Agreed. There is no logical, civil rights based, safeguarding conscious, morally sound argument for men, who wish to behave and dress as a particular gender stereotype, to then occupy spaces reserved for biological females. There just isn't a single, good argument for why women need to accommodate this, and why men shouldn't expand their bandwidths and accommodate members of their own sex, no matter how they wish to behave and dress. On their own, the TRA arguments do not stand up - which is why they need to bandwagon the genuine suffering of other groups, in order to gain traction via guilt tripping and ignorance.