tell them you are actually a criminal, nobody will make that connection.

Plankingplanks · 26/04/2023 20:02

thathuman · 26/04/2023 15:59

Can you read or not?

CHANGING YOUR NAME OR GENDER DOESN'T MEAN YOUR CRIMES ARE SCRUBBED. THEY STAY WITH YOU. YOU STILL HAVE TO PAY FOR THOSE CRIMES.

Did that help?

@thatthathuman please stop shouting, especially when you are wrong.

Unless you declare your old name, if you have a GRC and haven't been rearrested you can get a clean DBS check if you don't declare your new name.

AlisonDonut · 26/04/2023 20:15

The KPSS report does mention I believe the fact that it is women on here that have been going on about this for years.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 26/04/2023 20:29

Plankingplanks · 26/04/2023 20:02

@thatthathuman please stop shouting, especially when you are wrong.

Unless you declare your old name, if you have a GRC and haven't been rearrested you can get a clean DBS check if you don't declare your new name.

Bawling, shouting and threatening is what transactivists always resort to in order to enforce ther personal beliefs on the rest of the population..
It's the reason we're in this mess with - unforgivably - safeguarding children being compromised in order to pander to adults claiming to be the opposite sex. 😑

Bosky · 26/04/2023 22:33

AmuseBish · 26/04/2023 18:58

If you're on this thread and you haven't read the KPSS report then you need to read it.

Quite!

And here is the link again for anyone who imagines that they can make an informed contribution without reading it. You can't, so stop wasting our time, ie. the way some PP have - PP who seem to think that SHOUTING, while missing the point entirely, is a substitute for informed debate.

https://kpssinfo.org/reports/

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

THE DISCLOSURE AND BARRING SERVICE: AN INTRODUCTION 6

DISCLOSURE AND BARRING SERVICE CHECKS 7

Standard DBS check
Filtering
Enhanced DBS check
Enhanced with Barred Lists DBS check
Adults’ and Children’s Barred Lists
Automatic barring offences (Autobar)
Disclosure
Referral
Barring Representations
Test for Regulated Activity
DBS update service
The application process
Sources of information for DBS checks
Police National Computer
Local police force records

IDENTITY VERIFICATION AND INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY RIGHTS 12

Individual privacy rights
Identity verification
Safeguarding loopholes: change of name
Name change by deed poll
Name change by statutory declaration
Safeguarding Alliance conclusions and recommendations
Government response
Safeguarding loopholes: change of name and gender
The Gender Recognition Act 2004
The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill
Self-declaration of gender
Driving licence
Passport
The DBS Sensitive Applications Route
Enhanced individual privacy rights
Safeguarding loopholes: concealing sex registered at birth
The Equality Act 2010 Schedule 9, Part 1
Digital identities: identity verification and safeguarding
What is a digital identity?
Data recording and disclosure
Digital identities and individual privacy rights
Digital identities and DBS checks

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27
Recommendation One:
mandatory use of National Insurance numbers for DBS checks and identity changes

Recommendation Two:
DBS certificates display sex registered at birth

Recommendation Three:
DBS certificates display other names used for all individuals

APPENDIX ONE: 34
HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF
EMPLOYMENT VETTING AND BARRING

Development and administration of the Barred Lists
Development of Regulated and Controlled Activities
The Bichard Inquiry Report

APPENDIX TWO: 38
SCREENSHOTS OF DBS CHECK APPLICATION

APPENDIX THREE: 45
SCREENSHOTS OF DIGITAL IDENTITY
CREATION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Disclosure and Barring Service plays a vital and unique role in safeguarding. By processing criminal record checks for individuals who have applied to work in roles where safeguarding considerations apply, the DBS allows organisations to access key information that will assist them
in making safer recruiting decisions. The ability of a DBS check to play this role in safeguarding rests entirely on the relevance, completeness and accuracy of the information returned and displayed on the DBS certificate.

In December 2003, Ian Huntley was convicted of the murders of two 10-year old girls, Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells. At the time of committing the murders, Huntley had been employed at a local college as a caretaker, a position that facilitated his access to children. Although he had previously come into contact with the police over alleged sexual offences on many occasions, this information had not been disclosed during the vetting check carried out at the time of his appointment.

