Au contraire, there is everything to say he approves of it:
He explained that he had put his hand on two girls’ legs, just above the knee and on top of their clothes. In one instance, this was during a breaktime game involving several other pupils, male and female; in the other, it was during a conversation with a girl with whom he often talked on the phone at weekends and in the evenings. Neither had reacted in any way. They hadn’t told him to take his hand away, but another girl had seen both incidents and began telling others that he had been “touching up” girls.
His son had touched girls on their thighs without their consent and they didn't say anything. Somehow, it's another girl's fault that his son was called out for touching girls without consent.
he had caused girls that he thought of as his friends, with whom he thought he was innocently flirtingng_, to feel uncomfortable. He had clearly made a mistake, he was contrite and wanted to apologise and move on*
Now his behaviour is innocent. Sexual touching is a mistake and Dad and son think that he should just be allowed to say sorry and move on.
we were shocked to be told that there were allegations from other girls in addition to the two incidents our son had described. He denied there were any others and, in a Kafkaesque flourish, the school did not give us any further details.
These were not the first girls his son had sexually touched.
the two female officers read out the other accusations, which were that he had groped a girl’s bottom and touched another’s thigh. Having seen his horrified reaction to hearing this accusation for the first time, and his categorical denial that he had ever behaved in such a way,
So the police said that he'd touched two further girls and the kid was horrified. But why? He's already admitted he's touched two girls' thighs.
the school’s reaction was disproportionate, but in the current environment it’s easy to understand how its first response was to slip into a defensive mode, wanting to protect itself from any suggestion that it was not taking alleged sexual harassment of its female pupils seriously
I'm intrigued as to what daddy thought would have been appropriate reaction. If it has been his son who had been sexually assaulted. Or his daughter? What would be proportionate?
I very much suspect that this kid had a very very expensive lawyer who urged him to look horrified. And I also suspect these weren't the only four girls he groped.