Anti-Woman Brands Website - Boycotts, Alternatives, Resources

[Bosky]

This seems to be a very new site with plans to add more. Very handy reference and there is a Submission/Contact Page to submit extra entries.

ANTI-WOMAN BRANDS
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/

Women continue to be mocked and sidelined by countless companies.

• Necessary items and procedures for women remain inaccessible.
• Charities, organizations, and women's only spaces are disappearing.
• Women are increasingly demonized by TRAs for speaking up about women's issues.

All brands listed here have chosen to align themselves with persons, organizations, and movements that continue to hurt women. Most brands like to align themselves as "woke" so it's probably impossible to compile an exhaustive list. Things are added as they come up.

Brands
> Brands Master List
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/brands

> Megacorps
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/megacorps

> Health/Beauty
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/HealthBeauty

> Food/Home
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/foodhome

> Clothing/Fashion
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/clothingfashion

> Dylan Sponsors
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/dylan

Other things
> Misogynistic Brands
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/otherbrands

> Find Alternatives
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/alternatives

Submissions
> Qualifying Process
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/process

> Submit/Contact
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/submissions

More info
> Charities
Please consider donating to or supporting women's organizations that work to help women and children in need around the world.
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/charities

>Plans/Change Log
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/plans

> Resources
https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/resources

Inside the CEI system pushing brands to endorse celebs like Dylan Mulvaney
New York Post - April 7, 2023

Executives at companies like Nike, Anheuser-Busch and Kate Spade, whose brand endorsements have turned controversial trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney into today’s woke “It girl,” aren’t just virtue signaling.
They’re handing out lucrative deals to what were once considered fringe celebrities because they have to — or risk failing an all-important social credit score that could make or break their businesses.

At stake is their Corporate Equality Index — or CEI — score, which is overseen by the Human Rights Campaign, the largest LGBTQ+ political lobbying group in the world.

HRC, which has received millions from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation among others, issues report cards for America’s biggest corporations via the CEI: awarding or subtracting points for how well companies adhere to what HRC calls its “rating criteria.”

Businesses that attain the maximum 100 total points earn the coveted title “Best Place To Work For LGBTQ Equality.” Fifteen of the top 20 Fortune-ranked companies received 100% ratings last year, according to HRC data.

Continued at:
https://nypost.com/2023/04/07/inside-the-woke-scoring-system-guiding-american-companies/

ESG (Environmental Social Governance Investor Policies) and PGE (Partnership for Global Equality)

Let Women Speak - Hyde Park Corner - 2 April 2023 - Short Speech
s

"This thread is one of the MOST IMPORTANT things you can read if you want to understand how gender ideology is spreading through corporations and educational institutions.

This will focus on how ESG is responsible for the virulent spread of GI."

https://twitter.com/xxclusionary/status/1638518082573332483

Threadreader:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1638518082573332483.html

Archived on Archive Today and Web Archive Org
(adding the archive links creates a bizarre formatting mess so if the the Twitter thread disappears you will just have to paste that link into one of the archive sites)

Thanks for exposing the true objectives here - the eradication of trans people from any advertising or publicity.

I clicked into about 7 or 8 of those brands and the only objection seems to be that they have a trans person on a publicity campaign. So the only objective now can be that trans people should not be on those sorts of publicity campaigns.

Sort of shows that the ‘wear what you like, call yourself what you like’ is a load of BS.

You have it wrong. This is the problem:

*All brands listed here have chosen to align themselves with persons, organizations, and movements that continue to hurt women. *

When brands sponsor males to promote menstrual products, who is being "eradicated" from advertising and publicity?

Whose means of earning a living is being diminished and whose lives, suffering and humanity is being mocked?

Thanks for the list Bosky - very helpful. The YouTube videos seem to be silent - could you post the hyperlink?

There are 78 brands listed under your link.

Only one of them is in respect of period products.

This is just a confirmation that transphobes hate trans people being able to advertise stuff.

This is just a confirmation that transphobes hate trans people being able to advertise stuff.

Not stuff. Women’s products. Who are you calling transphobes? Is that directed at the OP?