It is no exaggeration to say that the murders of the two girls and the subsequent discovery that Huntley should, and could, have been prevented from taking up the role of caretaker had a profound effect throughout the country. In 2004, following an independent inquiry, the Bichard Inquiry Report was published. This concluded that there had been extensive omissions and failures in the vetting process.

Significantly, Huntley had been able to change his name by deed poll to Ian Nixon and the criminal record check he underwent had only been carried out against this new identity. By presenting a new identity, Huntley had successfully severed the link with his existing police records meaning that the records held against the name ‘Ian Huntley’ were not disclosed.

Eighteen years later safeguarding loopholes created where applicants submit identity documents for DBS checks that display a new identity remain.

Although the government has acknowledged the safeguarding loophole created where registered sex offenders are able to change their name by deed poll, the ability to change identity in a more fundamental way, by simultaneously changing both name and gender, remains unaddressed. Any individual can easily, and for any reason, change their name and gender on documents commonly used to establish identity via a process of self-declaration. These documents, that include passport and driving licence, can be presented for the purposes of a DBS check and will show the individual’s new name and their acquired gender instead of, and as opposite to, their sex.

The DBS grants enhanced privacy rights to individuals who change their gender when changing their identity. These are exceptional rights that are only granted to individuals from this group. The result is that identity verification is compromised, meaning that there is no guarantee that the information returned during the check and displayed on the certificate will be accurate or complete.

These exceptional privacy rights also allow an applicant who has changed gender to request that all their previous names are withheld from the DBS certificate that is issued. This right to conceal previous identities is not given to anyone else: disclosing previous identities is a key component of safeguarding and DBS certificates issued to all other individuals display all other names the applicant has used.

Applicants who change their gender are also permitted to conceal their sex and the DBS certificate issued will display their acquired gender instead. This right is not granted to any other individual: the importance of sex to safeguarding means that for all other applicants, their sex is always displayed.
These are all serious risks to safeguarding that compromise the validity and reliability of the DBS regime.

As digital identities are rolled out, including for DBS checks, the risk is that the existing loopholes will simply be perpetuated in the digital realm. In the drive for convenience and ease of use, digital identities also risk creating a new safeguarding loophole. In-person identity verification acts as a safeguarding protection in and of itself, yet digital identities can be shared remotely, meaning that this important step is removed.

The current operation of the DBS regime means that identity verification is compromised and organisations requesting DBS checks cannot have confidence in the information that is disclosed. In order to close these existing loopholes, we propose three recommendations:

  • Mandatory use of National Insurance numbers for DBS checks and identity changes
  • DBS certificates display sex registered at birth
  • DBS certificates display other names used for all applicants, including those who have changed gender as part of changing identity
In order to be effective, the rules of safeguarding must apply equally to everyone. Whenever the members of one group are excused from the normal requirements of safeguarding, a loophole is created that is ripe for exploitation.

Kate Coleman
Director, Keep Prisons Single Sex
September 2022
---

Please read the rest of the report to see if it answers any questions, rather than asking here, "So does this mean that . . . ?"

This subject has been discussed umpteen times on Mumsnet. We finally have solid information and the answers to many questions, where previously we lacked information and clarity and had to reply on assumptions:

https://kpssinfo.org/reports/

Reports - Keep Prisons Single Sex

The Keep Prisons Single Sex report on how the Scottish Prison Service is overlooking the sex-based needs of female offenders.

https://kpssinfo.org/reports

Shloommint · 27/04/2023 00:24

Dead naming and doxxing paedophiles and sex offenders seems proportionate to me.

You do know that not all transgender people having a DBS check will be ‘paedophiles and sex offenders’ right?

Anyone could change their name and not disclose their past name, hence creating a new identity not connected to any previous crimes. How often is someone ever asked to show a birth certificate for a job?

