King's College

[DdraigGoch]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/26/transgender-athlete-research-rejected-professor-called-trans

Apparently sensitivity is more important than accuracy and clarity. Referring to transwomen as "male" when surveying people about sport is "not appropriate".

Obviously we haven't seen the research proposal, but on the face of it this looks like a stupid decision. How unlucky for them that the WAA decision coincides with their decision being made public!

This is normal. All research that might be ethical and balanced is shut down. It's why the NHS have been "treating " children with off label, dangerous drugs that we now know have harmful long term effects.
They ban research so that any old delusion can be taken as fact. The real definition of useful idiots.

TRAs will use anything they can to stop data collection and analysis because they know it won’t support their world view.

So crazy, you HAVE to be a male to be a transwoman. It is pretty much the only criteria.

Alternatives to 'female' imposed upon us: menstruators, cervix-havers, chest-feeders.

Seems perfectly reasonable to impose alternatives to 'male'. I suggest dick-swingers, wankers, ball-havers.

1. They are male

2. Lying about this helps no one

3. Sensitivity as a 'male only' thing, demanded but not reciprocated, is just misogyny on crack.

Time to make sure your kids don't apply to Kings College London.

Prostate-people, sperm-providers, Assigned Dickie At Birth…