I wonder if, at the periphery of her understanding that she's realising this has nothing to do with including transmen in anything. Nothing at all.
Transmen are women. And transmen are a tiny subset of women, at that. In what world have a tiny cohort of women been able to influence language across the board like this? In healthcare, female charities, government policies, social media, the lot?
Certainly not a patriarchal world. No-one listens to women or cares what they want. And certainly not the in blatant, misogynistic world of trans ideology. There are only three famous transmen (and one of those is only famous for giving birth).
No. This is not driven by women who identify as men.
This is driven by men identifying as women. They are trying, at every turn, to decouple the word woman from female biology, in order that they can claim the word woman for themselves. They cannot have it, under any circumstances, being reliant on female biology or anatomy. Because they don't possess any.
Hence the women being reduced to individual functions but not men or transwoman. No-one calls men penis havers or ejaculators, however they identify. Males are divided into men and 'women'.
Who can forget Munroe Bergdorf saying women were only allowed to march in the women's march - their own march - as long as they didn't centre their anatomy, by wearing pussy hats.
Even then, the men were desperately trying to separate the concept of woman from her own biology.