Shloommint · 27/04/2023 00:38

Applicants who change their gender are also permitted to conceal their sex and the DBS certificate issued will display their acquired gender instead. This right is not granted to any other individual

It’s granted to any other individual that has changed sex/ gender. Because if someone hasn’t changed sex it’s not relevant. Just like pregnancy rights are not granted to anyone who isn’t/hasn’t been pregnant.

The Huntley example given shows that if someone is going to do that it doesn’t need to involve a change of sex.

the importance of sex to safeguarding means that for all other applicants, their sex is always displayed. These are all serious risks to safeguarding that compromise the validity and reliability of the DBS regime.

This is just wrong. The purpose of a DBS check is not to predict future risk based on someone’s sex, it’s to check whether or not someone has committed previous crimes.

Bosky · 27/04/2023 02:07

Shloommint · 27/04/2023 00:38

Applicants who change their gender are also permitted to conceal their sex and the DBS certificate issued will display their acquired gender instead. This right is not granted to any other individual

It’s granted to any other individual that has changed sex/ gender. Because if someone hasn’t changed sex it’s not relevant. Just like pregnancy rights are not granted to anyone who isn’t/hasn’t been pregnant.

The Huntley example given shows that if someone is going to do that it doesn’t need to involve a change of sex.

the importance of sex to safeguarding means that for all other applicants, their sex is always displayed. These are all serious risks to safeguarding that compromise the validity and reliability of the DBS regime.

This is just wrong. The purpose of a DBS check is not to predict future risk based on someone’s sex, it’s to check whether or not someone has committed previous crimes.

"The purpose of a DBS check is not to predict future risk based on someone’s sex, it’s to check whether or not someone has committed previous crimes."

It is more than that - as you would know if you had read the report, but you haven't read the report, have you?
https://kpssinfo.org/reports

Extracts from

DBS CHECKS AND IDENTITY VERIFICATION:
SAFEGUARDING LOOPHOLES CREATED BY CHANGES OF IDENTITY

THE DISCLOSURE AND BARRING SERVICE: AN INTRODUCTION (Page 6)

Safeguarding refers to the framework of measures designed to protect the health, well-being and human rights of individuals. Where safeguarding measures are adequate and properly applied as part of an ongoing process, they allow people to live free from abuse, harm and neglect.

Certain groups of people are in particular need of safeguarding. These include children and vulnerable adults. The main pieces of legislation governing safeguarding are the Care Act 20142 for adults and the Children’s Act 20043 for children.

The purpose of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) is to help employers fulfil their safeguarding duties by enabling them to make safer recruitment decisions. The DBS does this by processing and issuing DBS checks for individuals who have applied to work in roles where safeguarding considerations apply. DBS checks disclose records of relevant past convictions, cautions, reprimands and warnings. Different levels of check can be requested: the level of check required will be determined by the nature of the role for which the individual is applying. The DBS also maintains
the Adults’ and Children’s Barred Lists and makes decisions as to whether an individual should be included on one or both of these lists and hence barred from working with vulnerable groups.

The DBS does not undertake individual case-by- case assessments. Rather, this is a category-based system of disclosure specified by legislation. This means that certain convictions must be disclosed as part of a DBS check and where an individual has committed a particular offence, they must be included on the relevant Barred List. A category- based system has the benefit of legal certainty and also reflects the strong public expectation for proper standards of protection against threats to the welfare and safety of the public, particularly that of children and vulnerable adults. By contrast, a system of individual case-by-case assessments introduces the possibility for ambiguity and inconsistency.

The DBS is a non-departmental public body accountable to parliament through the Secretary of State for the Home Office. The functions of the DBS are those contained within the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006,4 Part V of the Police Act 1997,5 the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups (Northern Ireland) Order 20076 and Protection of Freedoms Act 20127.
See Appendix One for the history and development of employment vetting and barring.

