Daily Mail article about "controversial transgender prisoner, 6ft 5in Katie Dolatowski"

[unclebuck]

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11684997/Read-killer-born-man-woman-identifies-BABY.html

It's a no holds barred account. This doesn't seem possible even 6 months ago.

It will be interesting to see if any of this makes a difference to the intent to actually vote SNP. As far as I can see, it's made no difference. Nicola Sturgeon may get a bit uncomfortable but that looks to be about it. That's the problem.

HE! In the mail!

And downn the wall goes.

So that’s two obvious and deliberate IPSO breaches in one day, both by female columnists, Janice Turner in the Times, Amanda Platell in the Mail.

Plus I just found this Julie Bindell one from a couple of days ago (but it might be an online only article, and they aren’t IPSO compulsory compliant?)

www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-11677219/Trans-rapist-female-prison-proves-legal-sacrificed-vulnerable-women-Julie-Bindel-says.html

Who is next? Suzanne Moore at the Telegraph? Hadley Freeman at Sunday Times? Sarah Vine at Daily Mail? I bet they’ve all protested this Orwellian madness to their bosses many times?

And Julie Birchall has surely been waiting for this day for years already (but I don’t think she’s a columnist at present? Freelance contributors might find it harder to get the back up? Presume there are insurance differences when it comes to legal fees?)

Here’s the list of those signed up to the compulsory scheme:

The following publications have agreed to participate in the compulsory IPSO arbitration scheme. This means they must accept any genuine arbitration claim.

Reach Plc

Daily Mirror
Sunday Mirror
Sunday People
Daily Express
Sunday Express
Daily Star
New!
OK!
Star Magazine

Telegraph Media Group

The Daily Telegraph
The Sunday Telegraph
The Weekly Telegraph

News UK

The Sun
The Times
The Sunday Times
The Times Literary Supplement

Associated Newspapers

Daily Mail
The Mail on Sunday
Metro

(Please note that Mail Online and Metro.co.uk are not participating in the scheme)

Should I start a new thread for this discussion?

A thread would be good Cloglady. The history of how trans activist groups were allowed to muzzle the press is alarming.

Hadley has retweeted Janice’s Times piece - I’m now wondering if there has been some coordination in a whatsapp group for terfy female journos.

I wonder where all the women identifying as babies are? Or are they all too busy being grown ups?

Creepy as. They should not be indulging any of this nonsense. Puréed food and nappies? Hand holding?

Babies don’t speak. They don’t write. How is he managing to express his wishes? Through the medium of gurgling?

Perhaps the likes of Nicola and her cronies should be personally responsible for their care.

@Chersfrozenface

But if he “really does” think he’s a baby then, under mental health, he would be classed as delusional and treated accordingly. The treatment wouldn’t include colluding with his delusions; quite the opposite.

Delusional patients who think they are Jesus aren’t crucified by their medical teams.

Well, no, quite.

Shall we try "mental / emotional wellbeing"? He is given a dummy for the sake of his mental / emotional wellbeing?

I'm clutching at straws TBH. I've no idea what justification SPS claims to have here

I know what the real reason is though - the influence of Queer Theory advocates on policy.

I said on another thread; Jane Garvey and Fi Glover both used He etc when this story broke on their Times Radio show earlier in the week.

This is so welcome!

You betcha the pro women are all in a WhatsApp! (Guess and jest but wouldn't be surprised!)

Garvey briefly reiterates a sentence after using a he with this person but Fi used He at the start.

They're still dancing about a little, presumably because of both guidance and also the awful framing the interviewee, Paulette Hamilton, Labour MP for Birmingham Erdington, makes of their question. Fi give a great retort but then holds her head in her hands.

twitter.com/timesradio/status/1618280972885057537?s=46&t=QeVkFxiYgiUwR2Paw7zipQ

Sorry, "this person."

Great point, nicely put!

from another thread

Spero · Yesterday 07:57

Wish me luck! I have decided that it's important to use sex based pronouns when discussing why sex is important. Hopefully there will be further discussions on Saturday.

twitter.com/svphillimore/status/1618874108149895169?s=46&t=eoVwqgjLs_ZVjhWNTQnOOA

Sarah said after going up against Robin she wasnt playing anymore

This is exhilarating 😂

I absolutely agree!
Especially when those that some of us would have expected to be in the same place - natural allies, haven't even had the common decency to be worse than useless but trying, rather, that they have deliberately acted in a way diametrically opposed to the needs of women and children.
They have put women and children at serious risk of harm, either by allowing men into spaces where they shouldn't be, or in encouraging people to consent to mutilating their bodies. In both cases, leaving permanent scars either in the literal sense, or in terms of mental trauma, or maybe both.
For that i will not forgive any of them! Ever!

*Thingybob · Today 01:25

Why is 36 year old Daniel Eastwood (who identifies as a baby) in a young offenders institution?

The SPS site says Polmont is for young people between 16 and 21

I mean, who else gets to choose where they serve time? That's right, nobody. Well, just transw.

I used to vote SNP. I will never vote SNP again. I can't be the only one who switches.

The age point is a good one

If a man can say he is a women and legally be classed as one

Why can't a 45 year old say they are 13 and legally be classed as a child. Therefore able to have sex with other children.

Or a 13 year old identify as a 21 year old and so legally drink.

Why can't that Rachel Dolzeal be black? Surely transrace is ok?

^ obv not my views btw

Completely agree & I've said this all along.

Perhaps I need to identify as a 68 year old and start claiming my pension!