What women’s products? Most of the 78 brands being attacked are not specific to one gender.

@TeaKlaxon who were you directing your previous comment to? The OP?

Thanks for posting this list. Really helpful.

A list of brands that are 'anti' or harmful to woman and no nestle?

'while the character on the show is just a genderspecial, the voice actor is a trans identified male'

So trans people aren't even allowed to work now?

It plays when I click it. Unfortunately Mumsnet automatically converts YouTube links into embedded videos so if I post the link again it will do the same thing.

If you click on the video in the post and then where it says "YouTube" it will open the video in YouTube so you can check if it plays with sound for you there.

It is possible that your Browser settings are responsible for there being no sound when you play it as an embedded video.

As mentioned in the OP, this seems to be a very new site and submissions for additional sites are welcomed by whoever set it up - fill yer boots with Nestlé! 👇

https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/process

There have been protests and the actors, producers and companies have been vilified when trans characters have not been played by trans actors.

Are you happy to be inclusive about who plays trans characters?

Ah damnit. I just switched to dove deodorant because my old brand changed their formula and it gives me a rash now, so I guess I'll be switching again.

@Bosky I know you don't need it explained to you why that is the case. And even if I were to concede that you have a point, why then does one role, of a non binary character, played by a trans person warrant a boycott on the company?

Because these folk don’t believe in ‘wear what you want and call yourself what you want’. They believe that trans people just having jobs publicising beer or voicing a character is a problem.

This agenda has never been about ‘protecting women’ (which is why women are more supportive of trans rights than men are) it has been about eroding the rights of trans people. Including now the right to have any sort of public facing promotional work.

At stake is their Corporate Equality Index — or CEI — score, which is overseen by the Human Rights Campaign, the largest LGBTQ+ political lobbying group in the world.

Is there any similar index for how corporations treat women's rights?

As far as I can tell, all the negatives from the trans rights demands fall on only one sex class, the female one.

When this is not discussed at all and when women who point that out are labeled bigots we get the current situation where Dylan Mulvaney is hailed and rewarded for parodying not only womanhood but girlhood. Mulvaney is not the age to be a girl yet gets letters of congratulations for those ghastly parodies of girlhood from the US vice president. This is sexism in a new dress.

"Including now the right to have any sort of public facing promotional work."

I know, it's shocking how little media attention and promotional work trans people get. I am struggling to recall the last time a member of that teeny weeny percentage of the population was on TV or radio, or in the papers, or won a Women's Prize or competition, or was lauded as "the first female to do X", or had a special day to celebrate their remarkable contribution to society by simply existing.

Perhaps you could persuade some of these companies to share the trans-lurve more widely, rather than lumbering poor Dylan with the arduous task of raking in all the moolah?

https://antiwomanbrands.neocities.org/dylan

If a transman advertised a product that helped with prostate cancer, would you think that was acceptable?

Just had a look at the master list. If this is a comprehensive list of misogynist companies, where is Hobby Lobby? In case people have forgotten, the vile assholes who went to court to deny their women employees the right to contraception.

Have you looked at the website the OP cited.

There is nothing comparable to your prostate cancer analogy.

But if there was an ad for, say, Movember and a trans man featured as a man who was fundraising and campaigning to reduce prostate cancer deaths, despite not being at risk himself, why on earth would that be a problem?

The difference, to me, is what a transgender person is supposed to represent in the ad. If Mulvaney, for example, was used in a beer ad to represent the transgender market for that beer, fine.

If it's something specifically about one sex, such as menstruation, and the transgender person used in the ad is male, I would need a much stronger reason why someone to whom the product doesn't matter should take that role.

Why would a male person advertise period products, for example? Should we use a trans man, a female person, to speak about prostate cancer?

Women get angry because much of this is a forced redefinition of who we are, who we have always lived as, and when we complain about that we are called bigots. So accept that 'woman' now means a bundle of sexist stereotypes about femininity, accept that your own embodied identity as a woman is now invalid, or be regarded as something heinous.

And that new definition of 'woman' will make it extremely hard to do feminist work fighting against sex-based oppression as we will no longer even be able to define the victim group it affects.