1 https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/disclosure-and-barring-service/about
2 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/contents
3 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/31/contents
4 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/47/contents
5 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/50/part/V
6 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisi/2007/1351/contents
7 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/contents

Adults’ and Children’s Barred Lists (Page 9)

The Adults’ and Children’s Barred Lists are lists of people who have been barred from working with vulnerable adults and with children respectively.
It is a criminal offence for a person to work with members of a group from which they have been barred from working. The lists record the following information:

  • Title
  • Surname
  • Forenames
  • Date of Birth
  • Gender 17
17 Email correspondence dated 16 May 2022

The application process (Page 10)

The application process is completed online. The individual in respect of whom the DBS check is being carried out is required to provide a minimum of three current original documents. Collectively these must confirm:

  • Current legal name
  • Current address
  • Date of birth
Where a Responsible Organisation has requested the DBS check, the ID checks should be carried out with the individual face-to-face.

We completed an Enhanced with Children’s Barred List DBS check (see Appendix Two). For the purposes of this DBS check, the individual provided: current valid passport; current photo card driving licence; bank/building society statement. In addition to providing their current address, the individual must also provide any additional addresses for the previous five years. No supporting evidence of these is required and this question relies upon the individual’s honesty in providing a truthful and complete answer. There is an opportunity to provide any previous names used. Again, no supporting evidence of these is required and this question relies upon the individual’s willingness to provide a truthful answer.

The DBS certificate issued to the individual displayed the following information:

  • All other names disclosed by the applicant
  • Police records of convictions, cautions, reprimands and warnings
  • Information from the list held under Section 142 of the Education Act 2002
  • DBS Children’s Barred List information
  • DBS Adults’ Barred List information (in this case the information was not requested)
  • Other relevant information disclosed at the Chief Police Officer(s) discretion

Safeguarding loopholes: change of name and gender (Page 16)

The ability to change identity by what is arguably a more fundamental degree, by changing both name and gender also presents a risk to safeguarding. Not only is the individual able to change their name on identity documentation, but they are also able to overwrite the recording of their sex registered
at birth with their acquired gender, including in some cases on their birth certificate. In this way, individuals are able to change the recording of
two key identity markers, one of which, sex, is a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010.46 Correctly ascertaining sex registered at birth may form an important part of safeguarding and concealing this on a DBS certificate may present a particular risk including where protections for women and children are concerned.

There are two ways by which a change of identity consisting of change of name and change of gender may be affected: by obtaining a gender recognition certificate in accordance with the provisions of the Gender Recognition Act 2004,47 and by a process of self-declaration. Clearly,
this is not to suggest that every person who changes their identity either in accordance with the Gender Recognition Act 2004 or via a process of self-declaration does so with nefarious intent. However, a loophole has been created which whose who seek to hide their existing identity and thereby gain access to children and vulnerable adults are able to exploit.

This risk to safeguarding was unaddressed by the Safeguarding Alliance. Although their report recommended that the automatic right to change one’s name should be denied to registered sex offenders, the ability of registered sex offenders to change identity by other means is unaddressed and unchallenged. Where such an identity change is undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Gender Recognition Act 2004, the individual acquires a new copy birth certificate which records the individual’s acquired and legally recognised gender in lieu of and as opposite to their sex as registered at birth. Hence, the report’s recommendation that birth certificates be a mandatory requirement for DBS checks would provide insufficient protection.

46 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
47 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/7/contents

Safeguarding loopholes: concealing sex registered at birth (Page 22)

Additional safeguarding risks may present when an individual, on the basis of changing their identity, is able to conceal their sex registered at birth on their DBS certificate. This will occur when the identity documents submitted for the purposes of the DBS check record the individual’s self-declared gender identity or legal gender instead of, and as opposite to, their sex registered at birth. In this set of circumstances, the DBS certificate issued to the individual will not display their sex registered at birth. Rather the certificate will show the individual’s self-declared gender identity or legal gender. Where a DBS check has been requested for a role to provide a single-sex service on a same-sex basis, it will be particularly important that the sex registered at birth of the individual is known.

As before, this is not to suggest that every person who seeks to change their gender, whether via self-declaration or in accordance with the Gender Recognition Act 2004, does so in order to evade safeguarding. However, granting individuals the ability to change their gender as part of a change of identity has created a loophole that may be exploited by those acting with ill intent.

The Equality Act 2010 Schedule 9, Part 168 (Page 22 - 23)

The Equality Act 2010 sets out when discrimination on the basis of what are known as protected characteristics is unlawful. The nine protected characteristics are set out in Chapter 1: 69 70

  • age
  • disability
  • gender reassignment 71
  • marriage or civil partnership (in employment only)
  • pregnancy and maternity
  • race
  • religion or belief
  • sex
Schedule 9 provides an exception to what would otherwise be unlawful direct discrimination in relation to work. The exception applies where being of a particular sex, race, disability, religion or belief, sexual orientation or age is a crucial requirement for the post. Applying the requirement must be a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate aim. The exception also applies where not being transgender is a requirement.

Schedule 9 Part 1 provides that where a separate- sex or single-sex service is provided, as is permissible under the single-sex exceptions set out in Schedule 3,72 roles that provide those services may be lawfully restricted to those having a particular protected characteristic, in this case sex:

A person (A) does not contravene a provision mentioned in sub-paragraph (2) by applying in relation to work a requirement to have a particular protected characteristic, if A shows that, having regard to the nature or context of the work—
(a) it is an occupational requirement,
(b) the application of the requirement is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, and
(c) the person to whom A applies the requirement does not meet it (or A has reasonable grounds for not being satisfied that the person meets it).
Paragraph 3 of Part 1 provides that it is lawful to also exclude a ‘transsexual person’ who has the protected characteristic gender reassignment:
(3) The references in sub-paragraph (1) to a requirement to have a protected characteristic are to be read—
(a) in the case of gender reassignment, as references to a requirement not to be a transsexual person (and section 7(3) is accordingly to
be ignored);

This means that all individuals whose sex registered at birth is male, regardless of their gender identity or whether they are in receipt of a gender recognition certificate, can lawfully be excluded from roles that provide single-sex services to women and girls on a same-sex basis under Schedule 3. Examples include roles providing intimate care to women and girls, or providing counselling services to female victims of rape. These provisions in the Equality Act 2010 provide protection for the privacy and other fundamental rights and freedoms of women and girls on the basis of their biological sex. For this reason, it is important that service providers recruiting for these roles have accurate information concerning applicants’ sex registered at birth.

The application of the Schedule 9 exceptions hinges on the ability to properly balance the rights of individuals in a way that is achievable in practice. In our opinion, where the right of an individual to have their sex registered at birth overwritten with their legal gender or self-declared gender identity on a DBS certificate for a role subject to Schedule 9 Part 1 overrides the right of a service user to receive that single-sex service on a same-sex basis, the balance of rights is wrong.

Enhanced and expanded privacy rights mean that individuals who wish to are able to conceal their sex registered at birth on the identity documents they present for a DBS check. This means that the DBS certificate issued will not display the individual’s sex registered at birth. As a result, service providers recruiting for single-sex services provided on a same-sex basis are unable to meet their basic safeguarding requirements and are unable to make the decisions needed in order to facilitate the operation of the service.

68 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/schedule/9
69 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/part/2/chapter/1
70 Under the Equality Act 2010 all protected characteristics are considered separately: they operate in parallel. Consequently, the protected characteristic gender reassignment is not a ‘feeder’ into the protected characteristic sex. Thus, a person whose sex registered at birth is male who has a gender recognition certificate showing their acquired gender as female is not covered by the protected characteristic sex ‘woman’. The February 2022 judgment handed down in the reclaiming motion brought by the campaign group For Women Scotland in respect of their petition for judicial review of the Scottish Government’s decision by way of the Gender Representation on the Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 to implement certain positive action measures supports this. ( www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/cos-general-docs/pdf-docs-for- opinions/2022csih4.pdf?sfvrsn=7920df79_1) The challenge included the definition of “woman” in section 2 of the Act which would allow persons whose sex registered at birth is male and who have the protected characteristic gender reassignment to be defined as “women” for the purposes of the Act. The judgment found in favour of For Women Scotland, ruling that the definition of “woman” in section 2 of the Act is outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament in that it relates to reserved matters. As such “woman” in the Act should be defined in the same way as in section 212(1) of the Equality Act 2010, such that “woman” means “a female of any age”. In the judgment, Lady Dorrian commented on the protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010. At paragraph 37, she states that within the protected characteristic gender reassignment “no distinction is made between those for whom the relevant process [of gender reassignment] would involve reassignment male to female or vice versa... In other words, it is the attribute of proposing to undergo, undergoing or having undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassignment which is the common factor, not the sex into which the person is reassigned.” At paragraph 38, she notes that the Equality Act 2010 maintains the distinct categories of protected characteristics. She further explains at paragraph 49, “by incorporating those transsexuals living as women in the definition of woman the 2018 Act conflates and confuses two separate and distinct protected characteristics” and at paragraph 40, that “transgender woman” is not a protected characteristic.
71 The protected characteristic gender reassignment applies independently of whether or not the individual has been issued with a gender recognition certificate.
72 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/schedule/3

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Page 27)

DBS checks play an important role in safeguarding and help organisations make safer recruiting decisions. DBS procedures are designed to both deter unsuitable people from applying to work with vulnerable groups and to assist organisations in identifying and rejecting them if they do. Organisations are only able to rely on the DBS checking process to the extent that the checking systems are robust and the information displayed on DBS certificates is both accurate and complete.

However, where an individual changes their gender as part of changing their identity, the DBS grants them an extraordinary level of privacy, wholly unlike that granted to any other individual. This has created loopholes whereby an individual is able to conceal their past identities for the purpose of the checking process and request that past names they have used are not displayed on the DBS certificate issued to them. The loopholes mean that organisations have no way of knowing whether or not the information displayed on any DBS certificate presented to them is an accurate and complete record concerning that individual. The loopholes mean that current faith in the rigour and utility of DBS checks is, regrettably, misplaced. These are serious risks to safeguarding and compromise the DBS system in its entirety.

Although safeguarding loopholes resulting from the ability of registered sex offenders to change their names via deed poll have been acknowledged by the government, there is a reluctance to appreciate that those loopholes are only one part of the risk to safeguarding that the enhanced right to privacy given to those who change their gender has created. Including a change of gender when creating a new identity can be achieved via self-declaration and is something that anyone can do and for whatever reason.

We propose three recommendations:

  • Mandatory use of National Insurance numbers for DBS checks and identity changes
  • DBS certificates display sex registered at birth
  • DBS certificates display other names used for all applicants, including those who have changed gender as part of changing identity
We believe that, together, these recommendations are sufficient to close the current loopholes in the DBS system.

Recommendation Two: (Page 29-30)
DBS certificates display sex registered at birth

Currently, an individual is able to have their legal gender or self-declared gender identity recorded on their DBS certificate in lieu of, and as opposite to, their sex registered at birth. This presents additional and separate risks to safeguarding that exist independently of whether checks have been conducted against all the identities an individual has used, meaning that the rest of the information displayed on the certificate is complete and accurate.

As previously discussed, where legal gender or self-declared gender identity is displayed instead of sex registered at birth, there is a particular safeguarding risk when the DBS check has been requested for the purposes of a role specified in accordance with the provisions in Schedule 9 Part 1 of the Equality Act 2010 to provide single-sex services. As a general principle, when working with children or vulnerable adults, there will always be sex-based safeguarding considerations even if Schedule 9 is not formally invoked.

Our recommendation is that DBS certificates display the individual’s sex registered at birth. This can be ascertained by checking against the individual’s National Insurance number.86 We recommend:

  • That the DBS certificate data field currently labelled ‘gender’ is renamed ‘sex’
  • That DBS certificates for Standard, Enhanced and Enhanced with Barred Lists checks display the individual’s sex registered at birth and not their self-declared gender identity or legal gender

These recommendations do not impact upon a transgender individual’s current ability to change their identity documents and/or birth certificate and to present these as proof of identity to a prospective employer. Individuals may still change identity via self-declaration or in accordance with the Gender Recognition Act 2004, as they wish.

These recommendations do, however, impact on the privacy of a transgender person for whom a Standard, Enhanced or Enhanced with Barred Lists DBS check is requested: the DBS certificate will display their sex registered at birth, not their acquired gender. However, if the current safeguarding loopholes are to be closed, this is unavoidable. This impact on privacy can be mitigated against by including the requirement that all individuals for whom such DBS checks have been requested are informed that the DBS certificate will record their sex registered at birth as ascertained from their National Insurance record. Those individuals who, on that basis, do not wish to proceed, are free to withdraw and the application can be terminated. Those who wish to proceed may tick a box that affirms their consent to this. This will also ensure that in respect of transgender individuals who have been issued with a gender recognition certificate that there is no risk of a breach of section 22 of the Gender Recognition Act 2004: they will have consented to their sex registered at birth being shared for this purpose.

When considering the impact on privacy, it is important to note that Schedule 9 Part 1 of the Equality Act 2010 permits the lawful exclusion of
all those whose sex registered at birth is male, including those with the protected characteristic gender reassignment and who may present identity documents recording their legal gender or self- declared gender identity as female. In order for that lawful exclusion to operate and for the single- sex service to function as the service provider intends, it is clearly necessary to determine the sex registered at birth of those male individuals who present identity documents displaying their acquired gender as female.

86 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/transgender-customers-summary-of-dwps-policy-in-respect-of-the-retention-of-information/summary-of-dwps-policy-on-the-retention-of-information-relating-to-transgender-customers

Recommendation Three: (Page 30)

DBS certificates display other names used for all individuals
A DBS certificate standardly displays all other names the individual has used because those who are responsible for safeguarding need to know these when applicants seek to work with children and vulnerable adults. However, an individual who is eligible to use the Sensitive Applications Route, a service specifically intended to protect the privacy of transgender applicants, can request that their DBS certificate does not show their previous identities. Whilst the DBS considers that the individual privacy rights of those who change their gender outweigh some of the requirements for safeguarding, this level of privacy is not granted to any other group. No other individual is entitled to have their previous names hidden in this way.

By enabling those who have changed their gender to keep their previous identities secret from those responsible for safeguarding, the DBS has created a loophole that is ripe for exploitation.

We recommend:
• That DBS certificates record previously used names for all individuals.

Reports - Keep Prisons Single Sex

The Keep Prisons Single Sex report on how the Scottish Prison Service is overlooking the sex-based needs of female offenders.

https://kpssinfo.org/reports

WhiteFire · 27/04/2023 07:40

The Huntley example given shows that if someone is going to do that it doesn’t need to involve a change of sex.

You have completely misunderstood the relevance of this. The whole system was overhauled in response to IH, with the aim that it didn't happen again.

The current system has the same loophole under a different guise.

Ofcourseshecan · 27/04/2023 16:33

Shloommint · 27/04/2023 00:24

Dead naming and doxxing paedophiles and sex offenders seems proportionate to me.

You do know that not all transgender people having a DBS check will be ‘paedophiles and sex offenders’ right?

Anyone could change their name and not disclose their past name, hence creating a new identity not connected to any previous crimes. How often is someone ever asked to show a birth certificate for a job?

Do you genuinely think it’s OK if not all people seeking to work with children are paedophiles? Just some? And they mustn’t be discriminated against?

Mindblowing.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 27/04/2023 19:01

Shloommint · 27/04/2023 00:24

Dead naming and doxxing paedophiles and sex offenders seems proportionate to me.

You do know that not all transgender people having a DBS check will be ‘paedophiles and sex offenders’ right?

Anyone could change their name and not disclose their past name, hence creating a new identity not connected to any previous crimes. How often is someone ever asked to show a birth certificate for a job?

You've never filled in a DBS form have you @Shloommint ? And I presume you're not a parent? And have evidently not encountered a paedophile working with children? And you've not read Bosky's lik pasted below?

There should be NO exceptions for any group - no sacred caste that allows some people to hide any aspects of their history. Because that's what the paedophiles and predators use - the loopholes to hide their identity.
We have these systems because children's safety is meant to be the ultimate priority. Allowing some people to avoid accountability because they're oh so special and the rules that apply to everyone mustn't apply to them is dangerous - especially for children.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread